Skip to main content

Managing LTL Properties in Event-B Refinement

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8739))

Abstract

Refinement in Event-B supports the development of systems via proof based step-wise refinement of events. This refinement approach ensures safety properties are preserved, but additional reasoning is required in order to establish liveness and fairness properties.In this paper we present results which allow a closer integration of two formal methods, Event-B and linear temporal logic. In particular we show how a class of temporal logic properties can carry through a refinement chain of machines. Refinement steps can include introduction of new events, event renaming and event splitting. We also identify a general liveness property that holds for the events of the initial system of a refinement chain. The approach will aid developers in enabling them to verify linear temporal logic properties at early stages of a development, knowing they will be preserved at later stages. We illustrate the results via a simple case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrial, J.-R.: Modeling in Event-B: System and Software Engineering. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abrial, J.-R., Butler, M.J., Hallerstede, S., Hoang, T.S., Mehta, F., Voisin, L.: Rodin: an open toolset for modelling and reasoning in Event-B. STTT 12(6), 447–466 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrial, J.-R., Mussat, L.: Introducing dynamic constraints in B. In: Bert, D. (ed.) B 1998. LNCS, vol. 1393, pp. 83–128. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barradas, H., Bert, D.: Specification and proof of liveness properties under fairness assumptions in B event systems. In: Butler, M., Petre, L., Sere, K. (eds.) IFM 2002. LNCS, vol. 2335, pp. 360–379. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Feige, U., Arenas, A.E., Aziz, B., Massonet, P., Ponsard, C.: Towards modelling obligations in event-B. In: Börger, E., Butler, M., Bowen, J.P., Boca, P. (eds.) ABZ 2008. LNCS, vol. 5238, pp. 181–194. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, M.J.: A CSP approach to Action Systems. DPhil thesis, Oxford U. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Derrick, J., Smith, G.: Temporal-logic property preservation under Z refinement. Formal Asp. Comput. 24(3), 393–416 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Groslambert, J.: Verification of LTL on B Event Systems. In: Julliand, J., Kouchnarenko, O. (eds.) B 2007. LNCS, vol. 4355, pp. 109–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hallerstede, S., Leuschel, M., Plagge, D.: Validation of formal models by refinement animation. Science of Computer Programming 78(3), 272–292 (2013)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoang, T.S., Abrial, J.-R.: Reasoning about liveness properties in Event-B. In: Qin, S., Qiu, Z. (eds.) ICFEM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6991, pp. 456–471. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Leuschel, M., Butler, M.J.: ProB: an automated analysis toolset for the B method. STTT 10(2), 185–203 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Leuschel, M., Falampin, J., Fritz, F., Plagge, D.: Automated property verification for large scale B models. In: Cavalcanti, A., Dams, D.R. (eds.) FM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5850, pp. 708–723. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Morgan, C.: Of wp and CSP. Beauty is our business: a birthday salute to E. W. Dijkstra, pp. 319–326 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plagge, D., Leuschel, M.: Seven at one stroke: LTL model checking for high-level specifications in B, Z, CSP, and more. STTT 12(1), 9–21 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schneider, S., Treharne, H., Wehrheim, H.: The behavioural semantics of Event-B refinement. Formal Asp. Comput. 26(2), 251–280 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Schneider, S., Treharne, H., Wehrheim, H., Williams, D.: Managing LTL properties in Event-B refinement. arXiv:1406:6622 (June 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Williams, D.M., de Ruiter, J., Fokkink, W.: Model checking under fairness in ProB and its application to fair exchange protocols. In: Roychoudhury, A., D’Souza, M. (eds.) ICTAC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7521, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schneider, S., Treharne, H., Wehrheim, H., Williams, D.M. (2014). Managing LTL Properties in Event-B Refinement. In: Albert, E., Sekerinski, E. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8739. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10181-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10181-1_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10180-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10181-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics