Skip to main content

The Stationary State: Deadlocks and New Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Essays in Contemporary Economics
  • 503 Accesses

Abstract

J. S. Mill, Marx and Keynes describe the stationary state, i.e. an economy without development, as the accomplishment of capital accumulation. In it abundance and peace will reign, in a society finally freed from the passion for money. The stationary state did appear in 1970s western countries in the form of saturation of markets for common goods and widespread welfare. However, instead of satisfaction, it made—together with the enormous increase in productivity—competition harder, capital redundant, and consequently growing unemployment and poverty. Profit-hunting should now cohabit with non-profit activities, promoted either by institutions or by private initiative.

I explained, orally and roughly, the ideas of this paper at the conference of the “Associazione di Storia dell’Economia politica” (Storep), held in Gaeta (Italy) in June 2013. I thank the participants in that debate and in the debate held in Volos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Cp. Schumpeter [1949], IV.7.3.a, 964–966.

  2. 2.

    See for ex. Mill (1848), III.5.6, 570–574.

  3. 3.

    Mill (1848, 2).

  4. 4.

    Marx (1864–1965), ch. 48, 3, 933.

  5. 5.

    See for ex. ibidem, ch. 51, 996–997.

  6. 6.

    Marx (1857–1858), notebook VII.2, Competition, vol. 2, 405.

  7. 7.

    Keynes (1930, 1).

  8. 8.

    According to Zilibotti (2008, 38) the increase in welfare has been even higher than Keynes’s prevision.

  9. 9.

    Cp. Leijonhufvud (2008).

  10. 10.

    Similar statements can be often found in the comments to Keynes’s article in Pecchi and Piga (2008), like those by Solow, Phelps, Freeman, etc.

  11. 11.

    Millar (1771), 180–188. Genovesi (1765) X.10, 231n; X.13, 234–235; and (1767) I.17.4. For other authors, see Perrotta (2004), ch. 11.6.

  12. 12.

    On full employment, see Pollin (2012).

  13. 13.

    Marx maintains that the unemployed, being ready to accept lower wages, push the wages of employed workers down. To this end, capital always keeps this reserve army: Marx (1867) ch. 23.3, 688–701.

  14. 14.

    O’Connor (1973).

  15. 15.

    Ricardo (1821) ch. 31.

  16. 16.

    On information technologies, see Gualerzi (2010).

  17. 17.

    See for ex. Reinert (2004) and Chang (2008).

  18. 18.

    Defoe (1728), 36–68.

  19. 19.

    The concept of disguised unemployment first appeared in development economics, in order to measure backwardness. For ex., if in agriculture 100 labourers without caterpillar produce the same quantity than 10 labourers who use a caterpillar, in the first case there is a disguised unemployment of 90 workers (less the cost of the caterpillar, measured in wages).

  20. 20.

    Baumann (2009) and Latouche (1995).

  21. 21.

    Stiglitz (2008).

  22. 22.

    Hirsch (1976).

  23. 23.

    Smith (1776), I, XI, part II, 165. Cp. Ricardo (1821), ch. 21, 195.

  24. 24.

    Krugman (2012).

  25. 25.

    Just two examples: Soros (2008) and Gallino (2011).

  26. 26.

    See, among the many data, those of the Economic Policy Institute (USA) cited by Fullbrook (2013): in the period 1979–2011 the average income of 90 % of US population (the less rich) rose from 27,000 to about 31,000 (+15 %); that of the richest 5 % (minus the top 1 %) rose from ca. 105,500 to 165,500 (+134 %); the average income of the richest 0.1 % of population rose from 570,000 to 2,000. 160 ca. (+279 %).

  27. 27.

    About the latter, see Smith (1776), b. I, ch. 6 and b. III, ch. 3. Marx (1867), ch. 24.7, 823–826; (1861–1863), vol. I, Appendice, 12.f, 606–609.

  28. 28.

    Marx realized such an evolution and put limits to the classical theory of labour value: M. (1957–1958), notebook VII.2, 403–406.

  29. 29.

    Of course an economy with a vast non-profit sector does not mean a centralized or socialist economy, as some authors believe (see for ex. Trainer 2011, 80).

  30. 30.

    Cp. Solow (2008), 92–93.

References

  • Baumann Z (2009) Capitalismo parassitario. Laterza, Roma-Bari, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang HJ (2008) Bad Samaritans. The myth of free trade and the secret history of capitalism. Bloomsbury, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Defoe, D (1728) Plan of the English Commerce, being a complete prospect of the Trade of this Nation, as well Home as Foreign, reprint. Kelley, New York, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullbrook E (2013) Score card: 16% vs. 288%. Real World Economics Review Blog, January 29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallino L (2011) Finanzcapitalismo. Einaudi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi A (1765) Lezioni di commercio ossia di Economia Civile, parte I. In: Custodi P (ed) Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica. Destefanis, Milano, pp 1803–1816, parte Moderna, 7 & 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovesi A (1767) Lezioni di commercio ossia di Economia Civile, parte II. In: Custodi P (ed) Scrittori classici italiani di economia politica. Destefanis, Milano, pp 1803–1816, parte Moderna, 8 & 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Gualerzi D (2010) The coming of age of information technologies and the path of transformational growth. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch F (1976) I limiti sociali allo sviluppo (social limits to growth). Bompiani, Milano, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1930) Economic possibilities for our grandchildren, on-line, scanned from Keynes, Essays in Persuasion. Norton, New York, pp 358–373, 1963

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (2012) End this depression now! Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Latouche S (1995) La megamacchina (La Megamachine). Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Leijonhufvud A (2008) Spalmando il pane sottile sul burro. In: Pecchi L, Piga G (eds) Il ventunesimo secolo di Keynes. LUISS U.P., Roma, 2011, pp 115–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1857–1858) Lineamenti fondamentali della critica dell’economia politica (Grundrisse). La Nuova Italia, Firenze, 1968, reprint 1978, 2 vols

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1861–1863) Teorie sul plusvalore. Editori Riuniti, Roma, 1961, reprint 1972, 2 vols

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1864–1865) Il Capitale, III. Editori Riuniti, Roma, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1867) Il Capitale, I. Editori Riuniti, Roma, 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1848) Principles of political economy, b. 4, ch. 6 (“Of the stationary state”), on line ed. 2000 Liberty Fund, http://www.econlib.org

  • Millar J (1771) The distinction of ranks in society. Murray, London, in-4

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor J (1973) La crisi fiscale dello stato (The fiscal crisis of the state). Einaudi, Torino, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  • Pecchi L, Piga G (eds) (2008) Il ventunesimo secolo di Keynes (Revisiting Keynes). LUISS U.P., Roma, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrotta C (2004) Consumption as an investment, The fear of goods from Hesiod to Adam Smith. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollin R (2012) Back to full employment. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert E (ed) (2004) Globalization, economic development and inequality. Elgar, Northampton, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo D (1821) Principles of political economy and taxation. Dent, London, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter JA (1949) History of economic analysis, 1954, reprint. Routledge, London, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) Ricchezza delle nazioni (Wealth of nations). ISEDI, Milano, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (2008) I nipoti di chi? In: Pecchi L, Piga G (eds) Il ventunesimo secolo di Keynes. LUISS U.P., Roma, 2011, pp 89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Soros G (2008) Cattiva finanza (The new paradigm for financial markets). Fazi, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz J (2008) Verso una teoria generale del consumismo. In: Pecchi L, Piga G (eds) Il ventunesimo secolo di Keynes. LUISS U.P., Roma, 2011, pp 49–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainer T (2011) The radical implications of a zero growth economy. Real World Econ Rev 57:71–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Zilibotti F (2008) ‘Possibilita’ economiche per i nostri nipoti’: una prospettiva globale 75 anni dopo. In: Pecchi L, Piga G (eds) Il ventunesimo secolo di Keynes. LUISS U.P., Roma, 2011, pp 37–48

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cosimo Perrotta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Perrotta, C. (2015). The Stationary State: Deadlocks and New Perspectives. In: Bitros, G., Kyriazis, N. (eds) Essays in Contemporary Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10043-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics