Advertisement

Crossing Thresholds: Artistic Practice in Times of Research

Chapter
Part of the Arts, Research, Innovation and Society book series (ARIS)

Abstract

This article will examine the role of the artist as a researcher in the context of a highly specialized and complex information and network society. Following structural changes in the relationship between art, research, and society at large, including higher education, and their impact on contemporary practitioners, it will establish art practice as a privileged spot to produce both unique knowledge and cultural agency. The metaphor of the threshold, interstice, or liminal space will serve as a descriptor for how the practice of an artist can be understood and used as a device for knowledge production. The article will be tied closely to my own artistic practice.

Keywords

Transformed learning landscape Arts-based research Art and knowledge-society Liminal spaces Interstices Threshold as a swing dis-positiv Collaborative silverware 

References

  1. Adamson N, Goddard L (2012) Introduction – Artists’ statements: origins, intentions, exegesis. Forum Mod Lang Stud 48(4):363–375. doi: 10.1093/fmls/cqs027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberro A, Stimson B (1999) Conceptual art: a critical anthology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  3. Balkema AW, Slager H (2004) Artistic research. Rodopi, Amsterdam/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Barone T, Eisner EW (2011) Arts based research. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker HS (1984) Art worlds. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker HS (1998) Tricks of the trade: how to think about your research while you’re doing it. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biggs M, Karlsson H (2011) The Routledge companion to research in the arts. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bly A (2010) Science is culture: conversations at the new intersection of science + society. Harper Perennial, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolter JD, Grusin R (1999) Remediation understanding new media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Cahn SM (ed) (2002) Philosophy for the 21st century: a comprehensive reader. Oxford University Press, New York/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  11. Cook SDN, Brown JS (1999) Bridging epistemologies: the generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organ Sci 10(4):381–400. doi: 10.1287/orsc.10.4.381 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daichendt GJ (2012) Artist scholar: reflections on writing and research. Intellect Ltd., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickie G (1969) Defining Art. Ame Philos Quart 6(3):253–256Google Scholar
  14. Frayling C (1993) Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, vol 1. Royal College of Ar. (n.d.), LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Freidson E (2001) Professionalism, the third logic: on the practice of knowledge. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Friedman K (2000) Creating design knowledge: from research into practice: Ken Friedman. Loughborough University, LeicestershireGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedman K (2003) Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Des Stud 24(6):507–522. doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(03)00039-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller S (2006) The philosophy of science and technology studies. Routledge, New York [etc.]Google Scholar
  19. Groys B (2008) Art Power. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Hickman RD (2008) Research in art & design education: issues and exemplars. Intellect, Bristol/ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  21. Holly MA, Smith M, Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute (eds) (2008) What is research in the visual arts?: obsession, archive, encounter. Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute/Distributed by Yale University Press, Williamstown/New HavenGoogle Scholar
  22. Jacob MJ, Grabner M (2010) The studio reader: on the space of artists. University of Chicago Press, Chicago/LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jagodzinski J, Wallin J (2013) Arts-based Research. A Critique and a Proposal. Sense Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  24. Jochum R (1998) Komplexitätsbewältigungsstrategien in der neueren Philosophie: Michel Serres. u.a.: Lang, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  25. Kandel ER (2012) The age of insight: the quest to understand the unconscious in art, mind, and brain: from Vienna 1900 to the present. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Koons J, Rosenblum R (1992) The Jeff Koons handbook. Rizzoli, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Liamputtong P, Rumbold J (2008) Knowing differently arts-based and collaborative research methods. Nova Science Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. McNiff S (1998) Art-based research. Kingsley, London [a.o]Google Scholar
  29. Meskimmon M (2011) Contemporary art and the cosmopolitan imagination. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Morin E (2008) On complexity. Hampton Press, CresskillGoogle Scholar
  31. Nelson R (2013) Practice as research in the arts: principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. Palgrave Macmillan, BasingstokeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. O’Donoghue D (2009) Are we asking the wrong questions in arts-based research? Stud Art Educ 50(4):352–368Google Scholar
  33. Plotnitsky A (2002) The knowable and the unknowable: modern science, nonclassical thought, and the “two cultures.”. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed D, Holler-Schuster G, Neue Galerie am Landesmuseum Joanneum (1996) New paintings for the mirror room and archive in a studio off the courtyard. Neue Galerie am Landesmuseum Joanneum, GrazGoogle Scholar
  35. Ritterman J, Bast G, Mittelstrass J (2011) Kunst und Forschung: können Künstler Forscher sein? = Art and research: can artists be researchers? SpringerWienNewYork, WienGoogle Scholar
  36. Rogers HS (2011) Amateur knowledge: public art and citizen science. Configurations 19(1):101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rolling JH (2012) A Paradigm Analysis of Arts-Based Research and Implications for Education. Stud Art Educ 51(2):102–114Google Scholar
  38. Rolling JH (2013) Arts-based research primer. Peter Lang Publishing, New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, WienGoogle Scholar
  39. Serres M, Harari JV, Bell DF (1983) Hermes: literature, science, philosophy. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  40. Snow CP (1993) The two cultures. Cambridge University Press, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Stenhouse L (1981) What counts as research? Br J Educ Stud 29(2):103–114. doi: 10.2307/3120018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sullivan G (2005) Art practice as research: inquiry in visual arts. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  43. Varto J (2009) Basics of artistic research: ontological, epistemological and historical justifications. University of Art and Design Helsinki, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations