Skip to main content

Scales and Non-scales in (Hebrew) Child Language

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 729 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory ((SNLT,volume 91))

Abstract

This paper reports adult and child knowledge of the generalized scalar implicature (GCI) of disjunction, the non-scalar ‘Allover’ GCI and the particularized no-contrast implicature. The contributions of scales, generalization, and relational complexity to the developmental difficulty of phenomena at the semantic–pragmatic interface are discussed. Results show that children as old as 9 years do not demonstrate adultlike knowledge of the scalar GCI of disjunction or the no-contrast PCI, while the ‘Allover’ GCI is demonstrated at 5 years. We conclude that the quaternary level relational complexity of the later developing implicature and the ternary level complexity of the earlier developing implicature, as analyzed by Halford et al. (1998) Relational Complexity Metric, can account for this developmental pattern, and not scales or generality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Coordinated sentences are given a lower complexity in Halford et al. (1998) own analysis; however, we see the current analysis as more accurate and supported by behavioral results. Ternary level complexity is predicted to be acquired by 5 years, and this is the age at which children have been shown to demonstrate knowledge of the truth conditions of the coordinators (Paltiel-Gedalyovich 2003).

  2. 2.

    It has been suggested to us anonymously that the negation of the remaining colors has a greater ternary complexity. An alternative analysis would be that there is a double negation, not blue resulting in a binary relation having scope over a binary relation which yields a quaternary level relation. We would, however, argue that the first analysis is more accurate, but that the multiple negations are chunked, thus reducing their combined complexity.

  3. 3.

    This was part of a larger experiment into semantic and pragmatic knowledge of coordinators. Only the relevant conditions are reported here.

References

  • Berman, R.A. 2004. Between emergence and mastery: The long development route of language acquisition. In Language Development Across Childhood and Adolescence, ed R.A. Berman. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bott, L., and I.A. Noveck. 2004. Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language 51(3): 437–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, S., and R. Thornton. 1998. investigations in universal grammar: A guide to experiments in the acquisition of syntax and semantics. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G.S., W.H. Wilson, and S. Phillips. 1998. Processing capacity as defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(6): 803–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnish, R. 1991. Logical form and implicature. In Pragmatics ed S. David, pp. 316–364. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson, J. 1995. Creative Wonders Sesame Street ArtWorkshop. Henson Productions, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L.R. 1976. On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. Bloomington, Indiana.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, Ira A., and Florelle Chevaux. 2002. The pragmatic development of and. In BUCLD 26 Proceedings, ed. Badbara Skarabella, et al., 453–463. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltiel-Gedalyovich, L.R. 2003. Towards an explanation of first language acquisition of Hebrew coordination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltiel-Gedalyovich, L.R. 2008. Response uniformity distinguishes semantics from pragmatics: Evidence from Hebrew coordination and implications for interpreting child language data. Presented at Workshop on Experimental Pragmatics/Semantics, DGfS conference, Bamberg, 27–29 Feb 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, A., and J. Musolino. 2003. Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86: 253–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. 1999. The processing cost of reference-set computation: Guess patterns in acquisition. OTS Working Papers, Utrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, Y., and M. Rimon. 1994. Contrast and implication in natural language. Journal of Semantics 11: 365–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially based on Leah’s doctoral thesis (2003) completed under the supervision of Dr. Jeannette Schaeffer and Prof. Nomi Shir. This work was partially supported by grant no. 4-2004 from the National Institute for Psychobiology in Israel to Dr. Jeannette Schaeffer, and by a 2007 Summer Excellency Fellowship to Dr. Leah Paltiel-Gedalyovich from the Zlotowski Center for Neurosciences. Thanks to Professor Yishai Tobin who kindly presented an earlier version of this paper at CIL18 in Seoul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leah R. Paltiel-Gedalyovich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paltiel-Gedalyovich, L.R., Schaeffer, J. (2017). Scales and Non-scales in (Hebrew) Child Language. In: Lee, C., Kiefer, F., Krifka, M. (eds) Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 91. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10106-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10105-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10106-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics