Sensitivity was 20 μV/division, low-frequency filter was 20 Hz, high-frequency filter was 1.6 kHz, sweep speed was 0.5 ms/division, duration of pulse was 0.2 ms, and the machine used was a Dantec Cantata. Rate of pulse was not specified.
This study was performed in the supine position. The forearm, wrist, and hand were stabilized with Velcro on a comfortable board.
Following the orthodromic method [
1], the inching test was performed on sensory fibers of the median nerve in digit III (Fig.
1). The sensory potential was recorded with a bipolar fixed distance (2.2 cm) surface electrode (similar to that used for stimulation) moved centimeter by centimeter from a point 2 cm proximal to the distal wrist crease to a point 6 cm distal to the distal wrist crease, providing nine measurements (R1–R9). The proximal point (R1) was distal from the stimulating cathode (−) placed at digit III, proximal to the inferior palmar wrist crease. The distal point (R9) was...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Seror P (2000) Comparative diagnostic sensitivities of orthodromic or antidromic sensory inching test in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81:442–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar