Abstract
The paper presents a characterization of trans-disciplinary research and sustainability science and education, and argues for its necessity in addition to traditional forms of knowledge production. A short analysis on the obstacles met within the academic community for those working in trans-disciplinary research and education in an often rather conservative environment is also made. Finally, some examples are given, and conclusions on the implementation of integrative, trans-disciplinary research and sustainability science against the background of freedom of teaching and research will be drawn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baltic University Programme www.balticuniv.uu.se
Bolin B, Clark W, Corell R, Dickson N, Faucheux S, Gallopan G, Gruebler A, Hall M, Huntley B, Jaeger J, Jodha N, Kasperson R, Kates R, Lowe I, Mabogunje A, Matson P, McCarthy J, Mooney H, Moore B, O’Riordan T, Schellnhuber J, Svedin U (2000) Sustainability science: statement of the Friibergh Workshop on sustainability science. http://sustainabilityscience.org/content.html?contentid=774. Last accessed 14 Apr 2014
Böschen S, Kastenhofer K, Marschall L, Rust I, Soentgen J, Wehling P (2006) Scientific cultures of non-knowledge in the controversy over Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO). Cases Molecular Biology and Ecology GAIA 15(4):294–301
Bozeman MC (1990) The environments of United-States R-and-D laboratories—political and market influences. Policy Sci 23:25–56
BUP (2007) Baltic University Urban Forum. http://www.balticuniv.uu.se/buuf/. Last accessed 14 Apr 2014
BUP (2013) Annual Report 2012. Baltic University Programme Uppsala Centre for Sustainable Development, Uppsala University
Burger P, Kamber R (2003) Cognitive integration in transdisciplinary science: Knowledge as a key notion. Issues in Integrative Studies 21:43–73
Conklin J (2009) Wicked problems and social complexity. White Paper, CogNexus Institute
Decker M (2007) Angewandte interdisziplinäre Forschung in der Technikfolgenabschätzung. Graue Reihe der Europäischen Akademie zur Erforschung von Folgen wissenschaftlich-technischer Entwicklungen, Bad-Neuenahr-Ahrweiler GmbH
Dörner D (1997) The logic of failure: recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Perseus Press, Cambridge
Dusseldorp M (2012) Bildungspotenziale der Simulation von TA-Institutionen: Das Beispiel des TAB. In: Dusseldorp, M. and Beecroft, R. (2012). Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren. Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden. Springer VS
EEA (European Envionment Agency) (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896 –2000. In: Harremoës P et al. (eds) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
EEA (European Envionment Agency) (2013) Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. In: Harremoës P et al. (eds) Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social- ecological systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 2005(30):441–473
Funtowicz S, Ravets J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd
Funtowicz S, Ravets J (2003) Post-normal science. Prepared for the international society for ecological economics—Internet encyclopedia of ecological economics. http://isecoeco.org/pdf/pstnormsc.pdf. Last accessed 12 Aug 2014
Gibbons M, Nowotny H, Limoges C (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Pubn Inc, London
Goldie J, Douglas B, Furnass B (2005) In search of sustainability. CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne
Gross M, Hoffmann-Riem H, Krohn W (2005) Realexperimente. Robustheit und Dynamik ökologischer Gestaltungen in der Wissensgesellschaft. Soziale Welt 54:241–258
Grunwald A (2002) Normativ, aber nicht normativistisch. Bemerkungen zur Grenze zwischen Wissen, Werten und Bekehrung als Anwort auf Christian Berg. Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis Nr. 2, 11. Jg., Juli 2002
Guston DH, Sarewitz C (2002) Real-time technology assessment. Tech Soc 24:93109
Hirsch-Hadorn G, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) (2008) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer Science + Business Media B.V, Dordrecht
Hult M, Lennung SA (2007) Towards a defintions of action research: a note and bibliography. J Manage Stud 17(2):241–250
Jackson T (2009) Prosperity without Growth? The transition to a sustainable economy. Earthscan, London
John T (2012) Transdisciplinarity as a research practice to approach sustainability challenges: a social-ecological perspective. John Benjamins Publishing, Amsterdam
Jickling B (1994) Why I don’t want my children to be educated for sustainable development. Trumpeter 11(3). http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/325/497. Last accessed 14 Apr 2012
Kastenhofer K (2011) Risk assessment of emerging technologies and post-normal science. Sci Technol Human Values 36(3):307–333
Kates RW (2012) From the Unity of Nature to Sustainability Science: Ideas and Practice. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the urban environment. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, New York
Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall MJ, Jaeger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642, American Association for the Advancement of Science
Klein JT, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Häberli R, Bill A, Scholz RW, Welti M (eds) (2001) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. Synthesebücher. Birkhäuser, Basel
Knorr Cetina K (1999) Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Kopfmüller J, Brandl V, Jörissen J, Paetau M, Banse G, Coenen R, Grunwald A (2001) Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Edition Sigma: Berlin
Kuhn TS (1970) The structure of scientific revolutions. International encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol 2/2, 1962. The University of Chicago, Chicago
Leal W (2011) About the role of Universities and their contribution to sustainable development. High Educ Policy 24:427–438
Mulder K (2010) Don’t preach! Practice! Value laden statements in academic sustainability education. Int J Sustain High Educ 11(1):74–85
Nerland M, Jensen K, Bekele TA (2010) Changing cultures of knowledge production and learning in higher education: a literature review. University of Oslo Department of Educational Research, Oslo
Parr A (2009) Hijacking sustainability. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Platje J (2006) Who is interested in what kind of sustainable development? Time- horizons and stakeholder interests. Econ Environ Stud 8:13–20
PNAS (2010) Sustainability science. http://sustainability.pnas.org/. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Pohl C (2011) What is progress in transdisciplinary research? Futures 43:618–626
Pohl C, Hirsch-Hadorn. (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom, Munich
Polimeni, J.M., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., Alcott, B. (eds.) (2008). The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements. Earthscan
Rittel WJH, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169, Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company
Schaltegger S, Beckmann M, Hansen Erik G (2013) Transdisciplinarity in corporate sustainability: mapping the field. Bus Strategy Environ 22:219–230
Scott W (2002) Education and sustainable development: challenges, responsibilities, and frames of mind. Trumpeter 18(1):1–6
Sterrmann JD (2012) Sustaining sustainability: creating a systems science in a fragmented academy and polarized word. In: Weinstein MP, Turner RE (eds) Sustainability science: the emerging paradigm and the Urban environment. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant: basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington
Swart R, Raskin P, Robinson J, Kates RW, Clarc WC (2002) Critical challenges for sustainability science. Science 297:1994–1995
WBGU (1997) World in transition: the research challenge. German advisory council on global change, Alfred-Wegener-Institute for Polar and marine research. Springer, Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Will, M., Rydén, L. (2015). Trans-disciplinarity in Sustainability Science and Education. In: Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L., Kuznetsova, O., Paço, A. (eds) Integrative Approaches to Sustainable Development at University Level. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10690-8_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10690-8_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10689-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10690-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)