Advertisement

Digit IV – Wrist

Surface Recording Technique, Orthodromic Study
  • Giuliano Gentili
  • Mario Di Napoli
Chapter

Original Settings

Sensitivity was 10 μV/division, low-frequency filter was 10 Hz, high-frequency filter was 2 kHz, and sweep speed was 1 ms/division. Duration of pulse, rate of pulse, and the machine used were not specified.

Position

This study was performed in the supine position.

Recording

Following the orthodromic method [ 1], the median and ulnar sensory nerve conduction studies were performed. For both the median and ulnar nerves, digit IV to the wrist sensory nerve conduction studies were done orthodromically at the wrist (Fig. 1). For both the median nerve (R1) and the ulnar nerve (R2), the active electrodes (A) were placed proximal to the distal crease at the wrist; the references (R) were placed proximally. For the median nerve (R1), electrodes were placed between the tendons of the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and the palmaris longus (PL) muscles. For the ulnar nerve (R2), electrodes were placed just lateral to the tendon of the flexor carpi ulnaris(FCU) muscle. Recording...

Keywords

Onset Latency Median Nerve Ulnar Nerve Latency Difference Median Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Uncini A, Lange DJ, Solomon M et al (1989) Ring finger testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: a comparative study of diagnostic utility. Muscle Nerve 12:735–741PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uncini A, Di Muzio A, Awad J et al (1993) Sensitivity of three median to ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 16:1366–1373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Foresti C, Quadri S, Rasella M et al (1996) Carpal tunnel syndrome: which electrodiagnostic path should we follow? A prospective study of 100 consecutive patients. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 36:377–384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Valls J, Llanas JM (1988) Orthodromic study of the sensory fibers innervating the fourth finger. Muscle Nerve 11:546–552PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Preston DC, Ross MH, Kothari MJ et al (1994) The median-ulnar latency difference studies are comparable in mild carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 176:1469–1471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Capone L, Pentore R, Lunazzi C et al (1998) Pitfalls in using the ring finger test alone for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Ital J Neurol Sci 19:387–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bland JDP (2000) A neurophysiological grading scale for carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve 23:1280–1283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuliano Gentili
    • 1
  • Mario Di Napoli
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurological ServiceS. Camillo de’ Lellis General HospitalRietiItaly

Personalised recommendations