Art, Research and Society: New Ecology: The Affective Power

Chapter
Part of the Arts, Research, Innovation and Society book series (ARIS)

Abstract

We are coming to a very interesting place in history where new ecology of art, scientific and technological innovation, and society, is emerging. It will fundamentally change the dynamics and thus evolving pathways of the development of our society, and demand corresponding changes of the ways we perceive, understand and interact with this emerging ecology. Reexamining the relationships of art, techno-scientific research and society is thus to help both artists, scientists, policy makers and the public understand the emerging ecological system to fully utilize the great opportunity and better cope with the new challenges.

Keywords

Double engines of society Emerging ecology Cross-fertilizing of arts and techno-scientific research 

References

  1. Adams R (2013) Anniversary – 80 years ago, Leo Szilard envisioned neutron chain reaction. ANS Nuclear Café, 17 Sept 2013Google Scholar
  2. Albert M (1995) Impact of an arts-integrated social studies curriculum on eighth graders thinking capacities. University of Kentucky, Lexington, pp xi, 344 leavesGoogle Scholar
  3. Angus J (1999) An enquiry concerning possible methods for evaluation arts for health projects. Community Health, BathGoogle Scholar
  4. Azmier J (2002) Culture and economic competitiveness: an emerging role for the arts in Canada. Canada West Foundation, CalgaryGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhshi H, Schneider P, Walker C (2008) Arts and humanities research and innovation. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts, LondonGoogle Scholar
  6. Baklien B (2000) Cultural is healthy. Int J Cult Policy 7(2):235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball S, Keating C (2002) Researching for arts and health’s Sake. In: 2nd conference on cultural policy research, Wellington, NZGoogle Scholar
  8. Barraket O (2005) Putting people in the picture? The role of the arts in social inclusion, social policy working paper no. 4. http://www.bsl.org.au/pdfs/barraket_arts_social_inclusion_1.pdf
  9. Bryan J (1998) The economic impact of the arts and cultural industries in Wales. Welsh Economy Research Unit, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  10. Bygren LO, Konlaan BB, Johansson S (1996) Attendance at cultural events, reading books or periodicals, and making music or singing in a choir as determinants for survival: Swedish interview survey of living conditions. Br Med J 313:1577–1580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carayannis EG, Wang V (2004) Innovation networks and clusters as tech transfer catalysts and accelerators. IAMOT2004 paperGoogle Scholar
  12. Carayannis EG, Wang V (2008) Innovation networks and knowledge clusters: findings and insights from the US, EU and Japan. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [u.a.], pp 1–20. ISBN 978-1-403-94245-6Google Scholar
  13. Chabris CF (1999) Prelude or requiem for the ‘Mozart effect’? Nature 400: 826–827 (26 August 1999).Google Scholar
  14. Combie AC (1986) Experimental science and the rational artist in early modern Europe. Daedalus 115(3):49–74Google Scholar
  15. Copley AA (1987) On knowledge in art and science. Leonardo 20:213–215Google Scholar
  16. Costello D (1998) The economic and social impact of the arts on urban and community development. In Dissertation abstracts international, A: the humanities and social sciences. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, pp 1333-AGoogle Scholar
  17. Cranefield P (1966) The philosophical and cultural interests of the biophysics move. Ede S (2005) Art and science. I.B. Tauris & Co LtdGoogle Scholar
  18. DeMoss K, Morris T (2011) How arts integration supports student learning: students shed light on the connections. http://www.capeweb.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/support.pdf
  19. Ede S (2005) Art and science. I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  20. Eskridge R (2003) (?) Exploration and the cosmos: the consilience of science and art. http://www.artic.edu/aic/education/sciarttech/2a1.html
  21. European Union (2011) Creative industries as a flywheel. Amsterdam Innovation Motor/Amsterdam Economic Board, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Fiske EB (1999) Champions of change: the impact of the arts on learning. Arts Education Partnership, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Florida RL (2002) The rise of the creative class: and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank A (2012) Where art and science meet, exactly. NPR. http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2012/02/07/146480823/where-art-and-science-meet-exactly
  25. Fuller RB (1939), as cited by Centre of Contemporary Art. Accessed September 2014 at http://csw.torun.pl/exhibitions/exhibitions-db/spaceship-earth, also at Open. NASA http://open.nasa.gov/blog/2012/05/08/science-art-and-human-spaceflight
  26. Garfield E (1989) Art and science. Part 1. The art-science connection. Current Comments Number 8:1–10Google Scholar
  27. Goss K (2000) Better together: the report of the Saguaro Seminar on Civic Engagement in America. Saguaro Seminar Civic Engagement in America John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University, Cambridge, MA. http://www.bettertogether.org/bt%5Freport.pdf
  28. Guetzkow J (2002) How the arts impact communities: an introduction to the literature on arts impact studies. In: Taking the measure of culture conference, Princeton University, Center for Art and Cultural Policy Study, Working paper series, 20Google Scholar
  29. Harrell DF, Harrell SV (2011) Strategies for arts + science + technology research: executive report on a joint meeting of the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Arts, NSF report, 18 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. Hetland L (2000) Listening to music enhances spatial-temporal reasoning: evidence for the “Mozart effect”. J Aesthet Educ 34:105–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Higgs PL, Cunningham SD, Bakhshi H (2008) Beyond the creative industries: mapping the creative economy in the United Kingdom. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson E (1979) The impact of arts enrichment instruction on self-concept, attendance, motivation, and academic performance. pp v, 135 leaves. Fordham University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Jeffrey K (1997) Many paths to the pacemaker. Am Herit Invent Technol 12(Spring):28–39Google Scholar
  34. Mackay J (1997) Sounds out of silence. A life of Alexander Graham Bell. Mainstream Publishing, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  35. Matarasso F (1997) Use or ornament? The social impact of participation in the arts. Comedia, StroudGoogle Scholar
  36. McCunn D (2013) The value of art to the local economy. http://bakercreekceramics.com/Art_and_Community.html
  37. Merli P (2002) Evaluating the social impact of participation in arts activities: a critical review of Francois Matarasso’s Use of ornament? Int J Cult Policy 8(1):107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. NASA (2012) Pictorial history of rockets, USGoogle Scholar
  39. OAM AB (1967) Why art matters. http://www.artinfluence.com/whyartmatters.html
  40. OECD (2013a) Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  41. OECD (2013b) Arts education in innovation-driven societies. http://oecdeducationtoday.blogspot.com/2013/06/arts-education-in-innovation-driven.html
  42. Perryman MR (2001) The arts, culture, and the texas economy: the catalyst for creativity and the incubator for progress. Baylor Bus Rev 19:8–9Google Scholar
  43. Remer J (1990) Changing schools through the arts: how to build on the power of an idea. ACA Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Root-Bernstein RS (1997a) The arts’ unsung role in supporting science. Educ Dig 63(4):p32Google Scholar
  45. Root-Bernstein RS (1997b) Hobbled arts limit our future. Los Angeles Times, 02 Sept 1997Google Scholar
  46. Root-Bernstein RS (1997c) For the sake of science, the arts deserve support. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 11, 1997, p B6. Cited from https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~sasselov/pic/bb.html
  47. Root-Bernstein RS (2003) The art of innovation: polymaths and universality of the creative process. In: International handbook on innovationGoogle Scholar
  48. Root-Bernstein RS, Root-Bernstein M (2003) Intuitive tools for innovative thinking. In: Shavinina LV (ed) International handbook on innovation. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 377–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Root-Bernstein M, Root-Bernstein RS (2008) Dance Your Experiment. Scientists and dancers find inspiration and insight in collaboration. Psychology Today, 13 Oct 2008Google Scholar
  50. Root-Bernstein R, Root-Bernstein M (2012) The importance of early and persistent arts and crafts education for future scientists and engineers. NSF SEAD whitepaperGoogle Scholar
  51. Shavinina LV (2003) The international handbook on innovation. Elsevier Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Singer M (2000) Culture works: cultural resources as economic development tools. Public Manage 82:11–16Google Scholar
  53. Smith CS (1978) Structural hierarchy in science, art and history. In: Wechsler J (ed) On aesthetics in science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 9–53Google Scholar
  54. Smith CS (1980) From art to science: seventy-two objects illustrating the nature of discovery. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  55. Stanziola J (1999) Arts, government and community revitalization. Ashgate, Aldershot/Brookfield/SydneyGoogle Scholar
  56. Staricoff RS (2004) Arts in health: a review of the medical literature. Arts Council England, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Stuckey HL, Nobel J (2010) The connection between art, healing, and public health: a review of current literature. Am J Public Health 100(2):254–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thoits PA, Hewitt LN (2001) Volunteer work and well-being. J Health Soc Behav 42:115–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner F, Senior P (2000) A powerful force for good: culture, health and the arts- an anthology. Manchester Metropolitan University, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  60. Walesh K, Henton D (2001) The creative community–leveraging creativity and cultural participation for silicon valley’s economic and civic future. Collaborative Economics, San JoseGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang V, Carayannis EG (2011) Promoting balanced competitiveness strategies of firms in developing countries (innovation, technology, and knowledge). Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Weitz J (1996) Coming up taller: arts and humanities programs for children and youth at risk. President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  63. Wells HG (1914) The world set free. E.P. Dutton & Company, New York. First published 1914. Access at https://archive.org/details/worldsetfreestor00well
  64. White TR, Rentschler R (2005, July) Toward a new understanding of the social impact of the arts. In: Proceedings from the 8th international conference on arts and cultural management, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  65. Whitman K (2013) Investing in arts education to advance California’s creative industry. http://www.artsed411.org/files/KurtWhitman_InvestinginArtsEducation%20copy.pdf
  66. Williams D (1995) Creating social capital: a study of the long-term benefits from community based arts funding. Community Arts Network of South Australia, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson S (2002) Information arts: intersections of art, science, and technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson S (2010) Art + science now. Thames & Hudson, LondonGoogle Scholar
  69. Winner E, Hetland L (Eds.) (2000) The arts and academic achievement: what the evidence shows. J Aesthet Educ 34 (3–4): 3–307Google Scholar
  70. Winner E, Goldstein TR, Vincent-Lancrin S (2013) Art for art’s sake? The impact of arts education, Educational research and innovation. OECD Publishing, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Executive OfficeUnited Nations Development Programme (UNDP)New YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations