Advertisement

Caramuel and the “Quantification of the Predicate”

  • Wolfgang Lenzen
Part of the Studies in Universal Logic book series (SUL)

Abstract

The theory of the “Quantification of the Predicate” attempts to transform the traditional logic of the four categorical forms (Every S is P; No S is P; Some S is P; Some S isn’t P) into a system of eight or even twelve propositions in which the simple predicate P is replaced by a quantified predicate like ‘some P’, ‘every P’ and perhaps even ‘no P’. According to the standard historiography of logic, such a theory was invented in the 19th century by W. Hamilton and Augustus De Morgan. However, already in the 17th century, the Spanish logician Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz published a book “Theologia rationalis” in which propositions with quantified predicates are systematically investigated. By way of a remarkable extension of the traditional theory of conversion, Caramuel arrives at a system of logical inferences which might be considered as a forerunner of Hamilton’s theory. However, Caramuel’s “method” basically consists only in listing various examples of true and false propositions. Therefore, his theory fails to provide a general semantics for propositions with a quantified predicate. One variant of such a semantics was developed in the 18th century by Gottfried Ploucquet. Another completely different one had been sketched already in the 17th century by Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.

Keywords

History of logic 17th century Categorical forms Quantification of the predicate Juan Caramuel y Lobkowitz Gottfried Ploucquet Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz 

Mathematics Subject Classification

03A05 03B65 03B99 

References

  1. 1.
    Arnauld, A., Nicole, P.: La Logique ou L’Art de Penser, 5th edn. (1683); reprint Paris (Presses universitaires de France), 1965 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bentham, G.: Outlines of a New System of Logic […]. Hunt & Clarke, London (1827) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bocheński, J.M.: Formale Logik. Alber, Freiburg (1956) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bök, A.F. (ed.): Sammlung der Schriften, welche den logischen Calcul Herrn Prof. Ploucquets betreffen, mit neuen Zusätzen, Frankfurt, Leipzig (1766); reprint Stuttgart, 1970 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Caramuel, J.: Theologia Rationalis. Schönwetter, Frankfurt (1654) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Couturat, L.: Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Paris (1903) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Morgan, A.: Formal Logic, or, the Calculus of Inference, Necessary and Probable. Taylor & Walton, London (1847) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dvořák, P.: Juan Caramuel Lobkowitz: Selected Aspects of Formal and Applied Logic. Oikumene, Prague (2006) (in Czech) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dvořák, P.: Relational logic of Juan Caramuel. In: Gabbay, D.M., Woods, J. (eds.) Medieval and Renaissance Logic. The Handbook of the History of Logic, vol. 2, pp. 645–665. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Franz, M. (ed.): Gottfried Ploucquet—Logik. Hildesheim, Zürich, New York (2006) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hamilton, W.: Lectures on Metaphysics and Logic. Edinburgh, London (1861), ed. by H.L. Mansel and J. Veitch; reprint Stuttgart, Bad Cannstadt, 1969 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kneale, W., Kneale, M.: In: The Development of Logic. Clarendon, Oxford (1962) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lenzen, W.: Der “logische Calcul Herrn Prof. Ploucquets” (1). Arch. Gesch. Philos. 90, 74–114 (2008) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lenzen, W.: Ploucquet’s ‘refutation’ of the traditional square of opposition. Log. Univers. 2, 43–58 (2008) MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lenzen, W., von Wulfen, H.: Der “logische Calcul Herrn Prof. Ploucquets” (2). In: Lenski, W., Neuser, W. (eds.) Logik als Grundlage von Wissenschaft, pp. 17–51. Winter, Heidelberg (2010) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lenzen, W.: The quantification of the predicate—Leibniz, Ploucquet and the (double) square of opposition. In: Nicolás, J.A. (ed.) Leibniz und die Entstehung der Modernität, pp. 179–191. Steiner, Stuttgart (2010) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Parkinson, G.H.R.: Leibniz—Logical Papers. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1966) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pastore, V.A.: Giovanni Caramuel di Lobkowitz e i primordi della teoria della quantificazione del predicato. Class. Neo-Lat. 1, 125–135 (1905) Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ploucquet, G.: Fundamenta Philosophiae Speculativae. Tübingen (1759); quoted according to the “Extracta e Fundamentis Philosophiae Speculativae” in Bök (1766), 3–14 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ploucquet, G.: Institutiones Philosophiae Theoreticae sive De arte cogitandi […]. Tübingen (1772) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ploucquet, G.: Expositiones Philosophiae Theoreticae. Stuttgart (1782) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Risse, W.: Die Logik der Neuzeit, vol. 1. Frommann, Stuttgart (1964) Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Solly, T.: A Syllabus of Logic […]. London (1839) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thom, P.: The Syllogism. Philosophia, München (1981) zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Velarde Lombraña, J.: Aportaciones de Caramuel a la logica. In: Actas: Comunicaciones Presentadas al IIo Congreso de Teoria y Metodologia de las Ciencias, Oviedo, pp. 273–277 (1984) Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Venn, J.: Symbolic Logic. Macmillan, London (1881) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations