Advertisement

A Complex Framework: Expanding the Understanding of the Human Being and Organizations to Integrate Sustainability in Education and Promote Transformative Learning

  • Lisiane Celia PalmaEmail author
  • Eugênio Ávila Pedrozo
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Sustainability is a multidimensional issue and consequently, it requires multiple alternatives to be viewed through a complex lens. Thus, this paper presents a complex conceptual framework that relates levels of individual and organizational learning to different understandings that people have of sustainability and different ways of understanding the human being and organizations. The results of this study may help educational institutions, coordinators and professors to integrate sustainability in education and to promote transformative learning, presenting some key elements to this end. This study also presents ways to relate different approaches in order to deal with the complexity and opens space for the emergence of new solutions that are required to deal with issues related to sustainability. It brings questions related to the role of individuals and their relationships with others and with nature, and the role of educational institutions in society.

Keywords

Sustainability Complexity Learning 

References

  1. Barin-Cruz L, Pedrozo E, Estivalete V, De FB (2006) Towards sustainable development strategies: a complex view following the contribution of Edgar Morin. Manag Decis 44(7):871–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson G (1972) Steps to an ecology of mind. Chandler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker C (2006) The human actor in ecological economics: Philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecol Econ 60:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bina O, Vaz SG (2011) Humans, environment and economies: From vicious relationships to virtuous responsibility. Ecol Econ 72:170–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freire P (1987) Pedagogia do Oprimido. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 17ª edGoogle Scholar
  6. Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Martinet AC, Reynaud E (2004) Entreprise durable finance et stratégie. Revue Française de Gestion 30(152):121–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mezirow J (1997) Transformative learning: theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 74:5–12Google Scholar
  9. Mezirow J (1978) Perspective transformation. Adult. Education 28(2):100–110Google Scholar
  10. Morin E (2008) O Método 1: a natureza da natureza. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: SulinaGoogle Scholar
  11. Morin E (2011) O Método 2: a vida da vida. Porto Alegre: SulinaGoogle Scholar
  12. Morin E (2003) Para Navegar no século XXI—Tecnologias do Imaginário e Cibercultura. 3ª Ed. Porto Alegre—Edipucrs/SulinaGoogle Scholar
  13. Reevo (2014) Mapeo Colectivo de La Educacion Alternativa. www.map.reevo.org. Accessed 30 Mar 2014
  14. Siebenhüner B (2000) Homo sustinens—towards a new conception of humans for the science of sustainability. Ecol Econ 32:15–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sipos Y, Battisti B, Grimm K (2008) Achieving transformative sustainability learning: engaging head, hands and heart. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(1):68–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Soderbaum P (1999) Values ideology and politics in ecological economics. Ecol Econ 28:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Soderbaum P (2009) Making actors, paradigms and ideologies visible in governance for sustainability. Sustain Dev 17:70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sterling S (2010–2011) Transformative learning and sustainability: sketching the conceptual ground. Learn Teach High Educ 5:17–32Google Scholar
  19. Sterling S (2003) Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: explorations in the context of sustainability. 476 f. Tese (Ph.D. in education, systems thinking and sustainability)—centre for research in education and the environment, University of Bath, BathGoogle Scholar
  20. Stubbs W, Cocklin C (2008) Teaching sustainability to business students: shifting mindsets. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(3):206–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomas I (2009) Critical thinking, transformative learning, sustainable education, and problem-based learning in universities. J Transforma Educ 7(3):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Waddell S (2007). Realising global change: developing the tools; building the infrastructure. J Corp Citizensh 26:69–84Google Scholar
  23. Wals AEJ, Schwarzin L (2012) Fostering organizational sustainability through dialogic interaction. Learn Organ 19(1):11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6:203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wollin A (1999) Punctuated equilibrium: reconciling theory of revolutionary and incremental change. Syst Res Behav Sci 16:359–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisiane Celia Palma
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Eugênio Ávila Pedrozo
    • 2
  1. 1.Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rio Grande do Sul (IFRS)CanoasBrazil
  2. 2.Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations