Abstract

This paper discusses the importance of strategy use in regulating cognitive processes, with a particular interest in co-regulation of the learning by peers in technology enhanced learning environments. Research on self-regulated learning has focused on cognitive, motivational and emotional regulation in relation to academic achievement. Co-regulation is an important facet of the regulatory processes taking place in communication-intensive learning environments that are geared towards peer interaction and social networking. This paper succinctly presents Self- and Co-Regulation (SCoR) general concepts and research and elaborates on why SCoR is particularly relevant to learning environments such as MOOCs that are designed with reference to connectivist learning theory. The paper discusses difficulties inherent to the field and stresses the need for commitment to designing environments that are effective for learners.

Keywords

Self-regulated learning Co-regulation of learning SCoR e-Learning Massive open online course MOOC 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P.M.: Motivation and volition in the course of action. In: Heckhausen, J., Heckhausen, H. (eds.) Motivation and action, pp. 275–299. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G.: Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology 96(3), 523–535 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bady, A.: The MOOC moment and the end of reform. Liberal Education 99(4) (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bandura, A.: Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28(2), 117–148 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. W.H. Freeman, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boekaerts, M.: Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction 7(2), 161–186 (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boyatt, R., Joy, M., Rocks, C., Sinclair, J.: What (use) is a MOOC? In: Uden, L., Tao, Y.H., Yang, H.C., Ting, I.H. (eds.) The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. pp. 133–145. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Efklides, A.: Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and co-regulation. European Psychologist 13(4), 277–287 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greene, J.A., Azevedo, R.: A macro-level analysis of SRL processes and their relations to the acquisition of a sophisticated mental model of a complex system. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34(1), 18–29 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heutte, J., Kaplan, J., Fenouillet, F., Caron, P.A., Rosselle, M.: MOOC user per- sistence - lessons from french educational policy adoption and deployment of a pilot course. In: Uden, L., et al. (eds.) The 3rd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, pp. 13–24. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan, J.: Self-Direction in Cooperative Learning - The Case of Study Circles. Ph.D. thesis, Paris 10 University, Nanterre (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan, J.: From self-direction to co-direction in adult cooperative learning. In: Brigham, S.M., Plumb, D. (eds.) Connected Understanding: Linkages Between Theory and Practice in Adult Education, pp. 176–180. Adult Education – Congresses, Montreal, Quebec (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan, J.: L’autodirection dans les apprentissages coopératifs: Le cas des Cercles d’Étude. Éditions Universitaires Européennes, Sarrebruck (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan, J., Fenouillet, F., de Montalembert, M.: ERICA - an instrument to assess individual and collective regulation of learning (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karsenti, T.: The MOOC - what the research says. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 10(2), 23–37 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kitsantas, A., Zimmerman, Barry, J.: Comparing self-regulatory processes among novice, non-expert, and expert volleyball players: A microanalytic study. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 14, 91–105 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLuhan, M.: Understanding media - The extensions of man. Routledge, London, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Reeve, J., Ryan, R., Deci, E.L., Jang, H.: Understanding and promoting autonomous self-regulation: A self-determination theory perspective. In: Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J. (eds.) Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning : Theory, Research, and Applications, pp. 223–244. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez, O.: The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (massive open online courses). Open Praxis 5(1), 67–73 (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ryan, R., Deci, E.L.: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic définitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 54–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ryan, R., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55(1), 68–78 (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salonen, P., Vauras, M., Efklides, A.: Social interaction - what can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? European Psychologist 10(3), 199 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schunk, D.H., Zimmerman, B.J.: Self-Regulated Learning - From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice. Guilford Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sitzmann, T., Ely, K.: A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin 137(3), 421–442 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Steffens, K.: Self-regulated leaning in technology-enhanced learning environments: lessons of a european peer review. European Journal of Education - Research, Development and Policies 41(3-4), 352–379 (2006)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Volet, S., Summers, M., Thurman, J.: High-level co-regulation in collaborative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction 19(2), 128–143 (2009)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Volet, S., Vauras, M., Salonen, P.: Self- and social regulation in learning contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist 44(4), 215–226 (2009)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Winters, F., Greene, J., Costich, C.: Self-regulation of learning within computer-based learning environments: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review 20(4), 429–444 (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Young, J.D.: The effect of self-regulated learning strategies on performance in learner controlled computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development 44(2), 17–27 (1996)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zimmerman, B.J., Martinez Pons, M.: Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Reasearch Journal 23(4), 614–628 (1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Kaplan
    • 1
  1. 1.CHArt-UPON -Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle- lab (EA 4004), Department of PsychologyWest Paris University (Université Paris 10)France

Personalised recommendations