Abstract
Drawing both on the literature on political risks in international business studies and on further reaching theoretical approaches of political science, this paper provides an innovative model on corruption, favoritism and institutional ambiguity to better understand political risks in Ukraine. This model is then used to analyze the difficult business environment of Ukraine. Referring to this, the paper finally reveals coping strategies of international enterprises.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Book and Journal Articles
Agarwal J, Feils D (2007) Political risk and the internationalization of firms: an empirical study of Canadian-based export and FDI firms. Can J Adm Sci 24:165–181
Ampratwum EF (2008) The fight against corruption and its implications for development in developing and transition economies. J Money Laundering Control 11(1):76–87
Andersson S, Heywood PM (2009) The politics of perception: use and abuse of transparency international’s approach to measuring corruption. Polit Stud 57(4):746–767
Aslund A (2011) Will Yanukovych oust nation’s top oligarchs? Kyiv Post, 20 January. http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/will-yanukovych-oust-nations-top-oligarchs-95300.html. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Aslund A (2012) All power to “The Family” Kyiv Post, 27 March. http://www.kyivpost.com/opinion/op-ed/all-power-to-the-family-124996.html. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Bidder B (2012) Fall Timoschenko: Die dubiosen Geschäfte des Janukowitsch-Clans, der Spiegel. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ukraine-undurchsichtige-geschaefte-von-praesident-wiktor-janukowitsch-a-832317.html. Accessed 12 Mai 2013
Bratton M, Van de Walle N (1997) Democratic experiments in Africa: regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
BTI (2012) Ukraine Country Report. www.bti-project.de. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Business Anti-Corruption Portal: Ukraine Country Profile. http://www.business-anti-corruption.com/country-profiles/europe-central-asia/ukraine/snapshot. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Byrne E (2009) Definitions and types of corruption. A glossary. http://elaine.ie/2009/07/31/definitions-and-types-of-corruption. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Corruption Perception Index (2012). http://cpi.transparency.org/cpi2012/results. Accessed 9 Mai 2013
De la Torre J, Neckar D (1988) Forecasting political risks for international operations. Int J Forecasting 2(4):221–241
Dela Rama M (2012) Corporate governance and corruption: ethical dilemmas of Asian business groups. J Bus Ethics 109:501–519
Erdmann G (2012a) Neopatrimonialism: concept or metaphor? In: Heinrich A, Pleines H (eds) Challenges of the Caspian resource boom. Domestic elites and policy-making. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 46–57
Erdmann G (2012b) Neopatrimonialism: problems of a catch-all concept? In: Stewart S (ed) Presidents, oligarchs and bureaucrats. Forms of rule in the post-Soviet space. Ashgate, Burlingto, pp 43–62
Erdmann G, Engel U (2006) Neopatrimonialism revisited – beyond a catch-all concept. http://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/publikationen/working-papers. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
Fitzpatrick M (1983) The definition and assessment of political risk in international business: a review of the literature. Acad Manage Rev 2(8):249–254
Franke A et al (2009) Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as post-soviet rentier states: resource incomes and autocracy as a double “Curse” in post-soviet regimes. Europe-Asia Stud 61(1):109–140
Hellmann JS, Geraint J, Kaufmann D, Schankerman M (2000) Measuring, governance, corruption and state capture, Working paper no. 2312. Washington, DC, World Bank
Howell LD (2001) Defining and operationalizing political risk. In: Howell LD (ed) Political risk assessment: concept, method and management. PRS Group, East Syracuse
Howell LD, Chaddick B (1994) Models of political risk for foreign investment and trade. Columbia J World Bus 3(29):70–91
Kobrin S (1979) Political risk: a review and reconsideration. J Int Bus Stud 1(10):67–80
Kupatadze A (2011) Similar events, different outcomes: accounting for diverging corruption patterns in post-revolution Georgia and Ukraine, vol 26, Caucasus analytical digest. Center for Security Studies, ETH Zurich, pp 2–4
Laruelle M (2012) Discussing neopatrimonialism and patronal presidentialism in the Central Asian context. Demokratizatsiya J Post-Soviet Democratization 20(4):301–324
Matuszak S (2012) Demokracja Oligarchiczna. Wplyw grup biznesowych na ukrainska polityke, Prace OSW, 42. Osrodek Studiow Wschodnich, Warszawa
Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3):681–712
Mayring P (2000) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Deutscher Studienverlag, Weinheim
Meissner H (2010) The resource curse and rentier states in the Caspian region: a need for context analysis. In GIGA working paper series no. 133, http://www.giga-hamburg.de/dl/download.php?d=/content/publikationen/pdf/wp133_meissner.pdf. Accessed 8 Mai 2013
Meissner H (2013) Der “Ressourcenfluch” in Aserbaidschan und Turkmenistan und die Perspektiven von Effizienz- und Transparenzinitiativen. In Tetzlaff R, Jakobeit C (eds) Demokratie und Entwicklung, vol 66. LIT Verlag, Münster
Monti-Belkaoui J, Riha-Belkaoui A (1998) The nature, estimation, and management of political risk. Quorum Books, Westport
Nigh D (1985) The effect of political events on United States direct foreign investment: a pooled time-series cross-sectional analysis. J Int Bus Stud 1(16):1–17
O’Neil T (2007) Neopatrimonialism and public sector performance and reform. www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/4393.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
Robinson N (2013) Economic and political hybridity: patrimonial capitalism in the post-Soviet space. J Eurasian Stud 4(2013):136–145
Robock SH (1971) Political risk: identification and assessment. Columbia J World Bus 6:6–20
Rodriguez P, Uhlenbruck K, Eden L (2005) Government corruption and the entry strategies of multinationals. Acad Manage Rev 30(2):383–396
Rose-Ackermann S (1999) Political corruption and democracy. Conn J Int Law 14(2):363–378
Schneider-Deters W (2012) Die Ukraine: Machtvakuum zwischen Russland und der Europäischen Union. BWV Berliner-Wissenschafts-Verlag, Berlin
Schneider-Deters W (2013) Die Ukraine nach der Parlamentswahl 2012 – “Die Familie” übernimmt die Regierung. In Ukraine-Analysen Nr. 115, pp 2–7
Schöllhammerr H, Nigh D (1984) The effect of political events on foreign direct investments by German multinational corporations. Manage Int Rev 1(28):18–40
Shahabuddin S (2007) Corruption and its economic and business implications. Bus Rev 8(1):305–314
Sherr J (2010) The mortgaging of Ukraine’s independence. Briefing paper, Chattam House. http://www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Russia%20and%20Eurasia/bp0810_sherr.pdf. Accessed 9 Mai 2013
Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108:599–617
Simon JD (1982) Political risk assessment: past trends and future prospects. Columbia J World Bus 3(17):62–72
Soest C et al. (2011) How Neopatrimonialism affects tax administration: a comparative study of three world regions. http://www.giga-hamburg.de/de/publikationen/working-papers. Accessed 12 Dec 2013
Sööt M (2012) The role of management in tackling corruption. Baltic J Manage 7(3):287–301
Straub S (2008) Opportunism, corruption and the multinational firm’s mode of entry. J Int Econ 74:245–263
Teixeira AAC, Grande M (2012) Entry mode choices of multinational companies (MNCs) and host countries’ corruption. A review. African J Bus Manage 6(27):7942–7958
Toyne B, Walters P (1993) Global marketing management. Allyn and Bacon, Massachusetts
Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Pub Econ 76:399–457
Uhlenbruck K, Rodriguez P, Doh J, Eden L (2006) The impact of corruption on entry strategy: evidence from telecommunication projects in emerging markets. Organ Sci 17(3):402–413
van Wyk J (2010) Political sources of international business risk: an interdisciplinary framework. J Int Bus Res 9(1):103–119
Yemelianova A (2010) A diagnosis of corruption in Ukraine. Working papers, 14, European Research Centre for Anti-Corruption and State-Building. http://www.againstcorruption.eu/reports/ukraine. Accessed 9 Mai 2013
Zhao JH, Kim SH, Du J (2003) The impact of corruption and transparency on foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis. Manage Int Rev 1(43):41–62
Ziemer K et al (1998) Stichwort “Klientelismus”. In: Nohlen D (ed) Lexikon der Politik: Politische Begriffe. Büchergilde Gutenberg, Frankfurt am Main, p 304
Zimmerer G (2012) Raider attacks in Ukraine. Transparency International, Ukraine, p 9
Interviews
Interview 1, Kiev 25.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian real estate company
Interview 2, Kiev 20.02.2013, a representative of a Ukrainian foundation
Interview 3, Kiev 20.02.2013, a political journalist of a Ukrainian newspaper
Interview 4, 19.02.2013, expert on corruption of an international NGO
Interview 5, Kiev 25.02.2013 expert on corruption of a Ukrainian NGO
Interview 6, Kiev 26.02.2013, a economic journalist of Ukrainian newspaper
Interview 7, Kiev 19.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian production company
Interview 8, Bratislava 26.03.2013, a representative of German automobile company
Interview 9, Kiev 20.02.2013, a representative of a German trade company
Interview 10, Vienna 1.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian tax consultancy
Interview 11, Kiev 18.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian bank
Interview 12, Vienna 8.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian insurance company
Interview 13, Kiev 22.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian construction company
Interview 14, 25.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian bank
Interview 15, 26.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian insurance company
Interview 16, Kiev 23.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian steel construction company
Interview 17, Kiev 22.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian investment company
Interview 18, Kiev 27.02.2013, a representative of a German pharmaceutical company
Interview 19, Kiev 27.02.2013, a representative of a German construction technique company
Interview 20, Kiev 28.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian bank
Interview 21, Kiev 26.02.2013, a representative of a German production company
Interview 22, Kiev 18.02.2013, a representative of a German industrial engineering company
Interview 23, Kiev 25.02.2013, a representative of an Austrian transport company
Interview 24, Kiev 20.02.2013, a representative of a Ukrainian Institute
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leitner, J., Meissner, H., Martyna-David, E. (2015). The Debate About Political Risk: How Corruption, Favoritism and Institutional Ambiguity Shape Business Strategies in Ukraine. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Ongan, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10132-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10133-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)