Grounding a Sociable Robot’s Movements in Multimodal, Situational Engagements

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8417)

Abstract

To deal with the question of what a sociable robot is, we describe how an educational robot is encountered by children, teachers and designers in a preschool. We consider the importance of the robot’s body by focusing on how its movements are contingently embedded in interactional situations. We point out that the effects of agency that these movements generate are inseparable from their grounding in locally coordinated, multimodal actions and interactions.

References

  1. 1.
    Breazeal, C.: Designing Sociable Robots. MIT Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alač, M., Movellan, J., Tanaka, F.: When a robot is social: enacting a social robot through spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in robotics practice. Soc. Stud. Sci. 41(6), 126–159 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garfinkel, H.: Studies in Ethomethodology. Polity Press; Englewood Cliffs (1984[1967])Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jefferson, G.: Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In: Lerner, G.H. (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, pp. 13–31. John Benjamins, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G.: A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696–735 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Suchman, L.: Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd expanded edn. Cambridge University Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turkle, S.: Alone Together. Basic Books, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goodwin, C.: Professional vision. Am. Anthropol. 96(3), 606–633 (1994)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heath, C., Hindmarsh, J.: In: May, T. (ed.) Analyzing Interaction Video Ethnography and Situated Conduct. Qualitative Research in Action, pp. 99–121. Sage, London (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lynch, M.: Art and Artifact in Laboratory Science: A Study of Shop Work and Shop Talk in a Research Laboratory. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Movellan, J., Tanaka, F., Taylor, C., Ruvolo, P., Eckhardt, M.: The RUBI project: a progress report. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference of Human-Robot Interaction, Washington, D.C., 9–11 March 2007. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanaka, F., Cicourel, A., Movellan, J.: Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 104(46), 17954–17958 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., De La Rocha, O.: The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In: Rogoff, B., Lave, J. (eds.) Everyday Cognition. Harvard UP, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hindmarsh, J., Heath, C.: Embodied reference: a study of deixis in workplace interaction. J. Pragmat. 32, 1855–1878 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schegloff, E.A.: On some gestures relation to talk. In: Atkinson, J.M., Heritage, J. (eds.) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 266–296. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suwa, M., Kato, F.: Pattern language and storytelling: a methodology for describing embodied experience and encouraging others to learn. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Shikakeology, Stanford, March 2013Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Turkle, S.: The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. Simon and Schuster, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barthes, R.: Mythologies, pp. 88–90. Vintage, London (1957, 1972)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Robertson, J.: Gendering humanoid robots: robo-sexism in Japan. Body Soc. 16(2), 1–36 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Castaneda, C., Suchman, L.: Robot Visions. Social Studies of Science (2013)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nishizaka, A.: Hand touching hand: referential practice at a Japanese midwife house. Hum. Stud. 30(3), 199–217 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Goffman, E.: Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Northeastern UP, Boston (1974)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goffman, E.: Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. Pantheon Books, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kidwell, M., Zimmerman, D.: Joint attention in action. Pragmatics 39(3), 592–611 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tomasello, M.: Constructing a Language. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pollner, M., McDonald-Wikler, L.: The social construction of unreality: a case of a family’s attribution of competence to a severely retarded child. Fam. Process 24(1985), 241–254 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1953)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of California San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations