Advertisement

Investigating Knowledge and Opinion

  • John Corcoran
  • Idris Samawi Hamid
Part of the Studies in Universal Logic book series (SUL)

Abstract

This work treats correlative concepts of knowledge and opinion, in various senses. In all senses of ‘knowledge’ and ‘opinion’, a belief known to be true is knowledge; a belief not known to be true is opinion. In this sense of ‘belief’, a belief is a proposition thought to be true—perhaps, but not necessarily, known to be true. All knowledge is truth. Some but not all opinion is truth. Every proposition known to be true is believed to be true. Some but not every proposition believed to be true is known to be true. Our focus is thus on propositional belief (“belief-that”): the combination of propositional knowledge (“knowledge-that”) and propositional opinion (“opinion-that”). Each of a person’s beliefs, whether knowledge or opinion, is the end result of a particular thought process that continued during a particular time interval and ended at a particular time with a conclusive act—a judgment that something is the case. This work is mainly about beliefs in substantive informative propositions—not empty tautologies.

We also treat objectual knowledge (knowledge of objects in the broadest sense, or “knowledge-of”), operational knowledge (abilities and skills, “knowledge-how-to”, or “know-how”), and expert knowledge (expertise). Most points made in this work have been made by previous writers, but, to the best of our knowledge, they have never before been collected into a coherent work accessible to a wide audience.

Keywords

Belief Knowledge/opinion Propositional Operational Objectual Cognition 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03B42 03A05 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank those who have made important contributions to the dialogue leading up to this work. Robert Barnes, Leigh Duffy, John Glanville (1921–2010), Carol Gould, Forest Hansen, Peter Hare (1935–2008), Amanda Hicks, Daniel Merrill, Joaquin Miller, Hassan Masoud, Paul Moser, Mary Mulhern, Carlo Penco, Anthony Preus, José Miguel Sagüillo, Michael Scanlan, John Shook, Andrew Spear, Yevgeny Yarmolinets, Joseph Zeccardi, and John Zeis all deserve credit. Many thanks also to all who participated in the crafting of this article, especially David Brewer, Joseph Corcoran, David Hitchcock, Leonard Jacuzzo, Timothy Madigan, James McNabb, Kristo Miettinen, Frango Nabrasa, Sriram Nambiar, Daniel Novotny, Charles Pailthorp, Paul Penner, David Plache, and Roberto Torretti. David Hitchcock and Daniel Novotny deserve special thanks for alerting us to errors and obscurities in the penultimate draft; they are almost co-authors even though they disagree with some of our conclusions.

Many of the scholars mentioned disagree with some, many, or most of the conclusions of this work. We should also acknowledge many previous writers to whom we are indebted for most of the points made in this work. Our main contribution was to have collected their thoughts into a coherent work accessible to a wide audience. This paper is a substantial reworking of “An Essay on Knowledge and Belief” [15]. The word ‘essay’ in its title was carefully chosen: the essay has no footnotes or references and it is much shorter than this investigation. The essay was inspired by responses to early drafts of the encyclopedia article “Knowledge and Belief” [17].27

References

  1. 1.
    Anagnostopoulous, G. (ed.): Companion to Aristotle. Wiley-Blackwell, New York (2013) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aristotle: Metaphysics Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aristotle: Prior Analytics Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arnauld, A., Nicole, P.: Logic or the Art of Thinking: Port Royal Logic. Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1662/1996). Trans. J. Buroker. Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Audi, R. (ed.): Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 3rd edn. Cambridge UP, Cambridge (2015) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Austin, J.L.: Philosophical Papers. Oxford UP, Oxford (1961). Ed. J. Urmson and G. Warnock Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Austin, J.L.: Truth. Proc. Aristotelian Soc. Suppl. 24 (1950/1961). Reprinted Austin 1961 [6] Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Church, A.: Introduction to Mathematical Logic. Princeton UP, Princeton (1956) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Church, A.: Propositions and sentences. In: Bochenski, I., Church, A., Goodman, N. (eds.) The Problem of Universals. Notre Dame UP, Notre Dame (1956) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Corcoran, J.: Discourse grammars and the structure of mathematical reasoning I: mathematical reasoning and the stratification of language. J. Struct. Learn. 3(1), 55–74 (1971) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Corcoran, J.: Argumentations and logic. Argumentation 3, 17–43 (1989) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Corcoran, J.: Semantic arithmetic: a preface. Agora 14, 149–156 (1995) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corcoran, J.: Critical thinking and pedagogical license. Manuscrito XXII, 109–116 (1999) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Corcoran, J.: Counterexamples and proexamples. Bull. Symb. Log. 11, 460 (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Corcoran, J.: An essay on knowledge and belief. Int. J. Decis. Ethics II.2, 125–144 (2006) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Corcoran, J.: A priori/a posteriori. In: Lachs, J., Talisse, R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge, New York (2007) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Corcoran, J.: Knowledge and belief. In: Lachs, J., Talisse, R. (eds.) Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge, New York (2007) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corcoran, J.: Review of Nolt 2008. Math. Rev. (2008) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Corcoran, J.: Ambiguity: lexical and structural. Bull. Symb. Log. 15, 235–236 (2009) MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Corcoran, J.: Sentence, proposition, judgment, statement, and fact. In: Carnielli, W., et al. (eds.) The Many Sides of Logic, pp. 71–103. College Publications, London (2009) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Corcoran, J., Frank, W.: Cosmic justice hypotheses. Bull. Symb. Log. 20, 247 (2014) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Corcoran, J., Hamid, I.S.: Objectivity-subjectivity distinctions. Bull. Symb. Log. 20, 248 (2014) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davenport, H.: Higher Arithmetic. New York, Harper (1952/1960) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    De Morgan, A.: On the Syllogism and Other Logical Writings. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1966). Ed. P. Heath zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dessi, P.: Introduction. In: Whately, R.: Elements of Logic. Editrice CLLEB, Bologna (1826). Ed. P. Dessi (1988) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Frege, G.: Foundations of Arithmetic. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1884). Trs. J.L. Austin Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Frege, G.: The thought: a logical inquiry. Mind 65, 289–311 (1956). Trans. by A. and M. Quinton CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Frege, G.: The Frege Reader. Blackwell, Oxford (1997). Ed. M. Beaney zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Giorgi, A.: The question of validity in qualitative research. J. Phenomenol. Psychol. 33, 124–134 (2002) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Goldstein, R.N.: The pragmatist. New York Times Book Review, 17 December 2006 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hilpinen, R.: Knowing that one knows and the classical definition of knowledge. Synthese 21, 109–132 (1970) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lachs, J., Talisse, R. (eds.): Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge, New York (2007) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Merriam-Webster Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edn. Merriam-Webster, Springfield (2008) Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mill, J.S.: A System of Logic, 10th edn. 2 vols. Longmans Green, London (1843/1879) Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Moser, P.: Knowledge and Evidence. Cambridge UP, Cambridge (1991) Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nolt, J.: Truth as an epistemic ideal. J. Philos. Log. 37, 203–237 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Peirce, C.S.: The fixation of belief. Pagination refers to the reprinting in Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1867–1893), vol. I. Indiana UP, Bloomington (1992). Eds. N. Houser and C. Kloesel Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Peirce, C.S.: On the algebra of logic. Am. J. Math. 3, 15–57 (1880) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Peirce, C.S.: On the algebra of logic: a contribution to the philosophy of notation. Am. J. Math. 7, 180–202 (1885) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1867–1893), vol. I. Indiana UP, Bloomington (1992). Eds. N. Houser and C. Kloesel zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Peirce, C.S.: The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913), vol. II. Indiana UP, Bloomington (1998). Eds. N. Houser and C. Kloesel zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Peters, F.E.: Greek Philosophical Terms. New York UP, New York (1967) Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Preus, A.: Historical Dictionary of Ancient Greek Philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham (2007) Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Quine, W.V., Ullian, J.S.: The Web of Belief. Harvard UP, Cambridge (1978) Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Russell, B.: Intuition. Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (2015) Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tarski, A.: Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Hackett, Indianapolis (1983) Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Tarski, A.: What are logical notions? Hist. Philos. Logic 7, 143–154 (1986) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Whately, R.: Elements of Logic. Editrice CLLEB, Bologna (1826). Ed. P. Dessi, 1988 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PhilosophyUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.PhilosophyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations