Abstract
Modern STEM education is mainly grounded in constructivism. It requires instructors to not only recite learning content, but also to teach the concepts and ideas behind abstract formulas. Interactive simulations are one of the most powerful tools for increasing the students’ problem-solving abilities, and enhancing their understanding of conceptual models and formulas, which are hard to visualize without technology-enhanced tools. Creating simulation tools of interest to students has the potential to enhance their understanding of the phenomena and increase their interest in science. However, many simulations are not engaging and students will lose interest in interacting with them after a short time. Hence, it is important to advance in particular the motivational design aspects of such educational tools. One idea for motivating students is the use of computer games. Different studies show the positive impacts of a game-based or gamified approach in the field of STEM education and training. Several theories and frameworks were researched and developed to support the game design and gamification process of various scenarios. However, only a few cover specific design issues and implications of educational and instructional simulations. In this chapter we introduce a gamification model, which is adapted accordingly to the characteristics of constructivist STEM education approaches with focus on the usage of science simulations. Therefore we will introduce a model for the adaption of gamification techniques to design, develop, and adapt educational simulations. Based on a background and literature study, a framework for implementing a gamification approach for different kinds of simulations is introduced and applied to an application scenario of our own research. As a result, both the lessons learned and further recommendations are outlined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, W. K., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2006). PhET look and feel. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://phet.colorado.edu/web-pages/publications/PhET.
Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., et al. (2008a). A study of educational simulations part I: Engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(3).
Adams, W. K., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., et al. (2008b). A study of educational simulations part II: Engagement and learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(4).
Aldrich, C. (2009). Learning online with games, simulations, and virtual worlds. San Francisco: Wiley.
Avedon, E. M., & Sutton-Smith, B. (1981). The study of games. New York: Wiley.
Becker, K., & Parker, J. R. (2011). The guide to computer simulations and games. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
Bell, R. L., & Smetana, L. K. (2008). Using computer simulations to enhance science teaching and learning. National Science Teachers Association, 3, 23–32.
Brathweite B. & Schreibe I. (2009) Challenges For Game Designers. Boston: MA. Charles River Media.
Christian, W., (2005). Davidson College WebPhysics server. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://webphysics.davidson.edu/Applets/Applets.html.
Cooper, S., Khatib, F., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Lee, J., Beenen, M., Leaver-Fay, A., Baker, D., Popovi´c, Z., & Foldit Players. (2010) Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game. Nature. 2010/08/05.
Cooper, S., Treuille, A., Barbero, J., Leaver-Fay, A., Tuite, K., Khatib, F., Snyder, A.C., Beenen, M., Salesin, D., Baker, D., Popovic, Z., & 57.000 Foldit players. (2010). The challenge of designing scientific discovery games. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG’10). ACM, New York, pp. 40-47.
Csikiszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: Experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deterding, S., Dixon, D. Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011) From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining “Gamification”. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (MindTrek’11). ACM, New York, pp. 9-15.
Dori, Y. J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate Students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.
Foldit Website. (2012). Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://fold.it
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Graham, S., & Weiner, B. (1972). Theories and principles of motivation. Oxford, UK: Markham.
Hake, R. (1988). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2010). Protein-folding game taps power of worldwide audience to solve difficult puzzles. Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-08/hhmi-pgt080310.php
Ibrahim, R., & Jaafar, A. (2009). Educational Games (EG) design framework: Combination of game design, pedagogy and content modeling. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informations. Selangor, Malaysia
Kawrykow, A., Roumanis, G., Kam, A., Kwak, D., Leung, C., Wu, C., et al. (2012). Phylo: A citizen science approach for improving multiple sequence alignment. PLoS One, 7(3), e31362. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031362.
Kelly, H., Howell, K., Glinert, E., Holding, L., Swain, C., Burrowbridge, A., et al. (2007). How to build serious games. Communications of the ACM-Creating a Science Of Game, 50(7).
Khatib, F., Dimaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., Popović, Z., Jaskolski, M., & Baker, D. Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. Retrieved September 2011, ISSN 1545-9985. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2119 DOI:10.1038%2Fnsmb.2119 . PMID 21926992.
Koster, R. (2004). A theory of fun for game design. Sebastopol, CA: Paraglyph Press.
Lunce, L. M. (2006). Simulations: Bringing the benefits of situated learning to the traditional classroom. Journal of Applied Educational Technology, 3, 37–45.
Laurel, B. (2008). Design research: Methods and perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Malone, T. W. & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Aptitude, learning, and instruction vol 3: Conative and affactive process analyses.
Martens, A., Diener, H., & Malo, S. (2008). Transactions on Edutainment LNCS, 5080, 176–190.
Mayo, M. J. (2007). Games for science and engineering education. Communications of the ACM-Creating a Science of Games, 50(7).
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. London: Penguin Press HC.
OSP. (2003). Retrieved September 1, 2012, from http://www.compadre.org/osp/.
PhET. (2011). Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://phet.colorado.edu.
PhET Simulation Design Process. (2013). Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://phet.colorado.edu/publications/phet_design_process.pdf
Pirker, J. (2013). Virtual TEAL World. Master Thesis, Graz University of Technology, Februrary 2013.
Randel, J. M., Morris, B. A., Wezuel, C. D., & Whitehill, B. V. (1992). The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research. Simulation & Gaming, 23(3).
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and New directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEMmania. The Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.
Schell, J. (2008). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Burlington, MA: Elsevier/Morgan Kaufmann.
Squire, K., Barnett, M., Grant, J. M., & Higginbotham, T. (2004). Electromagnetism Supercharged!: Learning physics with digital simulation games. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences.
TEALsim Website. (2004). Retrieved August 15, 2013, from http://web.mit.edu/viz/soft/visualizations/TEALsim/index.html
Teed, R. (2012). Game-Based Learning. (Science Education Resource Center Carleton College) Retrieved September 15, 2012, from http://serc.carleton.edu/introgeo/games
Thompson, C. (2011). How Khan Academy is changing the rules of education. Wired Magazine, 126.
Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Briere, N., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
Van Eck, R. (2006). Digitial game-based learning. It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. Educause Review, 41, 16–30.
Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: The roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145–160.
Wired. (2012), Wired: New videogame lets amateur researchers mess with RNA. Retrieved January 12, 2014, from http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/07/ff_rnagame/
Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the CECI at MIT for initiating this research. Special thanks to John W. Belcher and Phil H. Bailey for their valuable expertise in pedagogical simulation design. We would also like to acknowledge the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pirker, J., Gütl, C. (2015). Educational Gamified Science Simulations. In: Reiners, T., Wood, L. (eds) Gamification in Education and Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10207-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10208-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)