Abstract
Trapping and dragging colloidal monolayers in two-dimensional optical lattices is offering the possibility to mimic friction between crystals (or even quasicrystals) visualizing directly the intimate mechanisms of sliding friction, with the additional possibility to change parameters freely, and to compare directly experiment with theory. Realistic simulations, which we review here, make a number of predictions about static features and dynamic sliding and reproduce well recent observations. Together, they provide a first demonstration of the potential impact of colloid dynamics in nanotribology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The spacing of the fully relaxed colloid configuration varies smoothly from \(a \simeq 0.984\) at the sample center to \(a\simeq 1.05\) at the periphery, with an average density equal to that of a triangular crystal of spacing \(a_\mathrm{coll}=1\).
- 2.
References
A. Vanossi, N. Manini, M. Urbakh, S. Zapperi, Tosatti E, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 529 (2013)
M. Urbakh, J. Klafter, D. Gourdon, J. Israelachvili, Nature (London) 430, 525 (2004)
T. Bohlein, J. Mikhael, C. Bechinger, Nat. Mater. 11, 126 (2012)
J. Mikhael, J. Roth, L. Helden, C. Bechinger, Nature (London) 454, 501 (2008)
J. Mikhael, M. Schmiedeberg, S. Rausch, J. Roth, H. Stark, C. Bechinger, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7214 (2010)
R.W. Carpick, M. Salmeron, Chem. Rev. 97, 1163 (1997)
A. Vanossi, E. Tosatti, Nat. Mater. 11, 97 (2012)
C. Reichhardt, C.J. Olson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 248301 (2002)
C. Reichhardt, C.J. Olson Reichhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060603 (2011)
O.M. Braun, YuS Kivshar, The Frenkel-Kontorova Model: Concepts, Methods, and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2004)
O.M. Braun, A.R. Bishop, J. Röder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3692 (1997)
A. Erdemir, J.-M. Martin (eds.), Superlubricity (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)
A. Vanossi, N. Manini, E. Tosatti, P. Natl, Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16429 (2012)
J. Hasnain, S. Jungblut, C. Dellago, Soft Matter 9, 5867 (2013)
I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 885964 (2008)
M. Brunner, C. Bechinger, W. Strepp, V. Lobaskin, H.H. von Grunberg, Europhys. Lett. 58, 926 (2002)
P.T. Korda, G.C. Spalding, D.G. Grier, Phys. Rev. B 66, 024504 (2002)
M.J. Ablowitz, B. Ilan, E. Schonbrun, R. Piestun, Phys. Rev. E 74, 035601 (2006)
P.S. Lomdahl, D.J. Srolovitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2702 (1986)
D.J. Srolovitz, P.S. Lomdahl, Physica D 23, 402 (1986)
Y.N. Gornostyrev, M.I. Katsnelson, A.V. Kravtsov, A.V. Trefilov, Phys. Rev. B 60, 1013 (1999)
O.M. Braun, M.V. Paliy, J. Röder, A.R. Bishop, Phys. Rev. E 63, 036129 (2001)
M. Peyrard, S. Aubry, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 16, 1593 (1983)
M. Dienwiebel, G.S. Verhoeven, N. Pradeep, J.W.M. Frenken, J.A. Heimberg, H.W. Zandbergen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 126101 (2004)
A.E. Filippov, M. Dienwiebel, J.W.M. Frenken, J. Klafter, M. Urbakh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 046102 (2008)
M. Reguzzoni, M. Ferrario, S. Zapperi, M.C. Righi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1311 (2010)
S.N. Coppersmith, D.S. Fisher, B.I. Halperin, P.A. Lee, W.F. Brinkman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 549 (1981)
P. Bak, Rep. Prog. Phys. 45, 587 (1982)
A. Patrykiejew, S. Sokołowski, T. Zientarski, K. Binder, Surf. Sci. 421, 308 (1999)
K. Mangold, P. Leiderer, C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 158302 (2003)
M. Cieplak, E.D. Smith, M.O. Robbins, Science 265, 1209 (1994)
T. Coffey, J. Krim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 076101 (2005)
M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity (McGraw Hill, New York, 1996)
G. Grüner, Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 1129 (1988)
T. Bohlein, C. Bechinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 058301 (2012)
A. Vanossi, N. Manini, G. Divitini, G.E. Santoro, E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 056101 (2006)
M. Cesaratto, N. Manini, A. Vanossi, E. Tosatti, G.E. Santoro, Surf. Sci. 601, 3682 (2007)
A. Vanossi, N. Manini, F. Caruso, G.E. Santoro, E. Tosatti, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 206101 (2007)
I.E. Castelli, R. Capozza, A. Vanossi, G.E. Santoro, N. Manini, E. Tosatti, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 174711 (2009)
A.D. Novaco, J.P. McTague, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1286 (1977)
G.V. Uîmin, L.N. Shur, JETP Lett. 28, 18 (1979)
J. Krim, D.H. Solina, R. Chiarello, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 181 (1991)
M.S. Tomassone, J.B. Sokoloff, A. Widom, J. Krim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4798 (1997)
C. Drummond, J. Israelachvili, Phys. Rev. E 63, 041506 (2001)
S.M. Rubinstein, G. Cohen, J. Fineberg, Nature (London) 430, 1005 (2004)
S.M. Rubinstein, G. Cohen, J. Fineberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 256103 (2006)
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with C. Bechinger, T. Bohlein, O.M. Braun, C. Dellago, M. Invernizzi, D. Mandelli, C. Reichhardt, G.E. Roat, and G.E. Santoro. This work is supported in part by COST Action MP1303, the Italian Ministry of University and Research, the Swiss National Science Foundation Sinergia CRSII2_136287, and the ERC Advanced Grant No. 320796-MODPHYSFRICT.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Static Configurations
Appendix: Static Configurations
Figures 19.9, 19.10, 19.11 display three overall views of the static fully relaxed \(F=0\) configurations for different values of \(a_\mathrm{lub}\) (or, equivalently, of \(\rho \)). These pictures represent the lowest-energy configurations of the three regions in the phase diagram—Fig. 19.7. Soliton/antisoliton patterns are highlighted by coloring colloids differently for different positions relative to the potential profile of Fig. 19.2: dark, bolder colloids occupy locally unfavorable repulsive regions for the corrugation profile \(W\). Figure 19.12 illustrates the antisoliton pattern for a larger amplitude of the corrugation \(U_0\), to be compared with Fig. 19.9 obtained with smaller corrugation. Note that the antisoliton lines are narrower in Fig. 19.12, but they form the same pattern as in Fig. 19.9.
Finally, Fig. 19.13 is to be compared with Fig. 19.9 to appreciate the effect of the random thermal motions characteristic of \(300\) K: (i) Brownian fluctuations smear the boundaries between in-registry and antisolitonic regions and (ii) a small thermal expansion is marked by a reduction in \(\rho \), and therefore in the separation between antisolitons.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vanossi, A., Manini, N., Tosatti, E. (2015). Driven Colloidal Monolayers: Static and Dynamic Friction. In: Gnecco, E., Meyer, E. (eds) Fundamentals of Friction and Wear on the Nanoscale. NanoScience and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10560-4_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10560-4_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10559-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10560-4
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)