Abstract
International political negotiations that include sacred values often fall apart or, when concluded, prove unsustainable. Why? What can be done to make these settlements more sustainable? This chapter reviews the literature on sacred values and sacred rhetoric, focusing on why sacred values cannot be mixed with material trade-offs, how regular values become sacred, what we know about defusing them, and their immutability. It then applies new research to previous proposals for managing sacred values within international negotiations. Though sacred values are immutable, once acknowledged, they can be flexibly managed via tactics such as reframing, repositioning, and reprioritizing. Acknowledging and/or recognizing the other’s sacred values, however, is often a challenge. Thus, we suggest the need for SV negotiator training and propose a dual (ingroup and intergroup), process-based platform that negotiators can use to prepare parties for negotiations involving SVs. Lastly, we identify critical areas for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sacred rhetoric comprised high scores on the following properties: protected status, non-consequentialist reasoning, non-instrumentalism, non-negotiability, citation of boundaries, citation of authority, and moral outrage.
References
Alderdice, J. (2007). Remarks made at fifth meeting, permanent monitoring panel on terrorism. Erice, Italy: World Federation of Scientists.
Allred, K. G., Mallozzi, J. S., Matsui, F., & Raia, C. P. (1997). The influence of anger and compassion on negotiation performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(3), 175–187.
Aquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (2008). Psychological processes in international negotiations. New York: Springer.
Aquilar, F., & Galluccio, M. (Eds.). (2011). Psychological and political strategies for peace negotiation: A cognitive approach. New York: Springer.
Argo, N. (2006). The role of social context in terrorist attacks. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 52(22).
Argo, N. (2009). Why fight?: Examining self-interested versus communally-oriented motivations in Palestinian resistance and rebellion. Security Studies, 18(4), 651–680.
Argo, N. (unpublished data). Ritual and the sacralization of preferences.
Argo, T. N. (2013). Dirt, disorder and deontology. Unpublished Dissertation, The New School, Ann Arbor.
Atran, S. (2006). “Devoted Actor” versus “Rational Actor” Models for understanding world conflict
Atran, S. (2013). Email communication.
Atran, S., & Axelrod, R. (2008). Refraining sacred values. Negotiation Journal, 24(3), 221–246.
Atran, S., Axelrod, R., & Davis, R. (2007). Sacred barriers to conflict resolution. Science, 317(5841), 1039–1040.
Atran, S. J. G. (2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science, 336, 855–857.
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 1–16.
Bazerman, M., Tenbrunsel, A., & Wade-Benzoni, K. (2008). When “sacred” issues are at stake. Negotiation Journal, 24(1), 113–117.
Bennis, W. M., Medin, D. L., & Bartels, D. M. (2010). The costs and benefits of calculation and moral rules. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 187–202.
Berns, G., Bell, E., Capra, C., Prietula, M., Moore, S., Anderson, B., Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2012). The price of your soul: Neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 367(1589), 754–762.
Boyd, R., Gintis, H., & Bowles, S. (2010). Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science (New York, N.Y.), 328(5978), 617–620.
Brett, J. M. (2000). Culture and negotiation. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 97–104.
Brown, J., & Jennifer Gerarda, B. (2004). The role of apology in negotiation. Marquette Law Review, 87, 665–1025.
Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. (2012). The power of being heard: The benefits of ‘perspective-giving’ in the context of intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 855–866.
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dehghani, M., Atran, S., Iliev, R., et al. (2010). Sacred values and conflict over Iran’s nuclear program. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 540–546.
Duc, C., Hanselmann, M., Boesiger, P., & Tanner, C. (2013). Sacred values: Trade-off type matters. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics, 6(4), 252–263.
Eckstein, R. (1993). Ping pong diplomacy: A view from behind the scenes. The Journal of American-East Asian Relations, 2, 327–340.
Fischer, R., Callander, R., Reddish, P., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). How do rituals affect cooperation? Human Nature, 24, 115–125.
Fisher, R. (1978). International mediation: A working guide. New York: International Peace Academy.
Fisher, R. (1991). Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston: Houghton Mifflin (2nd ed./by Fisher, Ury, and Patton. ed.).
Frey, B. S., & Oberholzer-Gee, F. (1997). The cost of price incentives: An empirical analysis of motivation crowding-out. The American Economic Review, 87(4), 746–755.
Galluccio, M. (2011). Transformative leadership for peace negotiation. In F. Aquilar & M. Galluccio (Eds.), Psychological and political strategies for peace negotiation: A cognitive approach. New York: Springer.
Gibson, K. (2011). Making sense of the sacred. Negotiation Journal, 27(4), 477.
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D., & Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on the rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 104, 7357–7360.
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Sachdeva, S., & Medin, D. (2011). Psychology out of the laboratory: the challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist, 66, 507–519.
Goldberg, S. B., Green, E. D., & Sander, F. E. A. (1987). Saying you’re sorry. Negotiation Journal, 3(3), 221–224.
Hammond, J. S. (1999). Smart choices a practical guide to making better decisions. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Hanselman, M. T. C. (2008). Taboos and conflicts in decision-making: Sacred values, decision difficulty and emotions. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 51–63.
Hassner, R. E. (2009). War on sacred grounds. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hassner, R. E. (2011). Blasphemy and violence. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 23–45.
Hayes, R. E. (2002). Negotiations with terrorists. In V. A. Kremenyuk (Ed.), International negotiation: Analysis, approaches, issues (pp. 416–430). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hoffman, A. J., James Judson, G., Moore, D. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., et al. (1999). A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42(8), 1254–1276.
Hogg, M. B. (Ed.). (2012). Extremism and the psychology of uncertainty. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–960.
Janis, I. L. (1977). Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Kaufman, C. (2005). Rational choice and progress in the study of ethnic conflict: A review essay. Security Studies, 14(1), 178–207.
Kaufman, S. J. (2006). Symbolic politics or rational choice? Testing theories of extreme ethnic violence. International Security, 30(4), 45–86.
Kirschenbaum, H., & Henderson, V. (Eds.). (1989). The Carl Rogers Reader. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Luttwak, E. (1993). Give war a chance. In E. Licklider (Ed.), Stopping the killing: How civil wars end (pp. 235–268). New York: New York University Press.
Marietta, M. (2008). From my cold, dead hands: Democratic consequences of sacred rhetoric. The Journal of Politics, 70(03), 767–779.
Marietta, M. (2009). The absolutist advantage: Sacred rhetoric in contemporary presidential debate. Political Communication, 26(4), 388–411.
Marshall, D. A. (2002). Behavior, belonging, and belief: A theory of ritual practice. Sociological Theory, 20(3), 360–380.
Mason, R., MacLean, M., & de la Torre, M. (2003). Hadrian’s wall World heritage site: A case study. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.
Miles, L. K., Nind, L. K., & Macrae, C. N. (2009). The rhythm of rapport: Interpersonal synchrony and social perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(3), 585–589.
Moore, C. W. (1986). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
O’Hara, E. A., & Yarn, D. (2002). On apology and consilience. Washington Law Review, 77(4), 1121–1192.
Raiffa, H. (1982). The art and science of negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sadat, A. (1978). In search of identity: An autobiography. New York: Harper & Row. Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., Coman, A., & Atran, S. (2012). Religion, group threat and sacred values. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), 110.
Sheikh, H., Ginges, J., & Atran, S. (2013). Sacred values in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: resistance to social influence, temporal discounting, and exit strategies. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 1299, 11–24.
Susskind, L., Levine, H., Aran, G., Kaniel, S., Sheleg, Y., & Halbertal, M. (2005). Religious and ideological dimensions of the Israeli settlements issue: Reframing the narrative? Negotiation Journal, 21, 177–191.
Swidler, A. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 273–286.
Tenbrunsel, A., Wade-Benzoni, K., Plunkett Tost, L., Medvec, V., Thompson, L., and Bazerman, M. (2007). The reality and myth of sacred issues in ideologically-based negotiation. Working Paper: Notre Dame University.
Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with tradeoffs: psychological constraints and political implications.
Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320–324.
Tetlock, P. E., Kristel, O. V., Elson, S. B., Green, M. C., & Lerner, J. S. (2000). The psychology of the unthinkable: Taboo trade-offs, forbidden base rates, and heretical counterfactuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 853–870.
Themna, L., & Wallensteen, P. (2012). Armed conflicts, 1946–2011. Journal of Peace Research, 49(4), 565–575.
Thompson, L. L. (2005). The mind and heart of the negotiator (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Toft, M. D. (2010). Ending civil wars: A case for rebel victory? International Security, 34(4), 7–36.
Tropp, L. R., & Page-Gould, E. (2014). Intergroup contact. In: J. Dovidio and J. Simpson (Eds.) The APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2).
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2006). Manipulations of emotional context shape moral judgment. Psychological Science, 17(6), 476–477.
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2011). Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion, 11(2), 262–266.
Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695.
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 393–398.
Varshney, A. (2003). Nationalism, ethnic conflict, and rationality. Perspectives on Politics, 1(01), 85–99.
Vilarroya, O., & Hilferty, J. (2013). The neuroimaging of sacred values (pp. 25–35): Blackwell Science Publ.
Vorauer, J. D., & Sasaki, S. J. (2009). Helpful only in the Abstract?: Ironic effects of empathy in intergroup interaction. Psychological Science, 20(2), 191–197.
Wade, S. O. (2004). Using intentional, values-based dialogue to engage complex public policy conflicts. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 21(3), 361–379.
Acknowledgments
Special thanks to Ranan Tannenbaum for excellent research assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Argo, N., Ginges, J. (2015). Beyond Impasse: Addressing Sacred Values in International Political Negotiations. In: Galluccio, M. (eds) Handbook of International Negotiation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10687-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10687-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10686-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10687-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)