Abstract
Despite the popularity of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC), recent studies have found that completion rates are low with some reported to be significantly lower than 10%. The low retention and completion rates are major concerns for educators and institutions. This paper investigates motivations for enrolling in a MOOC on the topic of ‘e-learning’ and discusses reasons for the attrition rates during the course. A survey of 134 students who had not completed the MOOC reveals that only 22% of the students had intended to complete the MOOC but was unable to due to various factors including academic and personal reasons. A big majority of the students indicated that changes in their job, insufficient time, difficulty with the subject matter and unchallenging activities are some of the reasons for the drop-out.
Keywords
- Massive Open Online Course
- Retention Rate
- Attrition Rate
- Completion Rate
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adamopoulos, A.: What Makes a Great MOOC? An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Student Retention in Online Courses. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Milan, Italy (2013)
Bean, J., Metzner, B.S.: A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition. Review of Educational Research 55, 485–540 (1985)
Berge, Z.L., Huang, Y.P.: A Model for Sustainable Student Retention: A Holistic Perspective on the Student Dropout Problem with Special Attention to e-Learning. DEOSNEWS 13(5) (May 2004)
Brooke, J.: SUS: A ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, London (1996)
Chamberlin, L., Parish, T.: MOOCs: Massive open online courses or massive and often obtuse courses? eLearn 8 (2011), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2016016.2016017 , doi:10.1145/2016016.2016017
Croft, N., Dalton, A., Grant, M.: Overcoming Isolation in Distance Learning: Building a Learning Community through Time and Space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment 5(1) (July 2010)
Daniel, J.: Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 18 (2012), http://jime.open.ac.uk/2012/18 (accessed February 26, 2013)
Hernández Rizzardini, R., Amado-Salvatierra, H., Gütl, C.: Cloud-based Learning Environments: Investigating learning activities experiences from Motivation, Usability and Emotional Perspective. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, Aachen, Germany (May 2013)
Hernández Rizzardini, R., Gütl, C., Chang, V., Morales, M.: MOOC in Latin America: Implementation and Lessons Learned. In: 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud (LTEC), Knowledge Management in Organizations, pp. 147–158. Springer Netherlands (2013)
Kay, R.H., Loverock, S.: Assessing emotions related to learning new software: The computer emotion scale. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 1605–1623 (2008)
Kizilcec, R.F., Piech, C., Schneider, E.: Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, Leuven, Belgium (2013), http://www.stanford.edu/~cpiech/bio/papers/deconstructingDisengagement.pdf . (accessed April 22, 2013)
Lee, Y., Choi, J., Kim, T.: Discriminating factors between completers of and dropouts from online learning courses. British Journal of Educational Technology 44(2), 328–337 (2013)
Liu, M., Kang, J., Cao, M., Lim, M., Ko, Y., Schmitz Weiss, A.: Understanding MOOCs as an Emerging Online Learning Tool: Perspectives from the Students. In: Proceedings of E-Learn (2013)
McAuley, A., Stewart, B., Siemens, G., Cormier, D.: The MOOC model for digital practice (2010), http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/MOOC_Final.pdf (accessed February 2, 2013)
Rodriguez, O.: The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses). Open Praxis 5(1), 67–73 (2013)
Rovai, A.P.: In search of higher persistence rates in distance education online programs. The Internet and Higher Education 6, 1–16 (2003), http://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid%3D1150160110784_1923299501_2758/rovai%25202003%2520persistenace%2520in%2520de%2520and%2520online%2520ed-%2520theory.pdf (accessed February 2, 2014)
Siemens, G.: MOOCs are really a platform. Elearnspace (2012), http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2012/07/25/moocs-are-really-a-platform/ (last edited July 25, 2012) (accessed 15 February 2013)
Tseng, S.C., Tsai, C.C.: Taiwan college students’ self-efficacy and motivation of learning in online peer-assessment environments. Internet and Higher Education 13, 164–169 (2010)
Willging, P.A., Johnson, S.D.: Factors that Influence Students’ Decision to Dropout of Online Courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(4) (December 2004)
Yang, D., Sinha, T., Adamson, D., Rose, C.P.: Turn on, Tune in, Drop out: Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses. In: NIPS Data-Driven Education Workshop (2013), http://lytics.stanford.edu/datadriveneducation/papers/yangetal.pdf (accessed February 2, 2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gütl, C., Rizzardini, R.H., Chang, V., Morales, M. (2014). Attrition in MOOC: Lessons Learned from Drop-Out Students. In: Uden, L., Sinclair, J., Tao, YH., Liberona, D. (eds) Learning Technology for Education in Cloud. MOOC and Big Data. LTEC 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10671-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10670-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10671-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)