Advertisement

MOOC User Persistence

Lessons from French Educational Policy Adoption and Deployment of a Pilot Course
  • Jean Heutte
  • Jonathan Kaplan
  • Fabien Fenouillet
  • Pierre-André Caron
  • Marilyne Rosselle
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 446)

Abstract

This research explores user persistence in a massive open online course (MOOC) that was set up as an experiment before the French Ministry of Higher Education and Research launched in October 2013 the French Digital University initiative–a French platform for MOOCs. Persistence was looked into from the perspective of emotions. Digital trail data, demographic data and data from six scales were analysed. The scales were Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scales (PANAS) plus the Flow in Education scales (EduFlow). Results show that many registrants logged on, participated in activities and accessed resources seldom, while a few persisted and were active. Correlations between persistence and residence in Europe or Africa were found as well as patterns relating to negative affect and to well-being, again linked to geographic variables.

Keywords

Massive open online course MOOC Persistence Well-being Affect Flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn, J., Butler, B.S., Alam, A., Webster, S.A.: Learner participation and engagement in open online courses: Insights from the peer 2 peer university. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 9(2), 160–171 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouffard, L., Lapierre, S.: La mesure du bonheur / the measurement of happiness. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie 18(2), 271–310 (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boyatt, R., Joy, M., Rocks, C., Sinclair, J.: What (use) is a MOOC? In: Uden, L., Tao, Y.H., Yang, H.C., Ting, I.H. (eds.) The 2nd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, pp. 133–145. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Caron, P.A., Heutte, J.: MOOC et gamification: vers une ingénierie de formation autotélique? In: 6e Conférence Environnements Informatiques pour l’Apprentissage Humain (EIAH 2013), Toulouse (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caron, P.A., Heutte, J., Rosselle, M.: Rapport d’expertise et accompagnement par la recherche du dispositif expérimental MOOC iNum, p. 78 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    French Government: Feuille de route pour le numérique (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F.: Propositions pour une mesure de l’expérience optimale (état de flow) en contexte éducatif. [proposals for measuring optimal experience (state of flow) in educational contexts]. In: 26e Congrès International d’Actualité de la Recherche en Éducation et en Formation (AREF), Université de Genève, Geneva (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heutte, J., Fenouillet, F., Boniwell, I., Martin-Krumm, C., Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Eduflow: Proposal for a new measure of flow in education (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ho, A.D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S.O., Seaton, D.T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., Chuang, I.: HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses, fall 2012-summer 2013 (harvardX and MITx working paper no. 1). SSRN Journal (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaplan, J.: Co-regulation in technology enhanced learning environments. In: Uden, L., et al. (eds.) The 3rd International Workshop on Learning Technology for Education in Cloud, pp. 72–81. Springer, Dordrecht (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Karsenti, T.: The MOOC - what the research says. International Journal of Technologies in Higher Education 10(2), 23–37 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R.P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., Molfenter, S.: Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping 17(3), 287–316 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist 37(2), 91–105 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., Perry, R.P.: Positive emotions in education. In: Frydenberg, E. (ed.) Beyond Coping: Meeting Goals, Visions, and Challenges, pp. 149–174. Elsevier, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rodriguez, O.: The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (massive open online courses). Open Praxis 5(1), 67–73 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosselle, M., Caron, P.A., Heutte, J.: A typology and dimensions of a description framework for MOOCs. In: The 2nd MOOC European Stakeholders Summit - EMOOCs, Lausanne, February 10-12 (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Heutte
    • 1
  • Jonathan Kaplan
    • 2
  • Fabien Fenouillet
    • 2
  • Pierre-André Caron
    • 1
  • Marilyne Rosselle
    • 3
  1. 1.CIREL -Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche en Education de Lille- Research Centre (EA 4354)Université Lille 1France
  2. 2.CHArt-UPON -Cognitions Humaine et Artificielle- lab (EA 4004), Department of PsychologyWest Paris University (Université Paris 10)France
  3. 3.MIS -Modélisation Information Systéme- Lab (EA 4290)Université de Picardie Jules Verne (UPJV)France

Personalised recommendations