Advertisement

The Sustainable Campus Observatory: A Comprehensive Framework for Benchmarking University Performance Toward Sustainability

  • Mathias BouckaertEmail author
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

This paper aims to address the lack of global assessment approaches for benchmarking the sustainable performance of higher education institutions. Such approaches are critical for universities wishing to analyse and improve their performance through the identification of best practices among their peers. Over the past several years, comparative assessment has become a central concern in the academe, especially with the introduction of global rankings. Beside rankings, two other broad categories of assessment can be differentiated: specific research projects and sustainability assessment frameworks. In a first step, a comparison of the 3 identified categories is undertaken on the basis of four criteria for success: relevance, measurability, holism and digestibility. We observe that while the three types of methods differ in their strengths, none of them manages to meet all the criteria. In a second step, we introduce a new assessment tool: the Sustainable Campus Observatory. Built on three pillars, i.e. institution’s missions, operations and external outreach, it proposes a benchmarking solution to university stakeholders wishing to identify areas for improvement. Lying at the intersection of existing evaluation practices, the Observatory integrates the multiple dimensions of sustainability in HEIs through a comprehensive framework that ensures intelligibility and comparability of results.

Keywords

Assessment Benchmarking Sustainable development University Performance 

References

  1. Altbach PG (2010) The state of the rankings. Inside Higher Ed, 11 Nov 2010Google Scholar
  2. Beringer A (2006) Campus sustainability audit research in Atlantic Canada: pioneering the campus sustainability assessment framework. Int J Sustain High Educ 7(4):437–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Billaut J-C, Bouyssou D, Vincke P (2010) Should you believe in the Shanghai Ranking? Scientometrics 84(1):237–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camp RC (1989) Benchmarking: the Search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. American Society for Quality Control (ASQC), Milwaukee, 299 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Corcoran PB, Walker KE, Wals AEJ (2004) Case studies, make-your-case studies, and case stories: a critique of case-study methodology in sustainability in higher education. Environ Educ Res 10:7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis SA, Edmister JH, Sullivan K, West CK (2003) Educating sustainable societies for the twenty-first century. Int J Sustain High Educ 4(2):169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Enserink M (2007) Education. Who ranks the university rankers? Science 317(5841):1026–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Etzkowitz H, Webster A, Gebhardt C, Terra BRC (2000) The future of the university and the university of the future: evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Res Policy 29(2):313–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fadeeva Z, Mochizuki Y (2010) Higher education for today and tomorrow: university appraisal for diversity, innovation and change towards sustainable development. Sustainable Science 5:249–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Florian RV (2007) Irreproducibility of the results of the Shanghai academic ranking of world universities. Scientometrics 72(1):25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fonseca A, Macdonald A, Dandy E, Valenti P (2011) The state of sustainability reporting at Canadian universities. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(1):22–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Glover A, Peters C, Haslett SK (2011) Education for sustainable development and global citizenship: an evaluation of the validity of the STAUNCH auditing tool. Int J Sustain High Educ 12(2):125–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hart A, Maddison E, Wolff D (2007) Community-university partnerships in practice. National Institute of Adult Continuing Education (NIACE), Leicester 224 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Hua Y (2013) Sustainable campus as a living laboratory for climate change mitigation and adaptation: the role of design thinking processes. In: König A (ed) Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2013) “Climate change, The physical science basis”. WG I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report—summary for policymakers, Twelfth Session of Working Group I, Stockholm, 27 September 2013, 36 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Karatzoglou B (2012) An in-depth literature review of the evolving roles and contributions of universities to education for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 49:44–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kelly U, McLellan D, McNicoll I (2004) The economic impact of UK higher education institutions. Universities UK, University of Strathclyde, UKGoogle Scholar
  18. Kempkes G, Pohl C (2006) The efficiency of German universities—some evidence from non-parametric and parametric methods. Appl Econ 42(16):2063–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuah CT, Wong KY (2011) Efficiency assessment of universities through data envelopment analysis. Procedia Computer Science 3:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mian SA (1997) Assessing and managing the university technology business incubator: an integrative framework. J Bus Ventur 12(4):251–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moed HF, Burger WJM, Frankfort JG, Van Raan AF (1985) The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Res Policy 14(3):131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Monjon S, Waelbroeck P (2003) Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data. Int J Ind Organ 21(9):1255–1270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. OECD (2010a) PISA 2009 at a glance. OECD Publishing, Paris 99 pGoogle Scholar
  24. OECD (2010b) AHELO assessment design. Group of national experts on the AHELO feasibility study, Directorate for Education, Institutional Management in Higher Education Governing Board, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Rauch JN, Newman J (2009) Defining sustainability metric targets in an institutional setting. Int J Sustain High Educ 10:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rauhvargers A (2013) Global University rankings and their impact—report II. European University Association, Brussels 86 pGoogle Scholar
  27. Rieckmann M (2012) Future-oriented higher education: which key competencies should be fostered through university teaching and learning? Futures 44(2):127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shriberg M (2002) Institutional assessment tools for sustainability in higher education: strengths, weaknesses and implications for practice and theory. Int J Sustain High Educ 3(3):254–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swearingen White S (2009) Early participation in the American college and university presidents’ climate commitment. Int J Sustain High Educ 10:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Uyarra E (2008) The impact of universities on regional innovation: a critique and policy implications. Manchester Business School Working Paper, p 564Google Scholar
  31. Van Vught F, Ziegele F (2012) Multidimensional ranking. The design and development of U-Multirank, vol 37. Springer, Dordrecht, 194 pGoogle Scholar
  32. Vaughter P, Wright T, McKenzie M, Lidstone L (2013) Greening the Ivory Trower: a review of educational research on sustainability in post-secondary education. Sustainability 5:2252–2271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wiek A, Withycombe L, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6(2):203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wissema JG (2009) Towards the third generation university: managing the university in transition. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham 272 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wright TS (2002) Definitions and frameworks for environmental sustainability in higher education. High Educ Policy 15:105–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yarime M, Tanaka Y (2012) The issues and methodologies in sustainability assessment tools for higher education institutions: a review of recent trends and future challenges. J Educ Sustain Dev 6(1):63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Campus Chair, REEDS LaboratoryUniversity of Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesGuyancourtFrance

Personalised recommendations