Social and Environmental Reporting in the Italian Higher Education System: Evidence from Two Best Practices

  • Sara MoggiEmail author
  • Chiara Leardini
  • Bettina Campedelli
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


The increasing need of accountability to key stakeholders, and the demand for new tools that are useful for governance at universities, have led to the development of new forms of reporting, including social and environmental reports (SERs), which are helpful in the implementation of knowledge and building awareness of sustainability issues. SERs are not only a useful tool for reporting but are a way to educate organizations and stakeholders to a greater sensitivity to SD topic, building virtuous circles that involve students, professors, employees, and community. This study presented a picture of the development of SERs in the Italian Higher Education sector, the main frameworks spontaneously developed, and two selected best practices where SER was improved significantly: Università di Macerata and Università di Ferrara. To reach this aim, the main informants involved in the reporting process on the governance level, as the sustainability responsible, or the rectors of the universities were interviewed. The findings outlined the peculiarities of this process in two successful cases, such as governance compliance and the sharing of knowledge.


Social and environmental report Universities Sustainable development Italy 



The authors acknowledge the people interviewed at Università di Ferrara and Università di Macerata for sharing with us their knowledge and experience and their feeling that the path of SER could be developed.


  1. Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plann High Educ 31:15–22Google Scholar
  2. Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, BC; Stony Creek, CT, p 416Google Scholar
  3. Frey M, Melis M, Vagnoni E (2009) Recent developments in social and environmental reporting among Italian universities: a critical evaluation of leading edge practices. In: Baldarelli M (ed) Civil economy, democracy, transparency and social and environmental accounting research role: some reflections in theory and in practice deriving from 2nd CSEAR conference-Italy, Mc Graw Hill, p 426Google Scholar
  4. Godemann J, Bebbington J, Herzig C, Moon J (2014) Higher education and sustainable development: exploring possibilities for organisational change. Account Audit Account J 27:218–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray R, Milne M (2002) Sustainability reporting: who’s kidding whom? Chart Account J NZ 81:66–70Google Scholar
  6. Gruppo di Studio per il Bilancio Sociale (GBS) (2008) Il Bilancio sociale. Documento di Ricerca N. 7. La Rendicontazione Sociale nelle Università. Giuffrè Editore, p 32Google Scholar
  7. Holmberg J, Svanström M, Peet D-J, Mulder K, Ferrer-Balas D, Segalàs J (2008) Embedding sustainability in higher education through interaction with lecturers: case studies from three European technical universities. Eur J Eng Educ 33:271–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Karatzoglou B (2013) An in-depth literature review of the evolving roles and contributions of universities to education for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 49:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khan T (2013) Sustainability accounting courses, talloires declaration and academic research. Int J Sustain High Educ 14:42–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koester RJ, Eflin J, Vann J (2006) Greening of the campus: a whole-systems approach. J Clean Prod 14:769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leal Filho W (2000) Dealing with misconceptions on the concept of sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 1:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leal Filho W, Wright TSA (2002) Barriers on the path to sustainability: European and Canadian perspectives in higher education. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 9:179–186Google Scholar
  13. Leal Filho W (2011) About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. High Educ Policy 24:427–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee K-H, Barker M, Mouasher A (2013) Is it even espoused? an exploratory study of commitment to sustainability as evidenced in vision, mission, and graduate attribute statements in Australian universities. J Clean Prod 48:20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lozano R (2006) Incorporation and institutionalization of SD into universities: breaking through barriers to change. J Clean Prod 14:787–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moggi, S. (2013). La rendicontazione sociale nelle Università italiane: le motivazioni che ne inducono lo sviluppo. PhD Thesis, University of VeronaGoogle Scholar
  17. Nejati M, Shafaei A, Salamzadeh Y, Daraei M (2011) Corporate social responsibility and universities: a study of top 10 world universities’ websites. Afr J Bus Manage 5:440–447Google Scholar
  18. Rode H, Michelsen G (2008) Levels of indicator development for education for sustainable development. Environ Educ Res 14:19–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shriberg M (2004) Assessing sustainability: criteria, tools, and implications. In: Corcoran Blaze P, Wals AEJ (eds) Higher education and the challenge of sustainability. Problematics, promise, and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, p 355Google Scholar
  20. Sterling S (2004) Higher education, sustainability, and the role of systemic learning2. In: Concoran Blaze P, Wals EJA (eds) Higher education and the challenge of sustainability. Problematics, promise, and practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, p 355Google Scholar
  21. Towns B, Cocklin C (2006) Triple Bottom Line (TBL) reporting and strategic change in higher education. In: Leal Filho W, Carpenter D (eds) Sustainability in the Australasian university context. Peter Lang GmbH, Berlin, p 293Google Scholar
  22. Velazquez L, Munguia N, Platt A, Taddei J (2006) Sustainable university: what can be the matter? J Clean Prod 14:810–819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waas T, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2010) University research for sustainable development: definition and characteristics explored. J Clean Prod 18:629–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. WCED (1987) Our common future. World commission on environment and development. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 400Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Moggi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chiara Leardini
    • 1
  • Bettina Campedelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly

Personalised recommendations