Studying Gamification: The Effect of Rewards and Incentives on Motivation

Chapter

Abstract

Gamification is the use of game design elements in non-game contexts to encourage a desired type of behavior. In recent years gamification systems have been applied in marketing as well as non-business contexts such as politics, health, or interactive systems and education.

Although gamification is a new concept, it is gaining momentum; technology industry research firm Gartner estimates that by 2015, some 50 % of large companies will use the techniques for at least one business process, and M2 Research estimates revenue from gamification software, consulting and marketing will reach $938 million by 2014, up from less than $100 million in 2011.

The objective in this chapter is to form theoretical principles for gamification in practice. Based on the role of rewards and incentives on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, we offer a framework for building feedback mechanisms. The chapter is built upon three components: a model of motivation in games; an overview of incentives and rewards used in games and their role in creating motivation, while tying these rewards into the motivation model; classifying game achievements according to their characteristics (tangibility, exchangeability etc.). Finally some future research directions are presented.

Keywords

Motivation Rewards Incentives Gamification Serious Games 

References

  1. Antin, J., & Churchill, E. F. (2011). Badges in social media: A social psychological perspective. Paper presented at the CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, J. W., & Litwin, G. H. (1960). Achievement motive and test anxiety conceived as motive to approach success and motive to avoid failure. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60(1), 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bielik, P. (2012). Integration and adaptation of motivational factors into software systems. In M. Barla, M. Šimko, J. Tvarozek (Ed.), Personalized Web - Science, Technologies and Engineering: 11th Spring 2012 PeWe Workshop Modra - Piesok, Slovakia April 1, 2012 Proceedings (pp. 31–32). Bratislava: Nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
  6. Bleumers, L., All, A., Mariën, I., Schurmans, D., Van Looy, J., Jacobs, A., et al. (2012). State of play of digital games for empowerment and inclusion: A review of the literature and empirical cases No. JRC77655. Spain: JRC Technical Reports Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.Google Scholar
  7. Bogost, I. (2011). Gamification is bullshit: My position statement at the Wharton Gamification Symposium. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://www.bogost.com/blog/gamification_is_bullshit.shtml
  8. Bostan, B. (2009). Player motivations: A psychological perspective. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 7(2). Article 22.Google Scholar
  9. Breuer, J. S., & Bente, G. (2010). Why so serious? On the relation of serious games and learning. Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, J. (2007). Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM, 50(4), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22(1), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivation in education: Reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model. Presented at Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts, a workshop at CHI 2011. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/09-Deterding.pdf
  17. Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L. E., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. Paper presented at the CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://hci.usask.ca/publications/view.php?id=219
  18. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Using Game Design Elements in Non-Gaming Contexts. In Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ‘11 (pp. 2425–2428). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  19. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farzan, R., DiMicco, J. M., Millen, D. R., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., & Brownholtz, E. A. (2008). Results from deploying a participation incentive mechanism within the enterprise. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 563–572), Florence, Italy.Google Scholar
  21. Federoff, M. A. (2002). Heuristics and usability guidelines for the creation and evaluation of fun in video games. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Telecommunications, Indiana University, Bloomington.Google Scholar
  22. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flatla, D., Gutwin, C., Nacke, L., Bateman, S., & Mandryk, R. (2011). Calibration games: Making calibration tasks enjoyable by adding motivating game elements. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 403–412), Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
  24. Fu, Y. C. (2011). The game of life: Designing a gamification system to increase current volunteer participation and retention in volunteer-based nonprofit organizations. Undergraduate Student Research Awards. Paper 2. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/infolit_usra/2]
  25. Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation and Gaming, 33(4), 441–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gartner Group. (2011). Gartner says by 2015, more than 50 percent of organizations that manage innovation processes will gamify those processes. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/1629214
  27. Gilbert, D. T., Giesler, R. B., & Morris, K. A. (1995). When comparisons arise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(2), 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gillison, F., Standage, M., & Skevington, S. (2006). Relationships among adolescents’ weight perceptions, exercise goals, exercise motivation, quality of life and leisure-time exercise behaviour: A self-determination theory approach. Health Education Research, 21(6), 836–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gnauk, B., Dannecker, L., & Hahmann, M. (2012). Leveraging gamification in demand dispatch systems. Proceedings of the 2012 Joint EDBT/ICDT Workshops (pp. 103–110).Google Scholar
  30. Granzin, K. L., & Mason, M. J. (1999). Motivating participation in exercise: Using personal investment theory. Advances in Consumer Research, 26, 101–106.Google Scholar
  31. Greitzer, F. L., Kuchar, O. A., & Huston, K. (2007). Cognitive science implications for enhancing training effectiveness in a serious gaming context. Journal on Educational Resources in Computing (JERIC), 7(3). Article 2.Google Scholar
  32. Hacker, S., & Von Ahn, L. (2009). Matchin: Eliciting user preferences with an online game. CHI ‘09: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York (pp. 1207–1216).Google Scholar
  33. Halavais, A. M. C. (2012). A genealogy of badges. Information, Communication & Society, 15(3), 354–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011). Framework for designing and evaluating game achievements. Think Design Play: The Fifth International Conference of the Digital Research Association (DIGRA) (pp. 122–134), Hilversum, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  35. Hamari, J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2010). Game design as marketing: How game mechanics create demand for virtual goods. International Journal of Business Science & Applied Management, 5(1), 14–29.Google Scholar
  36. Hou, J. (2011). Uses and gratifications of social games: Blending social networking and game play. First Monday, 16(7). Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3517/3020.
  37. Hsu, C. L., & Lu, H. P. (2004). Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Information & Management, 41(7), 853–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jablonsky, S. F., & DeVries, D. L. (1972). Operant conditioning principles extrapolated to the theory of management. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7(2), 340–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson, G. T., Boonthum, C., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). iSTART-ME: Situating extended learning within a game-based environment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at the 14th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education AIED 09 (pp. 59–68). Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  40. Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., et al. (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18(10), 1175–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Konrad, A. (2011). Inside the gamification gold rush. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://tech.fortune.cnn.com/2011/10/17/gamification/
  42. Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 311–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krause, M., & Smeddinck, J. (2011). Human computation games: A survey. Proceedings of 19th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO 2011) (pp. 754–758). Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  44. Kruglanski, A. W., & Mayseless, O. (1990). Classic and current social comparison research: Expanding the perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 108(2), 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2). Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://www.gamifyingeducation.org/files/Lee-Hammer-AEQ-2011.pdf.
  46. Leemkuil, H., Jong, T., & Ootes, S. (2000). Review of educational use of games and simulations No. Project number IST-1999-13078. University of Twente: KITS consortium, IST fifth framework programme.Google Scholar
  47. Lillienfeld, S. O., Lynn, S. J., Namy, L. L., & Woolf, N. J. (2009). Psychology: From inquiry to understanding. Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Ling, K., Beenen, G., Ludford, P., Wang, X., Chang, K., Li, X., et al. (2005). Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 212–221).Google Scholar
  49. Liu, Y., Alexandrova, T., & Nakajima, T. (2011). Gamifying intelligent environments. Proceedings of the 2011 International ACM Workshop on Ubiquitous Meta User Interfaces (pp. 7–12). Scottsdale, AZ.Google Scholar
  50. Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. (1981). Goal setting and task performance: 1969–1980. Psychological Bulletin, 90(1), 125–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? heuristics for designing instructional computer games. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSMALL Symposium and the First SIGPC Symposium on Small Systems (pp. 162–169), Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  52. Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McDonald, P. (2010). Game over? When play becomes mechanical. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://planninginhighheels.com/2010/11/25/game-over-when-play-becomes-mechanical/
  55. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York, NY, Pinguin Press.Google Scholar
  56. McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Intelligent tutoring and games (ITaG). Proceedings of the Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at the 14th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 1–10), Brighton, UK.Google Scholar
  57. McNamara, D. S., Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. (2010). Intelligent tutoring and games (| TaG). Y. Baek (Ed.) Gaming for classroom-based learning: Digital role playing as a motivator of study (pp. 44–65). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  58. Medler, B. (2009). Generations of game analytics, achievements and high scores. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 3(2), 177–194.Google Scholar
  59. Medler, B. (2011). Player dossiers: Analyzing gameplay data as a reward. Game Studies Journal, 11(1). Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://gamestudies.org/1101/articles/medler.
  60. Medler, B., John, M., & Lane, J. (2011). Data cracker: Developing a visual game analytic tool for analyzing online gameplay. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ‘11) (pp. 2365–2374), Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  61. Medler, B., & Magerko, B. (2011). Analytics of play: Using information visualization and gameplay practices for visualizing video game data. Parsons Journal for Information Mapping, 3(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  62. Montola, M., Nummenmaa, T., Lucero, A., Boberg, M., & Korhonen, H. (2009). Applying game achievement systems to enhance user experience in a photo sharing service. Proceedings of the 13th International MindTrek Conference: Everyday Life in the Ubiquitous Era (pp. 94–97), Tampere, Finland.Google Scholar
  63. Muntean, C. I. (2011). Raising engagement in e-learning through gamification. Proceedings 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning ICVL (pp. 323–329), Cluj-Napoca, Romania, Europe.Google Scholar
  64. Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. OUPblog. (2011). Oxford dictionaries word of the year 2011: Squeezed middle. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://blog.oup.com/2011/11/squeezed-middle/
  66. Pavlas, D. (2010). A model of flow and play in game-based learning: The impact of game characteristics, player traits, and player states. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  67. Pavlas, D., Heyne, K., Bedwell, W., Lazzara, E., & Salas, E. (2010). Game-based learning: The impact of flow state and videogame self-efficacy. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA. 54(28), 2398–2402.Google Scholar
  68. Pavlas, D., Jentsch, F., Salas, E., Fiore, S. M., & Sims, V. (2012). The play experience scale development and validation of a measure of play. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 54(2), 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Peng, W. (2008). The mediational role of identification in the relationship between experience mode and self-efficacy: Enactive role-playing versus passive observation. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(6), 649–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Przybylski, A. K., Rigby, C. S., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). A motivational model of video game engagement. Review of General Psychology, 14(2), 154–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Raban, D. R., & Geifman, D. (2009). Place your bets! information aggregation and prediction markets in MBA courses. Proceedings of the Chais Conference on Instructional Technologies Research 2009: Learning in the Technological Era (pp. 153–158), Raanana, Israel: The Open University of Israel.Google Scholar
  72. Raban, D. R., & Harper, F. (2008). Motivations for answering questions online. In D. Caspi & T. Azran (Eds.), New media and innovative technologies (pp. 73–97). Israel: Ben- Gurion University press.Google Scholar
  73. Rafaeli, S., Raban, D., Ravid, G., & Noy, A. (2003). Online simulations in management education about information and its uses. In C. Wankel, & R. DeFillippi (Eds.), Educating managers with tomorrow’s technologies (pp. 53–80). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  74. Ravid, G., & Rafaeli, S. (2000). Multi player, internet and java-based simulation games: Learning and research in implementing a computerized version of the “beer-distribution supply chain game”. Simulation Series, 32(2), 15–22.Google Scholar
  75. Reeves, B., & Read, J. L. (2009). Total engagement: Using games and virtual worlds to change the way people work and businesses compete. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rieber, L. P. (1996). Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games. Educational Technology Research and Development, 44(2), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. K. (2009). Virtual worlds and the learner hero: How today’s video games can inform tomorrow’s digital learning environments. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Robertson, M. (2010). Can’t play, won’t play. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://hideandseek.net/2010/10/06/cant-play-wont-play/
  79. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ryan, R. M., Rigby, C. S., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The motivational pull of video games: A self-determination theory approach. Motivation and Emotion, 30(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schilling, T. A., & Hayashi, C. T. (2001). Achievement motivation among high school basketball and cross-country athletes: A personal investment perspective. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 13(1), 103–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the german, spanish, and chinese versions of the general self-efficacy scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shepperd, J. A. (2001). Social loafing and expectancy-value theory. In S. G. Harkins (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on the effects of evaluation on performance (pp. 1–24). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shneiderman, B. (2004). Designing for fun: How can we design user interfaces to be more fun? Interactions, 11(5), 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Siang, A. C., & Rao, R. K. (2003). Theories of learning: A computer game perspective. Proceedings of the IEEE Fifth International Symposium on Multimedia Software Engineering (ISMSE’03) (pp. 239–245). Taichung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  89. Skinner, B. F. (1957). The experimental analysis of behavior. American Scientist, 45(4), 343–371.Google Scholar
  90. Suls, J., Martin, R., & Wheeler, L. (2002). Social comparison: Why, with whom, and with what effect? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(5), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Susi, T., Johannesson, M., & Backlund, P. (2007). Serious games—An overview (Technical Report No. HS- IKI -TR-07-001). Skövde, Sweden: School of Humanities and Informatics, University of Skövde.Google Scholar
  92. Sweetser, P., & Wyeth, P. (2005). GameFlow: A model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 3(3), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Thom, J., Millen, D., & DiMicco, J. (2012). Removing gamification from an enterprise SNS. Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1067–1070). Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  94. Vaijayanthi, I., & Marur, M. (2012). Persuasive design for energy saving behavior through social gaming. Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (DeSForM) Conference, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
  95. Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., De Witte, H., & Feather, N. T. (2005). Understanding unemployed people’s job search behaviour, unemployment experience and well-being: A comparison of expectancy-value theory and self-determination theory. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 269–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Vassileva, J. (2012). Motivating participation in social computing applications: A user modeling perspective. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22(1), 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. von Ahn, L. (2009). Human computation. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Design Automation Conference (pp. 418–419), San Francisco.Google Scholar
  98. von Ahn, L., & Dabbish, L. (2008). Designing games with a purpose. Communications of the ACM, 51(8), 58–67.Google Scholar
  99. Vorderer, P., Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2003). Explaining the enjoyment of playing video games: The role of competition. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Entertainment Computing (pp. 1–9), Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  100. Vukovic, M., Laredo, J., & Rajagopal, S. (2010). Challenges and experiences in deploying enterprise crowdsourcing service. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Engineering (pp. 460–467), Vienna.Google Scholar
  101. Wang, C. K. J., Khoo, A., Liu, W. C., & Divaharan, S. (2008). Passion and intrinsic motivation in digital gaming. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11(1), 39–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6(1), 49–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy—value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wood, J. V. (1989). Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wu, M. (2012). The gamification backlash + two long term business strategies. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from http://lithosphere.lithium.com/t5/science-of-social-blog/The-Gamification-Backlash-Two-Long-Term-Business-Strategies/ba-p/30891
  106. Xu, Y. (2011). Literature review on web application gamification and analytics (Technical Report No. 11-05). University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI: CSDL Technical Report. Retrieved January 25, 2014, from https://csdl-techreports.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/techreports/2011/11-05/11-05.pdf
  107. Yee, N. (2006a). The labor of fun: How video games blur the boundaries of work and play. Games and Culture: A Journal of Interactive Media, 1(1), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Yee, N. (2006b). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9(6), 772–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ganit Richter
    • 1
  • Daphne R. Raban
    • 1
  • Sheizaf Rafaeli
    • 1
  1. 1.The Center for Internet Research and LINKS I-CORE ProgramFaculty of Management, University of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations