Advertisement

Abstract

The Bebras International Contest on Informatics and Computer Fluency has significantly grown in the number of participating countries and participants in recent years. Six years ago Dagienė and Futschek determined the criteria for good contest tasks, which are frequently used by the International Bebras Committee for selecting and improving tasks for national contest organizers. New experience and findings from several surveys allow us to reconsider these criteria from a new viewpoint and to assess which of these criteria are still actual, which need revisions and whether some new criteria are needed if the process of creation of informatics tasks for the contest is to be improved. The paper discusses the issues of motivation, interactivity, multiple-choice answers and content topics. The reviewed criteria and categories might be useful for authors of Bebras tasks as well as for creators of informatics curricula.

Keywords

teaching informatics computer science education informatics task informatics contest 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dagienė, V.: The Bebras Contest on Informatics and Computer Literacy – Students Drive to Science Education. In: Joint Open and Working IFIP Conference, ICT and Learning for the Net Generation, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 214–223 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dagienė, V., Futschek, G.: Knowledge construction in the Bebras problem solving contest. In: Kynigos, C., Clayson, J., Yiannoutsou, N. (eds.) Constructionism: Theory, Practice and Impact, pp. 678–680, The Educational Technology Lab, Univ. of Athens, Athens (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wollring, B.: Kennzeichnung von Lernumgebungen für den Mathematikunterricht in der Grundschule. In: Forschergruppe, K. (ed.) Lernumgebungen auf dem Prüfstand. Bericht 2 der Kasseler Forschergruppe Empirische Bildungsforschung Lehren – Lernen – Literacy, pp. 9–26. Kassel University Press GmbH, Kassel (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hejný, M.: Vyučování matematice na 1. stupni ZŠ orientované na budování schémat: Aritmetika. PedF UK, Praha (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vaníček, J.: Potenciální a skutečný dopad informatické soutěže do změn kurikula ICT v České republice. In: Kalaš, I. (ed.) DidInfo´2012, Univerzita Mateja Béla, Banská Bystrica, pp. 15–24 (2012) ISBN 978-80-557-0342-8Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dagienė, V., Futschek, G.: Bebras International Contest on Informatics and Computer Literacy: Criteria for Good Tasks. In: Mittermeir, R.T., Sysło, M.M. (eds.) ISSEP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5090, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barr, V., Stephenson, C.: Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads 2(1) (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sysło, M.M., Kwiatkowska, A.B.: Informatics for all high school students: a computational thinking approach. In: Diethelm, I., Mittermeir, R.T. (eds.) ISSEP 2013. LNCS, vol. 7780, pp. 43–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blaho, A., Salanci, L.: Informatics in Primary School: Principles and Experience. In: Kalaš, I., Mittermeir, R.T. (eds.) ISSEP 2011. LNCS, vol. 7013, pp. 129–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Computing. Programmes of study for Key Stages 1 - 4. National curriculum in England. Computing at School Working Group (2013), http://media.education.gov.uk/assets/files/pdf/c/computing%2004-02-13_001.pdf
  11. 11.
    Kalaš, I., Tomcsányiová, M.: Students’ Attitude to Programming in Modern Informatics. Informática na Educação: Teoria & Prática 12(1), 127–135 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schubert, S., Schwill, A.: Didaktik der Informatik, 2nd edn. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vaníček, J.: Searching for CS Tasks in ICT Curricula at Lower Secondary School Level. In: Reynolds, N., Webb, M., Syslo, M., Dagiene, V. (eds.) Learning While We are Connected, Proceedings of 10th IFIP WCCE, vol. 3, pp. 119–120, Toruń: Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vaníček, J.: Computer Science Tasks and Topics as a Part of ICT Curricula in the Eyes of Pupils and Teachers. Journal of Technology and Information Education 5(1), 67–74 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiří Vaníček
    • 1
  1. 1.University of South BohemiaČeské BudějoviceCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations