Digital Learning for Sustainability: An Interactive Magazine for Students, Academics and Expert Practitioners

Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


The complexity which underpins the evolving concept of learning for sustainability requires effective inter-disciplinary collaboration and networking to succeed. Developing a shared understanding and route maps for sustainability would not be feasible without the rapid advances in information technology, global access to information and the evolution of self-organised socio-technical networks. The University of Worcester in the UK has developed a learning elective programme (cross-faculty) for sustainability, which aims to build skills to enhance employability using innovative teaching and learning techniques. A new dimension to this innovative pedagogy is the development of an online magazine and virtual learning environment called susthingsout to promote and facilitate learning for sustainability in the wider undergraduate curriculum, including activities on campus and in the wider community. This paper outlines how this new platform has been co-created by students, academics and expert practitioners and how it supports the application of theoretical knowledge and learning to consolidate and enhance students’ employment prospects. The main findings are that the model can be effective but it has to draw on a range of skills beyond disciplines, the institution and the classroom, a major challenge to established academic practice. Students developed a much wider understanding of sustainability, saw the issues come to life and felt that the experts who contributed was one of the strongest element. The requirement to work in teams for a live project was the most daunting but ultimately rewarding experience. Major issues to be addressed include steep learning curves (for all), cross-functional planning, managing issues beyond sustainability, marketing programme for external followers, providing safe spaces for students to make mistakes and better linkages to assessments and inputs.


Education for sustainable development (ESD) Employability Innovative pedagogy Digital learning Trans-disciplinarity 


  1. Ballantyne R, Packer J (2005) Promoting environmentally sustainable attitudes and behaviour through free-choice learning experiences: what is the state of the game? Environ Educ Res 11(3):281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter P, Jack S (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep 13(4):544–559Google Scholar
  3. Beringer A, Wright T, Malone L (2008) Sustainability in higher education in Atlantic Canada. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(1):48–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnett M (2002) Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environ Educ Res 8(1):9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conole G (2010) Facilitating new forms of discourse for learning and teaching: harnessing the power of Web 2.0 practices. Open. Learning 25(2):141–151Google Scholar
  6. Carlos RJ, Capriotti P (2009) Communicating CSR, citizenship and sustainability on the web. J Commun Manag 13(2):157–175Google Scholar
  7. Creswell J (1998) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  8. Dengler M (2008) Classroom active learning complemented by an online discussion forum to teach. Sustain J Geogr High Educ 32(3):481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enonbun A (2010) Constructivism and Web 2.0 in the emerging learning era: a global perspective. J Strateg Innov Sustain 6(4):17–27Google Scholar
  10. Isacsson A, Gretzel U (2011) Facebook as an edutainment medium to engage students in sustainability and tourism. J Hosp Tour Technol 2(1):81–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jenkins M, Browne T, Walker R, Hewitt R (2011) The development of technology enhanced learning: findings from a 2008 survey of UK higher education institutions. Interact Learn Environ 19(5):447–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ (2004) Mixed methods research: a research paradigm whose time has come source. Educ Res 33(7):14–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Junyent M, de Ciurana AMG (2008) Education for sustainability in university studies: a model for reorienting the curriculum. Br Educ Res J 34(6):763–782Google Scholar
  14. Kagawa F (2007) Dissonance in students’ perceptions of sustainable development and sustainability: implications for curriculum change. Int J Sustain High Educ 8(3):317–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kassens-Noor E (2012) Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: the case of sustainable tweets. Act Learn High Educ 13(1):9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurland NB, Michaud KEH, Best M, Wohldmann E, Cox H, Pontikis K, Vasishth A (2010) Overcoming silos: the role of an interdisciplinary course in shaping a sustainability network. Acad Manag Learn Educ 9(3):457–476Google Scholar
  17. Lange EA (2004) Transformative and restorative learning: a vital dialectic for sustainable societies. Adult Educ Q 54(2):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li RYM, Pak DHA (2010) Resistance and motivation to share sustainable development knowledge by Web 2.0. J Inf Knowl Manag 9(3):251–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lugg A (2007) Developing sustainability-literate citizens through outdoor learning: possibilities for outdoor education in higher education. J Adventure Educ Outdoor Learn 7(2):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Martin S, Dillon J, Higgins P, Peters C, Scott W (2013) Divergent evolution in education for sustainable development policy in the United Kingdom: current status, best practice, and opportunities for the future. Sustainability 5(4):1522–1544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Martin S, Dawe G, Jucker R (2006) Embedding education for sustainable development in higher education in the UK. Drivers and barriers for implementing sustainable development in higher education. UNESCO, Paris, pp 61–67Google Scholar
  22. Martin S (2008) Sustainable development, systems thinking and professional practice. J Educ Sustain Dev 2(1):31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McGuire CJ, Castle SR (2010) An analysis of student self-assessment of online, blended, and face-to-face learning environments: implications for sustainable education delivery. Int Educ Stud 3(3):36–40Google Scholar
  24. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  25. Roberts C, Roberts J (2008) Starting with the staff: how swapshops can develop ESD and empower practitioners. Environ Educ Res 14(4):423–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shephard K (2008) Higher education for sustainability: seeking affective learning outcomes. Int J Sustain High Educ 9(1):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shepherd CE, Skrabut S (2011) Rethinking electronic portfolios to promote sustainability among teachers. TechTrends 55(5):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sibbel A (2009) Pathways towards sustainability through higher education. Int J Sustain High Educ 10(1):68–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stake RE (1995) The art of case study research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  30. Thomas G (2011) A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qual Inq 17(6):511–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilbury D (2011) Higher education for sustainability: a global overview of commitment and progress. High Educ World 4:18–28Google Scholar
  32. University of Worcester (2013) Strategic Plan 2013–2018. Last Accessed 29 March 2014
  33. Van Wynsberghe R, Andruske CL (2007) Research in the service of co-learning: sustainability and community engagement. Can J Educ 1(1):349–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Warburton K (2003) Deep learning and education for sustainability. Int J Sustain High Educ 4(1):44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiek A, Bernstein MJ, Laubichler M, Caniglia G, Minteer B, Lang DJ (2013) A global classroom for international sustainability education. Creative Educ 4(4A):19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd ed. edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Science and the Environment, Worcester Business School, Institute for Humanities and Creative Arts, Sustainability DepartmentUniversity of WorcesterHenwick GroveUK

Personalised recommendations