The Biology of Cooperative Decision-Making: Neurobiology to International Relations

  • Nicholas D. Wright


To negotiate, cooperate or compete successfully with another, we should know what motivates them and how they make decisions. To understand how humans really make decisions, we can draw on a biologically grounded account that combines evidence from neuroscience, biology, psychology and economics. I discuss three areas central to negotiation: first, evidence from biology and neuroscience about how human cooperation emerges and is controlled; second, the neural bases of the fairness motivation; and third, the neural phenomenon of “prediction error” that affects how our actions impact on others. I link each area to international negotiation through historical cases and give practical policy recommendations. Finally, I describe four general rules for using neuroscience, and the behavioural decision sciences more generally, to apply to practical policy.


Prediction Error Anterior Insula Social Motivation Ultimatum Game Rational Choice Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Akerlof, G. A. (1979). The case against conservative macroeconomics: An inaugural lecture. Economica, 46, 219–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akerlof, G. A., & Shiller, R. J. (2009). Animal spirits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alvergne, A., Faurie, C., & Raymond, M. (2009). Variation in testosterone levels and male reproductive effort: Insight from a polygynous human population. Hormones and Behavior, 56, 491–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., Hoffman, M., & List, J. A. (2011). Stakes matter in ultimatum games. American Economic Review, 101, 3427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (2008). Psychological processes in international negotiations. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Behrens, T. E. J., Hunt, L. T., & Rushworth, M. F. S. (2009). The computation of social behavior. Science, 324, 1160–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). A proximate perspective on reciprocal altruism. Human Nature, 13, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosnan, S. F., & De Waal, F. B. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caruana, F., Jezzini, A., Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., Rizzolatti, G., & Gallese, V. (2011). Emotional and social behaviors elicited by electrical stimulation of the insula in the macaque monkey. Current Biology, 21, 195–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dayan, P., & Seymour, B. J. (2008). Values and actions in aversion. In Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  14. De Dreu, C. K. W., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F. S., Van Dijk, E., & Feith, S. W. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328, 1408–1411.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Decety, J., Jackson, P. L., Sommerville, J. A., Chaminade, T., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2004). The neural bases of cooperation and competition: An fMRI investigation. NeuroImage, 23, 744–751.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dugatkin, L. A. (1997). Cooperation among animals: An evolutionary perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fehr E, Camerer CF (2007) Social neuroeconomics: the neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, 419–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flynn, F. G. (1999). Anatomy of the insula functional and clinical correlates. Aphasiology, 13, 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frackowiak, R. S. J., Ashburner, J. T., Penny, W. D., Zeki, S., Friston, K. J., Frith, C. D., Dolan, R. J., & Price, C. J. (Eds.). (2004). Human brain function (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  20. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 127–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Galluccio, M. (2011). Transformative leadership for peace negotiation. In F. Aquilar & M. Galluccio (Eds.), Psychological and political strategies for peace negotiation: A cognitive approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Gerson, M. S. (2010). The Sino-Soviet border conflict. CNA.
  23. Glimcher, P. W. (2004). Decisions, uncertainty, and the brain: The science of neuroeconomics (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Glimcher, P. W., & Fehr, E. (2013). Neuroeconomics decision making and the brain. Amsterdam, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  25. Glimcher, P. W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306, 447–452.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Halko M-L, Hlushchuk Y, Hari R, Schürmann M (2009) Competing with peers: mentalizing-related brain activity reflects what is at stake. Neuroimage 46, 542–548.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Henrich, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Ensminger, J., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., Cardenas, J. C., Gurven, M., Gwako, E., Henrich, N., Lesorogol, C., Marlowe, F., Tracer, D., & Ziker, J. (2006). Costly punishment across human societies. Science, 312, 1767–1770.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ho, T. H., Lim, N., & Camerer, C. F. (2006). Modeling the psychology of consumer and firm behavior with behavioral economics. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 307–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
  31. Hsu, M., Anen, C., & Quartz, S. R. (2008). The right and the good: Distributive justice and neural encoding of equity and efficiency. Science, 320, 1092–1095.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (1995). The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler R (1986) Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review 76, 728–741.Google Scholar
  36. Kapstein, E. B. (2008). Fairness considerations in world politics: Lessons from international trade negotiations. Political Science Quarterly, 123, 229–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King-Casas, B., Sharp, C., Lomax-Bream, L., Lohrenz, T., Fonagy, P., & Montague, P. R. (2008). The rupture and repair of cooperation in borderline personality disorder. Science, 321, 806–810.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King-Casas, B., Tomlin, D., Anen, C., Camerer, C. F., Quartz, S. R., & Montague, P. R. (2005). Getting to know you: Reputation and trust in a two-person economic exchange. Science, 308, 78–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koenigs, M., & Tranel, D. (2007). Irrational economic decision-making after ventromedial prefrontal damage: Evidence from the ultimatum game. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 951–956.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005). Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature, 435, 673–676.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lambert, A. P. N. (1995). The psychology of air power. London: Royal United Services Institute for Defence Studies.Google Scholar
  42. List, J. A., & Cherry, T. L. (2000). Learning to accept in ultimatum games: Evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers. Experimental Economics, 3, 11–29.Google Scholar
  43. MacDonald, K., & MacDonald, T. M. (2010). The peptide that binds: A systematic review of oxytocin and its prosocial effects in humans. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mackintosh, N. J. (1983). Conditioning and associative learning. New York: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  45. Mitchell, C. R. (2000). Gestures of conciliation: Factors contributing to successful olive branches. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Niv, Y., & Schoenbaum, G. (2008). Dialogues on prediction errors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 265–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Doherty, J. P. (2004). Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: Insights from neuroimaging. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 769–776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. O’Doherty, J., Dayan, P., Schultz, J., Deichmann, R., Friston, K., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Dissociable roles of ventral and dorsal striatum in instrumental conditioning. Science, 304, 452–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. O’Doherty, J. P., Hampton, A., & Kim, H. (2007). Model-based fMRI and its application to reward learning and decision making. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1104, 35–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K. (2010). Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 13099–13104.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Quester, G. H. (1990). The psychological effects of bombing on civilian populations: Wars of the past. In B. Glad (Ed.), Psychological dimensions of war (pp. 201–214). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Rilling, J. K., Goldsmith, D. R., Glenn, A. L., Jairam, M. R., Elfenbein, H. A., Dagenais, J. E., Murdock, C. D., & Pagnoni, G. (2008). The neural correlates of the affective response to unreciprocated cooperation. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1256–1266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rilling, J. K., Gutman, D. A., Zeh, T. R., Pagnoni, G., Berns, G. S., & Kilts, C. D. (2002). A neural basis for social cooperation. Neuron, 35, 395–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schultz, W., Dayan, P., & Montague, P. R. (1997). A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275, 1593–1599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Singer, T., Kiebel, S. J., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron, 41, 653–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439, 466–469.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slonim, R., & Roth, A. E. (1998). Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak republic. Econometrica, 66, 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spangler, S. E. (1991). Force and accommodation in world politics. DIANE Publishing. Maxwell AFB, Ala.: Air University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Swaine, M. D., Zhang, T., & Cohen, D. F. S. (2006). Managing Sino-American crises: Case studies and analysis. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
  61. Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D. (2008). The sunny side of fairness: Preference for fairness activates reward circuitry (and disregarding unfairness activates self-control circuitry). Psychological Science, 19, 339–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Animal intelligence: Experimental studies. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C. F., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2010). Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences. Nature, 463, 1089–1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Varnavas, G. G., & Grand, W. (1999). The insular cortex: Morphological and vascular anatomic characteristics. Neurosurgery, 44, 127–136. discussion 136–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Wang, Z. (2012). Never forget national humiliation: Historical memory in Chinese politics and foreign relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  68. Wingfield, J. C., Hegner, R. E., Dufty, A. M., & Ball, G. F. (1990). The “challenge hypothesis”: Theoretical implications for patterns of testosterone secretion, mating systems, and breeding strategies. The American Naturalist, 136, 829–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wobber, V., Hare, B., Maboto, J., Lipson, S., Wrangham, R., & Ellison, P. T. (2010). Differential changes in steroid hormones before competition in bonobos and chimpanzees. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 12457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wright, N. D., Bahrami, B., Johnson, E., Di Malta, G., Rees, G., Frith, C. D., & Dolan, R. J. (2012). Testosterone disrupts human collaboration by increasing egocentric choices. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 279, 2275–2280.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wright (2013) in Proceedings of 7th Annual Conference, Strategic Multilayer Assessment, Joint Staff DoD.Google Scholar
  72. Wright, N. D., & Sadjadpour, K. (2014). The neuroscience guide to negotiations with Iran. The Atlantic. Available at: Accessed March 12, 2014.
  73. Wright Nicholas D., Neural prediction error is central to diplomatic and military signalling (2014) in DiEuliis D, Casebeer W, Giordano J, Wright ND, Cabayan H (Eds) White paper on Leveraging Neuroscientific and Neurotechnological (NeuroS&T) Developments with Focus on Influence and Deterrence in a Networked World, US DoD Joint Staff.Google Scholar
  74. Wright, N. D., Symmonds, M., Fleming, S. M., & Dolan, R. J. (2011). Neural segregation of objective and contextual aspects of fairness. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 5244–5252.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zarif, J. (2013). Iran’s message: There is a way forward. Available at: Accessed March 21, 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas D. Wright
    • 1
  1. 1.Carnegie Endowment for International PeaceWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations