Advertisement

Empirical Legitimacy as Two Connected Psychological States

  • Jonathan Jackson
  • Mike Hough
  • Ben Bradford
  • Jouni Kuha

Abstract

In this chapter we consider the idea that legitimacy judgments involve two connected beliefs. The first relates to consent and authorization: do people believe that an authority has the right to dictate appropriate behavior? The second relates to moral validity: do people believe that an authority exercises its power in ways that accord with prevailing norms of appropriate conduct? Marshalling data from Round 5 of the European Social Survey, we first assess the scaling properties of measures of police legitimacy using data from the UK. We then examine the utility of three different ways of representing legitimacy within in a larger model of public cooperation with the police.

Keywords

Police Officer Procedural Justice Procedural Fairness Legal Authority Criminal Court 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Blader, S., & Tyler, T. R. (2009). Testing and expanding the group engagement model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110(2), 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(1), 119–170.Google Scholar
  4. Bottoms, A. E., & Tankebe, J. (2013). Voice Within: Power-holders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 60–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford, B. (2014). Policing and social identity: Procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society, 24(1), 22–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradford, B., Huq, A., Jackson, J., & Roberts, B. (2014). What price fairness when security is at stake? Police legitimacy in South Africa. Regulation and Governance, 8(2), 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradford, B., Murphy, K., & Jackson, J. (2014). Officers as mirrors: Policing, procedural justice and the (re)production of social identity. British Journal of Criminology, 54(4), 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coicaud, J.-M. (2013). Crime, justice and legitimacy: A brief theoretical inquiry. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 37–59). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crawford, A., & Hucklesby, A. (Eds.). (2012). Legitimacy and compliance in criminal justice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. De Cremer, D., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Am I respected or not? Inclusion and reputation as issues in group membership. Social Justice Research, 18(2), 121–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dirikx, A., & Van den Bulck, J. (2014). Media use and the process-based model for police cooperation: An integrative approach toward explaining adolescents’ intentions to cooperate with the police. British Journal of Criminology, 54(2), 344–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elliott, I., Thomas, S. D. M., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011). Procedural justice in contacts with the police: Testing a relational model of authority in a mixed methods study. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(4), 592–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Social Survey. (2011). Trust in justice: Topline findings from the European Social Survey. Retrieved from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS5_toplines_issue_1_trust_in_justice.pdf.
  14. European Social Survey. (2012). Policing by consent: Understanding the dynamics of police power and legitimacy. Retrieved from http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS5_gb_toplines_policing_by_consent.pdf.
  15. Factor, R., Mahalel, D., Rafaeli, A., & Williams, D. R. (2013). A social resistance perspective for delinquent behavior among non-dominant minority groups. British Journal of Criminology, 53(5), 784–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farrall, S., Jackson, J., & Gray, E. (2009). Social order and the fear of crime in contemporary times. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gau, J. (2011). The convergent and discriminant validity of procedural justice and police legitimacy: An empirical test of core theoretical propositions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(6), 489–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner city young men’s perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gray, E., Jackson, J., & Farrall, S. (2011). Feelings and functions in the fear of crime: Applying a new approach to victimisation insecurity. British Journal of Criminology, 51(1), 75–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hasisi, B., & Weisburd, D. (2011). Going beyond ascribed identities: The importance of procedural justice in airport security screening in Israel. Law and Society Review, 45(4), 867–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., & Kaufman, D. (2003). Seize the state, seize the day: State capture, and influence in transition economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 31(4), 751–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hough, M., Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Myhill, A., & Quinton, P. (2010). Procedural justice, trust and institutional legitimacy. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 4(3), 203–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013a). The drivers of police legitimacy: Some European research. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 8(2), 144–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013b). The governance of criminal justice, legitimacy and trust. In S. Body-Gendrot, R. Lévy, M. Hough, S. Snacken, & K. Kerezsi (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of European criminology (pp. 243–265). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013c). Legitimacy, trust and compliance: An empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 326–352). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hough, M., & Sato, M. (2011). Trust in justice: Why it is important for criminal policy, and how it can be measured: Project report, Euro-Justis Project. Helsinki. Retrieved from http://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/4507/
  27. Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2011a). How do the purposes and targets of policing influence the basis of public cooperation with law enforcement? Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 17(3), 419–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huq, A. Z., Tyler, T. R., & Schulhofer, S. J. (2011b). Mechanisms for eliciting cooperation in counterterrorism policing: A study of British Muslims. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8(4), 728–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology, 60(3), 493–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Kuha, J., Stares, S. R., Widdop, S., et al. (2011). Developing European indicators of trust in justice. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, E. A., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Jackson, J., Huq, A., Bradford, B., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Monopolizing force? Police legitimacy and public attitudes towards the acceptability of violence. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19(4), 479–497. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jackson, J., & Kuha, J. (2014). Worry about crime in a cross-national context: A model-supported method of measurement Using the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 8(2), 109–126.Google Scholar
  35. Jackson, J., Kuha, J., Hough, M., Bradford, B., Hohl, K., & Gerber, M. M. (2013). Trust and legitimacy across Europe: A FIDUCIA report on comparative public attitudes towards legal authority. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2272975.
  36. Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Harpaz, A. (2014). Police understanding of the foundations of their legitimacy in the eyes of the public: The case of commanding officers in the Israel National Police. British Journal of Criminology, 54(3), 469–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50(1), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kane, R. J. (2005). Compromised police legitimacy as a predictor of violent crime in structurally disadvantaged communities. Criminology, 43(2), 469–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Karstedt, S., & Farrall, S. (2006). The moral economy of everyday crime: Markets, consumers and citizens. British Journal of Criminology, 46(6), 1011–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kirk, D. S., & Matsuda, M. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy, and the ecology of arrest. Criminology, 49(2), 443–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kochel, T., Parks, R., & Mastrofski, S. (2013). Examining police effectiveness as a precursor to legitimacy and cooperation with police. Justice Quarterly, 30(5), 895–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lind, E., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loader, I., & Mulcahy, A. (2003). Policing and the condition of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maguire, E. R., & Johnson, D. (2010). Measuring public perceptions of the police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 33(4), 703–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mazerolle, L., Bennett, S., Antrobus, E., & Tyler, T. R. (2013). Shaping citizen perceptions of police legitimacy: A randomized field trial of procedural justice. Criminology, 51(1), 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mulford, M., Jackson, J., & Svedsater, H. (2008). Encouraging cooperation: Revisiting group identity and cooperative norm effects in prisoners’ dilemma games. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(12), 2964–2989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding cooperation with police in a diverse society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, K., Tyler, T. R., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing regulatory compliance: Is procedural justice effective when people question the legitimacy of the law? Regulation and Governance, 3(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102(2), 397–439.Google Scholar
  51. Reiner, R. (2010). The politics of the police (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reisig, M. D., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. G. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 34(8), 1005–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sargeant, E., Murphy, T., & Cherney, A. (2014). Ethnicity, trust and cooperation with police: Testing the dominance of the process-based model. European Journal of Criminology, 11(4), 500–524.Google Scholar
  54. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.Google Scholar
  55. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In S. Worchel & L. W. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 276–293). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  57. Tankebe, J. (2009). Public cooperation with the police in Ghana: Does procedural fairness matter? Criminology, 47(4), 1265–1293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1), 103–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tankebe, J., & Liebling, A. (Eds.). (2013). Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Turner, V. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9(2), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tyler, T. R. (1997). The psychology of legitimacy. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(4), 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431–505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tyler, T. R. (2006a). Legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tyler, T. R. (2006b). Why people obey the law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Tyler, T. R. (Ed.). (2007). Legitimacy and criminal justice: International perspectives. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  67. Tyler, T. R. (2011a). Trust and legitimacy: Policing in the US and Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tyler, T. R. (2011b). Why people cooperate: The role of social motivations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2003). The group engagement model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7(4), 349–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell-Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  71. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2013). Future challenges in the study of legitimacy and criminal justice. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tyler, T. R., & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation and engagement. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20(1), 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992). A relational model of authority in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 115–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S. J., & Huq, A. Z. (2010). Legitimacy and deterrence effects in counter-terrorism policing: A study of Muslim Americans. Law and Society Review, 44(2), 365–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Waddington, P. (1999). Policing citizens: Authority and rights. London: University College Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan Jackson
    • 1
  • Mike Hough
    • 2
  • Ben Bradford
    • 3
  • Jouni Kuha
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MethodologyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute for Criminal Policy ResearchBirkbeck, University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.Centre for CriminologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations