Advertisement

Palm, Wrist, Elbow – Digit II; Palm, Wrist, Elbow – Digit III

Surface Recording Technique, Antidromic Study
  • Giuliano Gentili
  • Mario Di Napoli
Chapter

Original Settings

Duration of pulse was 0.3 ms and the machine used was a Viking Myograph type IV (Nicolet Biomedical) electromyograph. Sensitivity, low-frequency filter, high-frequency filter, sweep speed, and rate of pulse were not specified.

Position

This study was performed in the supine position, with the hand manually fixed by the examiner to reduce movements and artifacts.

Recording

Following the antidromic method [ 1], the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAPs) were recorded using ring electrodes placed distally to digit II (index finger) and to digit III (middle finger). The active recording electrode was placed around the first interphalangeal joint for both the digit II and digit III recordings. The reference (R) electrode was placed distally at least 3 cm from the active recording electrode. Digit II and digit III recordings were performed separately (Figs. 1 and 2). The ground (G) electrode was placed between the stimulation and recording sites (the figure shows ground...

References

  1. 1.
    Kasius KM, Claes F, Verhagen WI, Meulstee J (2012) The segmental palmar test in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome reassessed. Clin Neurophysiol 123:2291–2295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Padua L, Lo Monaco M, Valente EM, Tonali PA (1996) A useful electrophysiologic parameter for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 19:48–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kimura I, Ayyar DR (1985) The carpal tunnel syndrome: electrophysiological aspects of 639 symptomatic extremities. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 25:151–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Simovic D, Weinberg DH (1997) Terminal latency index in the carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 20:1178–1180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson EW, Sipski M, Lammertse T (1987) Median and radial sensory latencies to digit I: normal values and usefulness in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:140–141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson EW, Kukla RD, Wongsam PE, Piedmont A (1981) Sensory latencies to the ring finger: normal values and relation to carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 62:206–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bland JDP (2000) A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23:1280–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuliano Gentili
    • 1
  • Mario Di Napoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurological ServiceS. Camillo de’ Lellis General HospitalRietiItaly

Personalised recommendations