Advertisement

Time and the Algebraic Theory of Moments

  • B. J. HileyEmail author
Chapter
Part of the On Thinking book series (ONTHINKING, volume 4)

Abstract

We introduce the notion of an extended moment in time, the duron. This is a region of temporal ambiguity which arises naturally in the nature of process which we take to be basic. We introduce an algebra of process and show how it is related to, but different from, the monoidal category introduced by Abramsky and Coecke. By considering the limit as the duration of the moment approaches the infinitesimal, we obtain a pair of dynamical equations, one expressed in terms of a commutator and the other which is expressed in terms of an anti-commutator. These two coupled real equations are equivalent to the Schrödinger equation and its dual.

We then construct a bi-algebra, which allows us to make contact with the thermal quantum field theory introduced by Umezawa. This allows us to link quantum mechanics with thermodynamics. This approach leads to two types of time, one is Schrödinger time, the other is an irreversible time that can be associated with a movement between inequivalent vacuum states. Finally we discuss the relation between our process algebra and the thermodynamic origin of time.

Keywords

Jacobi Equation Monoidal Category Classical World Quantum Phenomenon Quantum Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the members of the TPRU for their invaluable help in trying to straighten out the ideas expressed in this paper. I would like to thank Albrecht von Müller and Thomas Filk for inviting me to participate in their stimulating meeting at the Parmenides Foundation in Munich.

References

  1. 1.
    Abramsky S, Coceke B (2004) A categorical semantics of quantum protocol. In: Proceedings of the 19th annual IEEE symposium on logic in computer science, IEEE Computer Science Press, USA. Also available at arXiv:cs/0402130Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baker GA (1958) Formulation of quantum mechanics based on the quasi-probability distribution induced on phase space. Phys Rev 109:2198–2206CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bohm D (1965) Space, time and the quantum theory understood in terms of discrete structure process. In: Proceedings of the international conference on elementary particles, KyotoGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bohm D, Hiley BJ, Stuart AEG (1970) On a new mode of description in physics. Int J Theor Phys 3:171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bohm D (1980) Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bohm D, Hiley BJ (1981) On a quantum algebraic approach to a generalised phase space. Found Phys 11:179–203CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bohm D (1986) Time, the implicate order, and pre-space. In: Griffin DR (ed) Physics and the ultimate significance of time. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 177–208Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bohm D (1987) The implicate order and Prigogine’s notions of irreversibility. Found Phys 17:667–677CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bohm D, Hiley BJ (1993) The undivided universe: an ontological interpretation of quantum theory. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bohr N (1961) Atomic physics and human knowledge. Science Editions, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown MR, Hiley BJ (2000) Schrödinger revisited: an algebraic approach. arXiv: quant-ph/0005025Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Celeghini E, Rasetti M, Vitiello G (1992) Quantum dissipation. Ann Phys 215:156–170CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Celeghini E, De Martino S, De Siena S, Iorio A, Rasetti M, Vitiello G (1998) Thermo field dynamics and quantum algebras. Phys Lett A244:455–461.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Coecke B (2005) Kindergarten quantum mechanics. arXiv: quant-ph/0510032.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Connes A (1990) Noncommutative geometry. Academic Press, San DiegozbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Connes A, Rovelli C (1994) Von Neumann algebra automorphisms and time-thermodynamics relation in general covariant quantum theories. Classical Quantum Gravity 11:2899–2917CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cramer JG (1986) The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 58:647–687CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dahl JP (1983) Dynamical equations for the wigner function. In: Hinze J (ed) Energy storage and redistribution in molecules. Plenum Press, New York, pp 557–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dirac PAM (1939) A new notation for quantum mechanics. Math Proc Cambridge Phil Soc 35:416–418. doi:10.1017/S0305004100021162CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dirac PAM (1947) The principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford University Press, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eddington A (1958) The philosophy of physical science. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Emch GG (1972) Algebraic methods in statistical mechanics and quantum field theory. Wiley-Interscience, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fairlie DB, Manogue CA (1991) The formulation of quantum mechanics in terms of phase space functions-the third equation. J Phys A: Math Gen 24:3807–3815CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Feynman RP (1948) Space–time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Rev Mod Phys 20:367–387CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Feynman RP, Hibbs AR (1965) Quantum mechanics and path integrals. McGraw-Hill, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fichte JG (1994) Introductions to the Wissencschaftslehre and other writings (Translated by Breazeale D). Hackett Publishers, Indianapolis, p 26Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    George C, Prigogine I (1979) Physica A99:369–382CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    George C, Henin F, Mayne F, Prigogine I (1978) Hadronic J 1:520–573MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Galapon EA (2002) Self-adjoint time operator is the rule for discrete semi-bounded Hamiltonians. Proc R Soc Lond A 458:2671–2689. doi:10.1098/rspa.2002.0992CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Galapon EA (2009) Theory of quantum arrival and spatial wave function collapse on the appearance of particle. Proc R Soc A 465:71–86. doi:10.1098/rspa.2008.0278CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Goldstein H (1950) Classical mechanics. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Gosson M (2001) The principles of newtonian and quantum mechanics. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Gosson M (2006) Symplectic geometry and quantum mechanics. Birkhäuser Verlag, BaselCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Grassmann H (1995) A new branch of mathematics: the Ausdehnungslehre of 1844, and other works (trans. by Kannenberg LC). Open Court, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hamilton WR (1967) In: Halberstam H, Ingram RE (eds) Mathematical papers. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Heisenberg W (1925) Quantum-theoretic re-interpretation of kinematic and mechanical relations. Z Phys 33:879–893CrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hiley BJ (1991) Vacuum or holomovement. In: Saunders S, Brown HR (eds) The philosophy of vacuum. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 217–249Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hiley BJ (1994) The algebra of process. In: Consciousness at the crossroads of cognative science and philosophy, Maribor, pp 52–67Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hiley BJ, Fernandes M (1997) Process and time. In: Atmanspacher H, Ruhnau E (eds) Time, temporality and now. Springer, Berlin, pp 365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hiley BJ (2002) From the Heisenberg picture to Bohm: a new perspective on active information and its relation to Shannon information. In: Khrennikov A (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on quantum theory: reconsideration of foundations. Växjö University Press, Sweden, pp 141–162Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hiley BJ (2003) Algebraic quantum mechanics, algebraic Spinors and Hilbert space. In: Bowden KG (ed) Boundaries, scientific aspects of ANPA 24. ANPA, London, pp 149–186Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hiley BJ (2004) Phase space description of quantum phenomena. In: Krennikov A (ed) Quantum theory: reconsiderations of foundations-2. Växjö University Press, Växjö, pp 267–286Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hiley BJ, Quantum reality unveiled through process and the implicate order. In: Bruza PD, Lawless W, van Rijsbergen K, Sofge DA, Coecke B, Clark S (eds) Proceedings of the second quantum interaction symposium [QI-2008]. College Publications, London, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hiley BJ (2011) Process, distinction, groupoids and Clifford algebras: an alternative view of the quantum formalism. In: Coecke B (ed) New structures for physics. Lecture notes in physics, vol 813. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 705–750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hiley BJ, Callaghan RE (2012) Clifford algebras and the Dirac–Bohm quantum Hamilton–Jacobi equation. Found Phys 42:192–208. doi:10.1007/s10701-011-9558-zCrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Iorio A, Vitiello G (1995) Quantum dissipation and quantum groups. Ann Phys (NY) 241:496–506CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jones V (1999) Planar algebras 1. maths/9909027Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kauffman LH (1980) Complex numbers and algebraic logic. In: 10th international symposium multiple valued logic. IEEE Publication, USAGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kauffman LH (1982) Sign and space. In: Religious experience and scientific paradigms, Proceedings of the IAWSR conference on Inst. Adv. Stud. World Religions. Stony Brook, New York, pp 118–164Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kauffman LH (1987) Self-reference and recursive forms. J Social Bio Struct 10:53–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kauffman SA (1996) Lecture 7. In: Investigations: the nature of autonomous agents and the worlds they mutually createGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Landi G (1997) An introduction to noncommutative spaces and their geometries. Lecture notes in physics, Monograph 51. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Lewis GN (1926) Light waves and light corpuscles. Nature 117:236–238CrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lewis GN (1926) The nature of light. Proc Nat Acad Sci 12:22–29CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moyal JE (1949) Quantum mechanics as a statistical theory. Proc Cambridge Phil Soc 45:99–123CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Parker-Rhodes AF (1981) The theory of indistinguishables. Reidel, DordrechtCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Pauli W (1958) In: Flugge S (ed) Handbuch der Physik (Encyclopedia of physics), vol 5. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–168Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Peres A (1980) Measurement of time by quantum clocks. Am J Phys 48:552–557CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Prigogine I (1980) From being to becoming. Freeman, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Raptis I, Zapatrin RR (2001) Algebraic description of spacetime foam. Classical Quantum Gravity 18:4187–4212CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Rovelli C (1993) Statistical mechanics of gravity and the thermodynamical origin of time. Classical Quantum Gravity 10:1549–1566CrossRefADSzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Schelling FWJ (2010) Von Der Weltseele: Eine Hypothese Der Hohern Physik Zur Erklarung Des Allgemeinen Organismus. Nabu Press, CharlestonGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Spencer-Brown G (1969) Laws of form. George Allen and Unwin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Synge JL (1960) Relativity: the general theory. North-Holland, AmsterdamzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Umezawa H (1993) Advanced field theory: micro, macro and thermal physics. AIP, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Vitiello G (1995) Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model. Int J Mod Phys 9B:973–989CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Vitiello G (1996) Living matter physics and the quantum brain model. Phys Essays 9:548–555CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Whitehead AN (2004) The concept of nature. Dover, New York, p 72Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zapatrin RR (2001) Incidence algebras of simplicial complexes. Pure Math Appl 11:105–118MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.TPRU, BirkbeckUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations