Sensitivity was 5–50 μV/division, low-frequency filter was 20 Hz, high-frequency filter was 2 kHz, and the machine used was Nicolet Viking II electromyograph. Sweep speed, duration of pulse, and rate of pulse were not specified.
This study was performed in the supine position.
Three sets of nerve conduction studies were performed on each hand examined [
1]. The three studies were chosen based on reports in the literature indicating a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and because the units of measurement (latency difference between two sensory nerves) could be directly compared and/or added: (1)
median–ulnar (8 cm) midpalmar orthodromic (palmdiff) – following the orthodromic method (Fig.
1), the median and ulnar sensory nerve conduction studies were performed. Palm to wrist sensory conduction studies were done orthodromically at the wrist. The active electrode (A) was placed proximal to the distal crease at the wrist;...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L (1998) Strategies for analyzing nerve conduction data: superiority of a summary index over single tests. Muscle Nerve 21:1166–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lew HL, Wang L, Robinson LR (2000) Test-retest reliability of combined sensory index: implications for diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23:1261–1264PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Wang L (2000) Optimizing the number of tests for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23:1880–1882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar