Advertisement

‘Flipping’ the Postgraduate Classroom: Supporting the Student Experience

  • Sara SmithEmail author
  • Donna Brown
  • Emma Purnell
  • Jan Martin
Chapter
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 11)

Abstract

An enquiry was undertaken to evaluate whether the concept of ‘flipping the classroom’ to support the delivery of more specialised modules could be utilised at a postgraduate level. The fundamental idea behind this approach is that more time is dedicated to active learning with tutor support and feedback being provided for the students. A set of lectures was developed for the post-graduate module in Diagnostic Cellular Pathology using a lecture capture system. Evaluation of the ‘flipped classroom’ and traditional lecture sessions was undertaken, looking at their perceptions of each mode of delivery within the module; in particular focusing upon whether ‘flipping’ enabled students from a range of backgrounds and abilities to take a more active part within lecture sessions.. Using tutor contact time to support their application of knowledge to problems and case studies within the workshops allowed them to develop a greater depth of understanding of each topic covered and address any areas of concern. Further in-depth analysis shed light upon student engagement within the module and motivation to undertake further reading to ‘deepen’ knowledge within specific topics, and overall performance of the module.

Keywords

Flipped classroom Diagnostic cellular pathology Postgraduate classroom 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We wish to say a huge ‘thank you’ to all of the students who participated in the study.

References

  1. Armbruster P, Patel M, Johnson E, Weiss M. Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology CBE. Life Sci. Educ. 2009;8:203–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayers P. Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learn Instr. 2006;16(5):389–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates S, Galloway R. The inverted classroom in a large enrolment introductory physics course: a case study. 2012. HEA STEM. http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/stem-conference/PhysicalSciences/Simon_Bates_Ross_Galloway.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2013.
  4. Bergmann J, Sams A. Flip your classroom: reach every student in every class every day. USA: International Society for Technology in Education; 2012.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs J. Assessing learning quality: reconciling institutional, staff and educational demands. Assess Eval High Educ. 1996a;21(1):5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs J. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. High Educ. 1996b;32:347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at university. 2nd edn. UK: Open University Press; 2007.Google Scholar
  8. Charmaz K. A constrcutivist grounded theory analysis of losing and regaining a valued self. In: Wertz F, Charmaz K, McMullen L, Josselson R, Anderson R, McSpadden E, editors. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis. New York: The Guildford Press; 2011.Google Scholar
  9. Cousin G. Researching learning in higher education: an introduction to contemporary methods and approaches. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2009.Google Scholar
  10. Heron J, Reason P. The practice of co-operative inquiry: research with rather than on people. In: Reason P, Bradbury H, editors. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage; 2001.Google Scholar
  11. IBMS Criteria and Requirements for the Accreditation and Re-accreditation of MSc degrees in Biomedical Science. IBMS Professional Standards. http://www.ibms.org/go/qualifications/ibms-courses/accreditation. 2010. Accessed 5 June 2013.
  12. Kanuka H. Deliberative inquiry. In: Savin-Baden M, Howell Major C, editors. New approaches to qualitative research: wisdom and uncertainty. London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2010.Google Scholar
  13. Lage M, Platt G, Treglia M. Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. J Econ Educ. 2000;31(1):30–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008;63(8): 760–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Musallam R. The effects of using screencasting as a multimedia pre-training tool to manage the intrinsic cognitive load of chemical equilibrium instruction for advanced high school chemistry students (Doctoral dissertation). 2010. http://flipteaching.com/page7/index.php. Accessed 9 June 2013.
  16. Prince M. Does active learning work? A Review of the Research. J Eng Educ. 2004;93(3):223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prober C., Heath C. Lecture halls without lectures—a proposal for medical education. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(18):1657–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. QAA The framework for higher education qualifications in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. 2008. http://www.qaa.ac.uk/Publications/InformationAndGuidance/Documents/FHEQ08.pdf. Accessed 6 June 2013.
  19. Race P. The lecturer’s toolkit a practical guide to assessment, learning and teaching. 3rd edn. Oxon: Routledge; 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. 2nd edn. London: Routledge Farmer, Taylor & Francis Group; 2003.Google Scholar
  21. Reason P. Integrating action and reflectionthrough co-operative. Inq Manage Learn. 1999;30(2):207–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sherry M, Thomas, P, Chui WH. International students: a vulnerable student population. High Educ. 2010;60(1):33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stone B. Flip your classroom to increase active learning and engagement. 2012. 28th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI. http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference/Resource_library/proceedings/56511_2012.pdf. Accessed 9 June 2013.
  24. Zappe S, Leicht R, Messner J, Litzinger T, Woo LH. Flipping the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course proceedings, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exhibition. Austin, TX. 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Zhao C, Kuh GD. Adding value: learning communities and student engagement research in higher education. 2004;45(2):115–138Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Smith
    • 1
    Email author
  • Donna Brown
    • 2
  • Emma Purnell
    • 3
  • Jan Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Science and PhysiologyUniversity of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  2. 2.University of WolverhamptonWolverhamptonUK
  3. 3.Institute for Learning EnhancementUniversity of Wolverhampton’sWolverhamptonUK

Personalised recommendations