Skip to main content

Wireless Routing Protocols for NANs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wireless Communications Networks for the Smart Grid

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Computer Science ((BRIEFSCOMPUTER))

  • 953 Accesses

Abstract

In order to determine suitable routing protocols for the SGCN, this chapter surveys various existing routing protocols designed for wireless mesh networks. The focus is given to protocols that could be used for the NAN which is the most important segment of the SGCN. Based on this survey, the main operating principles along with weaknesses and strengths of the two candidate routing protocols are presented. Specifically, the Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) and the Routing Protocol for Low Power and Lossy Networks (RPL) are chosen to represent the location-based and self-organizing coordinate routing protocols, respectively. Finally, since the robustness is one of the key requirements of the NAN, this chapter presents a proactive parent switching (PPS) scheme, as an extension for RPL, to handle network element failures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Alotaibi and B. Mukherjee, “A survey on routing algorithms for wireless ad-hoc and mesh networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 56, no. 2, Feb. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Watteyne et al., “From MANET to IETF ROLL standardization: A paradigm shift in WSN routing protocols,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 688–707, Jan. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  3. “Overview of existing routing protocols for low power and lossy networks,” IETF ROLL, IETF draft, draft-ietf-roll-protocols-survey-07 (work in progress), Apr. 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Akkaya and M. Younis, “A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 325–349, Nov. 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Abolhasan, T. A. Wysocki, and E. Dutkiewicz, “A review of routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jan. 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. N. Al-Karaki and A. E. Kamal, “Routing techniques in wireless sensor networks: A survey,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 6–28, Dec. 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. C. Tseng, Y. S. C. S.-Y. Ni, and S. Jang-Ping, “The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network,” Wireless Networks, vol. 8, no. 2/3, pp. 153–167, 2002.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. W. B. Heinzelman, A. P. Chandrakasan, and H. Balakrishnan, “An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 1, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Z. Zhou et al., “Energy-efficient cooperative communication in a clustered wireless sensor network,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 57, no. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. O. Younis, M. Krunz, and S. Ramasubramanian, “Node clustering in wireless sensor networks: Recent developments and deployment challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 20, no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. Younis and S. Fahmy, “HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks,” IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 3, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Manjeshwar and D. P. Agrawal, “TEEN: a routing protocol for enhanced efficiency in wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Computing Issues in Wireless Networks and Mobile Computing, Apr. 2001, pp. 2009–2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. —, “APTEEN: A hybrid protocol for efficient routing and comprehensive information retrieval in wireless sensor networks source,” in Proc. International on Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, Apr. 2002, pp. 195–202.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Boukerche, R. W. Pazzi, and R. Araujo, “Fault-tolerant wireless sensor network routing protocols for the supervision of context-aware physical environments,” Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, vol. 66, no. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. I. Stojmenovic and S. Olariu, Handbook of Sensor Networks: Algorithms and Architectures. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Bose et al., “Routing with guaranteed delivery in ad hoc wireless networks,” in Proc. 3rd ACM Int. Workshop on Discrete Algorithms and Methods for Mobile Computing and Communications (DIAL), Seattle, WA, USA, Aug. 1999, pp. 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Karp and H. Kung, “GPSR: greedy perimeter stateless routing for wireless networks,” in Proc. Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Boston, MA, USA, Aug. 2000, pp. 243–254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Frey and I. Stojmenovic, “On delivery guarantees of face and combined greedy-face routing algorithms in ad hoc and sensor networks,” in Proc. 12th ACM Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2006, pp. 390–401.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Elhafsi, N. Mitton, and D. Simplot-Ryl, “End-to-end energy efficient geographic path discovery with guaranteed delivery in ad hoc and sensor networks,” in Proc. 19th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Cannes, France, 2008, pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Kalosha et al., “Select-and-protest-based beaconless georouting with guaranteed delivery in wireless sensor networks,” in Proc. 27th Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Phoenix, AZ, USA, Apr. 2008, pp. 346–350.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Q. D. Ho, Y. Gao, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Challenges and research opportunities in wireless communications networks for smart grid,” IEEE Wireless Communications, pp. 89–95, Jun. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Q. D. Ho and T. Le-Ngoc. Smart grid communications networks: Wireless technologies, protocols, issues and standards, Chapter 5 in Handbook on Green Information and Communication Systems (Editors: S. O. Mohammad, A. Alagan, and W. Isaac), Elsevier, Summer 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. Saputro, K. Akkaya, and S. Uludag, “A survey of routing protocols for smart grid communications,” Computer Networks, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2742–2771, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B. Lichtensteiger et al., “RF mesh system for smart metering: System architecture and performance,” in Proc. IEEE Smart Grid Communication, Mayland, USA, Oct. 2010, pp. 379–384.

    Google Scholar 

  25. G. Rajalingham, Q. D. Ho, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Evaluation of an efficient smart grid communication system at the neighbor area level,” in Proc. the 11th Annual IEEE Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC 2014), Las Vegas, USA, 9–13 Jan. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  26. G. Rajalingham, Q. D. Ho, and T. Le-Ngoc, “Attainable throughput, delay and scalability for geographic routing on smart grid neighbor area networks,” in Proc. the 2013 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC 2013), Shanghai, China, 7–10 Apr. 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Ko et al., “Evaluating the performance of RPL and 6LoWPAN in TinyOS,” in Proc. of the Workshop on Extending the Internet to Low power and Lossy Networks (IP+SN), Chicago, IL, USA, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  28. O. Gnawali et al., “Collection tree protocol,” in Proc. the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys), Nov. 2009, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. Nucolone, “Stability analysis of the delays of the routing protocol over low power and lossy networks,” Master’s thesis, KTH Electrical Engineering, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Wang et al., “RPL based routing for advanced metering infrastructure in smart grid,” Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Tech. Rep. TR2010-053, Jul. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  31. P. Kulkarni et al., “A self-organising mesh networking solution based on enhanced RPL for smart metering communications,” in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Jun. 2011, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. Tripathi, J. C. de Oliveira, and J. P. Vasseur, “Applicability study of RPL with local repair in smart grid substation networks,” in n Proc. the First IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Oct. 2010, pp. 262–267.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Q.D Ho, Y. Gao, G. Rajalingham, T. Le-Ngoc, “Performance and applicability of candidate routing protocols for smart grid’s wireless mesh neighbor area networks,” in Proc. the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC 2014), Sydney, Australia, 10–14 Jun. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  34. “RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6550, March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  35. “Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks,” Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), RFC 6551, March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. D. Korte, A. Sehgal, and J. Schonwalder, “A study of the RPL repair process using ContikiRPL,” in Proc. the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Infrastucture, Management and Security (AIMS), Jun. 2012, pp. 50–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ho, QD., Gao, Y., Rajalingham, G., Le-Ngoc, T. (2014). Wireless Routing Protocols for NANs. In: Wireless Communications Networks for the Smart Grid. SpringerBriefs in Computer Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10347-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10347-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10346-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10347-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics