Advertisement

A 3D “T-shaped” Design Education Framework

Part of the Arts, Research, Innovation and Society book series (ARIS)

Abstract

The radically changing social and economic context of innovation calls for a shift in design education. This article argues that cultivating “T-shaped people,” characterized by the integration of both vertical and horizontal capabilities, should sit at the heart of design education that is geared toward innovation. Based on the prevailing Undergraduate-Master-PhD educational system, a 3D T-shaped educational framework is proposed. The curriculum planning practiced in the College of Design & Innovation (D&I) of Tongji University is adopted to illustrate several core considerations of this framework. These includes: breaking the rigid barriers between disciplines, developing new modes of design education by integrating and restructuring the knowledge arising from distinct areas and disciplines, and facing complex and diverse real world challenges. The authors attempt to use this framework as a hermeneutic tool to explore possible approaches to foster design innovation talents. This is further facilitated by relating individual 3D T-shaped models of distinct disciplines toward the idea of a Knowledge Cube.

Keywords

3D T-shaped Design education Vertical knowledge Horizontal knowledge Interdisciplinary 

References

  1. Brown T (2005) Strategy by design. Retrieved 28 Sept 2013, from Fast Company, website: http://www.fastcompany.com/52795/strategy-design
  2. Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dewey J ([1916]/2012) Democracy and education: an introduction to the philosophy of education. Indo-European Publishing. (Originally published: Macmillan, New York, 1916.)Google Scholar
  5. Friedman K (2012) Models of design: envisioning a future for design education. Visible Lang 46(1/2):128–151Google Scholar
  6. Hobday M, Boddington A, Grantham A (2011) An innovation perspective on design: part 1. Des Issues 27(4):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IfM and IBM (2008) Succeeding through service innovation: a service perspective for education, research, business and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge, UK. Retrieved 28 Sept 2013, from http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ssme/
  8. Leonard-Barton D (1995) Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Lou YQ, Valsecchi F, Diaz C (2013) Design harvests, an acupunctural design approach towards sustainability. Mistra Urban Futures, GothenburgGoogle Scholar
  10. Norman D (2010) Why design education must change. Retrieved 28 Sept 2013, from Core77, website: http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/why_design_education_must_change_17993.asp
  11. Shulman L (2004) The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  12. Sotamaa Y (2008) Kyoto design declaration 2008. In: Cumulus working papers, Kyoto, vol 20(8), pp 10–11Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Design and InnovationTongji UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Institute of Environment for Sustainable DevelopmentTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations