Skip to main content

Homoclinic Ω-Explosion: Hyperbolicity Intervals and Their Bifurcation Boundaries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1051 Accesses

Part of the book series: Nonlinear Systems and Complexity ((NSCH,volume 12))

Abstract

It has been established by Gavrilov and Shilnikov (Math USSR Sb 17:467–485, 1972) that at the bifurcation boundary, separating Morse–Smale systems from systems with complicated dynamics, there are systems with homoclinic tangencies. Moreover, when crossing this boundary, infinitely many periodic orbits appear immediately, just by “explosion.” Newhouse and Palis (Asterisque 31:44–140, 1976) have shown that in this case, there are infinitely many intervals of values of the splitting parameter corresponding to hyperbolic systems. In the present chapter, we show that such hyperbolicity intervals have natural bifurcation boundaries, so that the phenomenon of homoclinic Ω-explosion gains, in a sense, complete description in the case of 2D diffeomorphisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Evidently, the case \(\sigma> 1\) is reduced to the case under consideration for f -1. Thus, only the case \(\sigma = 1\) is not in our competence; however, it is very specific and requires a special consideration (see, for example, [15, 16]).

  2. 2.

    Moreover, they possess Ω-moduli, i.e., continuous invariants of topological conjugacy on the set of nonwandering orbits. It means that any change of value of an Ω-modulus leads to a bifurcation of an orbit (periodic, homoclinic, etc) from the set N(f). As it was established in [19], the Gavrilov–Shilnikov invariant, \(\theta = - \ln|\lambda|/\ln|\gamma|\) introduced in [5], is the principal Ω-modulus here.

  3. 3.

    The existence of such coordinates was proved in [17]. Note that analogous \(C^{r-1}\)-coordinates was found in [19]. The form (1) of a saddle map is called the main normal form or normal form of the first order: such a form exists for any multidimensional saddle map, [17].

  4. 4.

    The number \(\bar k\) is chosen, in principle, depending on sizes of \(\Pi^+\) and Πi and it equals the minimal index “i” of the strips \(\sigma^{0}_{i}\) and \(\sigma^{1}_{i}\) from these neighborhoods. That is, the strips with index \(\bar k\) are “border”: they form the boundary, the so-called “special neighborhood” from U, [8,24] (so that, for example, \(\Pi^+\) does not contain points which reach Π for a number of iterations (by T 0) less than \(\bar k\)), see Fig. 4.

  5. 5.

    Note that the minimal number \(k(\mu)\) of the strips is chosen here to be depending on μ (in particular, \(k(\mu)\to +\infty\) as \(\mu\to 0\)). It follows from the fact that if \(i<k(\mu)\), then the condition \(T_{1\mu}\sigma^{1}_{i}\cap\sigma^{0}_{j}\neq\emptyset\) means that j > i. Therefore, \(N(f_\mu)\) does not contain those orbits which intersect the strips \(\sigma^{0,1}_{i}\) with numbers \(i<k(\mu)\); it means that all such strips can be “eliminated from” the initial neighborhoods \(\Pi^+\) and Π and, thus, one can consider smaller neighborhoods of \(O\cup\Gamma\), the so-called “special neighbourhoods,” see [14] for more detail.

  6. 6.

    It can easily be seen from Fig. 7d that if a planar diffeomorphism has a homoclinic tangency with \(c<0\), then other homoclinic orbits necessarily exist. Therefore, here takes place the so-called local Ω-explosion, i.e., the sharp change in the structure of nonwandering orbits from some subdomain of the phase space. Although this case can be described in the same way as the global Ω-explosion, it is not so interesting and, therefore, we do not consider it especially.

  7. 7.

    Here we assume that c is positive only for the sake of definiteness: it can be always realized for the appropriate choosing of a pair of homoclinic points. Indeed, take a pair of points \(M^{+\prime} = T_0(M^+)\) and \(M^-(0,y^-)\) instead \(M^+(x^+,0)\) and \(M^-(0,y^-)\). Then it is easy to check that \(x^{+\prime}= -\lambda x^+, b^\prime = b\lambda, c^\prime = c\gamma\) for the new global map \(T_1^\prime = T_0T_1:\Pi^-\to T_0(\Pi^+)\). Making the coordinate change \(x\mapsto-x, y\mapsto y\), we obtain that \(x^{+\prime}= |\lambda| x^+, b^\prime = -b\lambda, c^\prime = -c\gamma\), that is, the “new c” will have the opposite sign than the “old” one (making the change \(x\mapsto-x\), we arrive to our agreement that the coordinates \(x^+\) and y - of choosing homoclinic points must be positive).

  8. 8.

    An analog is the well-known “last bifurcation” in the Hénon family after which the nonwandering set becomes hyperbolic.

References

  1. Shilnikov, L.P.: On a new type of bifurcations in multidimensional dynamical systems. Sov. Math. Dokl. 182(1), 53–56 (1969)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Afraimovich, V.S., Shilnikov, L.P.: On accesible transitions from Morse–Smale systems to systems with many periodic motions. Russ. Acad. Sci. Izv. Math. 38(6), 1248–1288 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shilnikov L.P.: On birth of periodic orbits from an orbit bi-asymptotic to a saddle–saddle equilibrium. Sov. Math. Dokl. 170(1), 49–52 (1966)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Palis, J.: A note on Ω-stability. Global Analysis. Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, vol. 14, pp. 221–222. American Mathematical Society, Providence (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gavrilov N.K., Shilnikov, L.P.: On three-dimensional dynamical systems close to systems with a structurally unstable homoclinic curve. Part 1, Math. USSR Sb. 17, 467–485 (1972); Part 2, Math. USSR Sb. 19, 139–156 (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gavrilov, N.K.: On three-dimensional dynamical systems having a structurally unstable homoclinic contour. Sov. Math. Notes 14(5), 687–696 (1973)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gonchenko, S.V.: Moduli of Ω-conjugacy of two-dimensional diffeomorphisms with a nontransversal heteroclinic cycle. Russ. Math. Sb. 187(9), 3–24 (1996)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P., Turaev, D.V.: On Newhouse regions of two-dimensional diffeomorphisms close to a diffeomorphism with a nontransversal heteroclinic cycle. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 216, 70–118 (1997)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Newhouse, S., Palis, J.: Cycles and bifurcation theory. Asterisque 31, 44–140 (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Palis, J., Takens, F.: Cycles and measure of bifurcation sets for two dimensional diffeomorphisms. Invent. Math. 82, 397–422 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Palis, J., Takens, F.: Hyperbolicity and the creation of homoclinic orbit. Ann. Math. 125, 337–374 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Palis, J., Takens, F.: Hyperbolicity and the Creation of Homoclinic Orbit. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 35. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alligood, K., Sander, E., Yorke, J.: Explosions: Global bifurcations at heteroclinic tangencies. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 22, 953–972 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Stenkin, O.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: Homoclinic Ω-explosion and hyperbolicity domains. Russ. Math. Sb. 189(4), 125–144 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: Arithmetic properties of topological invariants of systems with a structurally unstable homoclinic trajectory. Ukr. Math. J. 39, 21–28 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonchenko, S.V., Gonchenko, V.S.: On bifurcations of birth of closed invariant curves in the case of two-dimensional diffeomorphisms with homoclinic tangencies. Proc. Math. Steklov Inst. 244, 80–105 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P., Turaev, D.V.: On dynamical properties of multidimensional diffeomorphisms from Newhouse regions. I. Nonlinearity 21, 923–972 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: Homoclinic tangencies. Thematic issue: Moscow-Izhevsk 524 p. (in Russian) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: Invariants of Ω-conjugacy of diffeomorphisms with a nontransversal homoclinic orbit. Ukr. Math. J. 42(2), 134–140 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonchenko, S.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: On moduli of systems with a nontransversal Poincaré homoclinic orbit. Russ. Acad. Sci. Izv. Math. 41(3), 417–445 (1993)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Gonchenko, S.V., Sten’kin, O.V., Turaev, D.V.: Complexity of homoclinic bifurcations and Ω-moduli. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 6(6), 969–989 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Shilnikov, L.P.: On a Poincaré-Birkhoff problem. Math. USSR Sb. 3, 91–102 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shilnikov, L.P., Shilnikov, A.L., Turaev, D.V., Chua, L.O.: Methods of qualitative theory in nonlinear dynamics. World Scientific, Singapore, Part I (1998), Part II (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gonchenko, S.V.: Nontrivial hyperbolic subsets of multidimensional systems with a nontransversal homoclinic curve. In: Methods of Qualitative Theory of Differential Equations, pp. 89–102. Gorky State University, Yekaterinberg (in Russian) (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grines, V.Z.: On topological conjugacy of diffeomorphisms of a two-manifold on one-dimensional basic sets. Part I, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 32, 35–60 (1975); Part II, Trudy Moskov. Mat. Obšč. 34, 243–252 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Enrich, H.: A heteroclinic bifurcation of Anosov diffeomorphisms. Ergod. Theory Dyn. Syst. 18, 567–608 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Hoensch, U.A.: Some hyperbolic results for Henon-like diffeomorphisms. Nonlinearity 21, 587–611 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Gonchenko, S.V., Turaev, D.V., Shilnikov, L.P.: Homoclinic tangencies of any order in Newhouse regions. J. Math. Sci. 105, 1738–1778 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank D. Turaev for fruitful discussions. This research was carried out within the framework of the Russian Federation Government grant, contract No.11.G34.31.0039. The paper was supported also in part by grants of RFBR No.10-01-00429, No.11-01-00001, and No.11-01-97017-povoljie.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergey Gonchenko .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gonchenko, S., Stenkin, O. (2015). Homoclinic Ω-Explosion: Hyperbolicity Intervals and Their Bifurcation Boundaries. In: González-Aguilar, H., Ugalde, E. (eds) Nonlinear Dynamics New Directions. Nonlinear Systems and Complexity, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09864-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09864-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09863-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09864-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics