Skip to main content

Could a 100% Portfolio Beat the Market?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1958 Accesses

Part of the book series: Sustainable Finance ((SUFI))

Abstract

In this article we shed light on the possibility to outperform the market via a 100% impact portfolio. For this, we have a closer look at the existing funds and indexes and analyze their performance over the last few years. We find no over- or underperformance of SRI portfolios. Nevertheless, evidence argues in favour of rather stable returns when compared to conventional products which may allow downside protection during recessions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/update/ retrieved on 10.05.2016.

References

  • Bauer, R. K., Koedijk, K., & Otten, R. (2005). International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1751–1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. D., Derwall, J., & Otten, R. (2007). The ethical mutual fund performance debate: New evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, C. R., Elton, E. J., & Gruber, M. J. (1993). The performance of bond mutual funds. Journal of Business, 66, 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brest, P., & Born, K. (2013). When can impact investing create real impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 11(4), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J. (1992). Survivorship bias in performance studies. Review of Financial Studies, 5(4), 553–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., & Vercelli, A. (2009). Global standards and ethical stock indexes: The case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx index. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 185–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2009). The performance of European socially responsible funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(4), 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Antonio, L., Johnsen, T., & Hutton, B. (2000). Socially responsible investing and asset allocation. The Journal of Investing, 9(3), 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwall, J., & Koedijk, K. (2009). Socially responsible fixed-income funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(1–2), 210–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBartolomeo, D. A., & Kurtz, L. (1999). Managing risk exposures of socially screened portfolios. Northfield Information Services, Boston. www.northinfo.com

  • Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., & Blake, C. R. (1995). Fundamental economic variables, expected returns, and bond fund performance. The Journal of Finance, 50(4), 1229–1256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition: Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez-Izquierdo, A., & Matallin-Saez, J. C. (2008). Performance of ethical mutual funds in Spain: Sacrifice or premium? Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garz, H. V., Volk, C., & Gilles, M. (2002). More gain than pain – SRI: Sustainability pays off. WestLB Panmure. http://www.westlbpanmure.com/sri/pdf/sri_nov2002.pdf

  • Goldreyer, E. F., Ahmed, P., & Diltz, J. D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: Incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A., & Whittaker, J. (2007). Performance and performance persistence of ‘ethical’ unit trusts in the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(7-8), 1327–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. M., Matatko, J., & Luther, R. (1997). Ethical unit trust financial performance: Small company effects and fund size effects. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24(5), 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, R. B., D’Antonio, L., & Johnsen, T. (1998). Socially responsible investing growing issues and new opportunities. Business & Society, 37(3), 281–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1968). The performance of mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. The Journal of Finance, 23(2), 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, R. F., & Chow, K. V. (2013). Orthogonalized factors and systematic risk decomposition. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 53(2), 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreander, N. G., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of Ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32(7–8), 1465–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Maux, J., & Le Saout, E. (2004). The performance of sustainability indexes. Finance India, 18, 737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leite, P., & Cortez, M. C. (2016). The performance of European socially responsible fixed-income funds (January 8, 2016). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2726094

  • Luther, R. G., Matatko, J., & Corner, D. C. (1992). The investment performance of UK “ethical” unit trusts. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 5(4), 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, C. S., Saadouni, B., & Briston, R. J. (1995). The financial performance of ethical investment funds. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22(4), 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 48, 180–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, D. A. (1997). The impact of social-responsibility screens on investment performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund. Review of Financial Economics, 6(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, B. (2005). Style and performance of Dutch socially responsible investment funds. The Journal of Investing, 14(1), 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: Investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, M. (2007). Is there a difference? The performance characteristics of SRI equity indices. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34(1-2), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W. F. (1994). The sharpe ratio. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 21(1), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds (corrected). Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Margarethe Rammerstorfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

This appendix describes the sample of SRI equity and fixed-income indices. For each index we indicate: provider, fund name, investment type, ticker, applied time horizon, legal domicile (GER Germany, ITA Italy, SUI Switzerland, BEL Belgium, GBR Great Britain, FRA France), investment region and the source of data.

Table 14 Description of SRI equity and fixed-income

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Immervoll, L., Rammerstorfer, M. (2018). Could a 100% Portfolio Beat the Market?. In: Wendt, K. (eds) Positive Impact Investing. Sustainable Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10118-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics