Abstract
This chapter describes the current state of the art in altmetrics research and practice. Altmetrics—evaluation methods of scholarly activities that serve as alternatives to citation-based metrics—are a relatively new but quickly growing area of research. For example, researchers are expecting that altmetrics that are based on social media data will reflect a broader public’s perception of science and will provide timely reactions to new scientific findings. This chapter explains how altmetrics have emerged and how they are related to the academic use of social media. It also provides an overview of current altmetric tools and potential data sources for computing alternative metrics, such as blogs, Twitter, social bookmarking services, and Wikipedia.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to the Alexa.com ranking as of June 2014, the most accessed Web sites include Facebook, YouTube, Wikipedia, Twitter, and LinkedIn.
References
Adie E, Roe W (2013) Altmetric: enriching scholarly content with article-level discussion and metrics. Learn Publish 26(1):11–17
Allen HG, Stanton TR, Di Pietro F, Moseley GL, Sampson M (2013) Social media release increases dissemination of original articles in the clinical pain sciences. PLoS ONE 8(7):e68914
Altmetrics.com (no date) What does Altmetric do? http://www.altmetric.com/whatwedo.php#score. Accessed 14 June 2014
Bar-Ilan J (2012) JASIST 2001-2010. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 38(6):24–28
Bar-Ilan J, Haustein S, Peters I, Priem J, Shema H, Terliesner J (2012) Beyond citations. Scholars, visibility on the social Web. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators (STI conference), Montreal, pp 98–109
Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) (2014) Opening science: the evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, Heidelberg; New York
Baynes G (2012) Scientometrics, bibliometrics, altmetrics: some introductory advice for the lost and bemused. Insights 25(3):311–315
Bruns A (2008) Blogs, Wikipedia, second life, and beyond. From production to produsage. Peter Lang, New York
Buschman M, Michalek A (2013) Are alternative metrics still alternative? Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 39(4):35–39
Buzzetto-More NA (2013) Social media and prosumerism. Issues Inf Sci Inf Technol 10:81–93
Cheung M (2013) Altmetrics: too soon for use in assessment. Nature 494(7436):176
Cronin B (1984) The citation process. The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. Taylor Graham, London
Downes S (2005) E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine. http://elearnmag.acm.org/featured.cfm?aid=1104968. Accessed 15 June 2014
Faris DM (2013) Dissent and revolution in a digital age. Social media, blogging and activism in Egypt. Tauris, London
Fenner M (2014) Altmetrics and other novel measures for scientific impact. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, Heidelberg; New York, pp 179–190
Frey B, Osterloh M (2011) Ranking games. University of Zurich Department of Economics Working Paper No. 39. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1957162. Accessed 22 June 2014
Friesike S, Schildhauer T (2015) Open science: many good resolutions, very few incentives, yet. In: Welpe IM, Wollersheim J, Ringelhan S, Osterloh M (eds) Incentives and performance – governance of research organizations. Springer, Cham
Gaffney D, Puschmann C (2014) Data collection on Twitter. In: Weller K, Bruns A, Burgess J, Mahrt M, Puschmann C (eds) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, pp 55–68
Galligan F, Dyas-Correia S (2013) Altmetrics: rethinking the way we measure. Ser Rev 39(1):56–61
Gerber A (2012) Online trends from the first German trend study on science communication. In: Tokar A, Beurskens M, Keuneke S, Mahrt M, Peters I, Puschmann C, van Treeck T, Weller K (eds) Science and the internet. Düsseldorf University Press, Düsseldorf, pp 13–18
Haustein S, Larivière V (2015) The use of bibliometrics for assessing research: possibilities, limitations and adverse effects. In: Welpe IM, Wollersheim J, Ringelhan S, Osterloh M (eds) Incentives and performance – governance of research organizations. Springer, Cham
Haustein S, Peters I, Bar-Ilan J, Priem J, Shema H, Terliesner J (2013) Coverage and adoption of altmetrics sources in the bibliometric community. In: Proceedings of the 14th international society of scientometrics and informatics conference, Vienna, Austria, 15–19th July 2013, pp 1–12
Haustein S, Bowman TD, Holmberg K, Peters I, Larivière V (2014a) Astrophysicists on Twitter: an in-depth analysis of tweeting and scientific publication behavior. Aslib J Inf Manag 66(3):279–296
Haustein S, Larivière V, Thelwall M, Amyot D, Peters I (2014b) Tweets vs. Mendeley readers: how do these two social media metrics differ? Inf Technol 56(5) (in press)
Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Larivière V (2014c) Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 65(4):656–669
Henning V, Reichelt J (2008) Mendeley. A Last.fm for research? In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE international conference on eScience, Indianapolis, pp 327–328
Hey T (2005) Cyberinfrastructure for e-Science. Science 308(5723):817–821
Hey T, Trefethen A (2003) The data deluge: an e-Science perspective. In: Berman F, Fox CG (eds) Grid computing. Making the global infrastructure a reality. Wiley, Chichester, pp 809–824
Holmberg K, Thelwall M (2014) Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3
Kaplan AM, Haenlein M (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horizons 53(1):59–68
Kousha K, Thelwall M (2008) Assessing the impact of disciplinary research on teaching. An automatic analysis of online syllabuses. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:2060–2069
Lapinski S, Piwowar H, Priem J (2013) Riding the crest of the altmetrics wave: how librarians can help prepare faculty for the next generation of research impact metrics. Coll Res Libr News 74(6):292–294 + 300
Letierce J, Passant A, Breslin J, Decker S (2010) Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In: Proceedings of the WebSci10: extending the frontiers of society on-line, Raleigh
Leydesdorff L (1995) The challenge of scientometrics. The development, measurement and self-organization of scientific communication. DSWO, Leiden
Li N, Gillet D (2013) Identifying influential scholars in academic social media platforms. In: Proceedings of the 2013 IEEEACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining. ACM, New York, pp 608–614
Li X, Thelwall M, Giustini D (2012) Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement. Scientometrics 91(2):461–471
Lin J, Fenner M (2013) The many faces of article-level metrics. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 39(4):27–30
Liu J, Adie E (2013a) Five challenges in altmetrics: a toolmaker's perspective. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 39(4):31–34
Liu J, Adie E (2013b) New perspectives on article-level metrics: developing ways to assess research uptake and impact online. Insights UKSG J 26(2):153–158
MacRoberts M, MacRoberts BR (1989) Problems of citation analysis. A critical review. J Am Soc Inf Sci 40(5):342–349
Mahrt M, Weller K, Peters I (2014) Twitter in scholarly communication. In: Weller K, Bruns A, Burgess J, Mahrt M, Puschmann C (eds) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, pp 399–410
Maness J (2006) Library 2.0 theory. Web 2.0 and its implications for libraries. Webology 3(2):Article 25. http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html. Accessed 14 June 2014
McNab C (2009) What social media offers to health professionals and citizens. Bull World Health Organ 89(8):566–567
Nentwich M (2003) Cyberscience. Research in the age of the internet. Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, Vienna
Nentwich M, König R (2012) Cyberscience 2.0. Research in the age of digital social networks. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt; New York
Nentwich M, König R (2014) Academia goes facebook? The potential of social network sites in the scholarly realm. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, Heidelberg; New York, pp 107–124
O’Reilly T (2005) What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html. Accessed 14 June 2014
Pampel H, Dallmeier-Tiessen S (2014) Open research data. From vision to practice. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, Heidelberg; New York, pp 213–224
Papacharissi Z (ed) (2009) Journalism and citizenship. New agendas in communication. Routledge, New York
Peters I (2009) Folksonomies. Indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0. De Gruyter/Saur, Berlin
Pinkowitz I (2002) Research dissemination and impact. Evidence from web site downloads. J Financ 57:485–499
Piwowar H (2013a) Altmetrics. What, why and where? Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 39(4):8–9
Piwowar H (2013b) Altmetrics: value all research products. Nature 493(7431):159
Piwowar H, Priem J (2013) The power of altmetrics on a CV. Bull Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 39(4):10–13
Priem J, Taborelli D, Groth P, Nylon C (2010) Alt-metrics. A manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/. Accessed 15 June 2014
Priem J, Piwowar H, Hemminger B (2012) Altmetrics in the wild. Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv:1203.4745v1. Accessed 15 June 2014
Procter R, Williams R, Stewart JK, Poschen M, Snee H, Voss A, Asgari-Targhi M (2010) Adoption and use of Web 2.0 in scholarly communications. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 368(1926):4039–4056
Samoilenko A, Yasseri T (2013) The distorted mirror of Wikipedia. A quantitative analysis of Wikipedia coverage of academics. http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.8508. Accessed 15 June 2014
Shuai X, Jiang Z, Liu X, Bollen J (2013) A comparative study of academic and Wikipedia ranking. In: JCDL’13 Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries. ACM, Indianapolis, pp 25–28
Silverman C (ed) (2014) Verification handbook. A definitive guide to verifying digital content for emergency coverage. European Journalism Centre, Maastricht
Sitek D, Bertelmann R (2014) Open access. A state of the art. In: Bartling S, Friesike S (eds) Opening science. The evolving guide on how the internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing. Springer, Heidelberg; New York, pp 139–145
Thelwall M (2008) Bibliometrics to webometrics. J Inf Sci 34(4):605–621
Thelwall M, Kousha K (2008) Online presentations as a source of scientific impact? An analysis of PowerPoint files citing academic journals. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 59:805–815
Thelwall M, Kousha K (2014) Academia.edu: social network or academic network? J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 65(4):721–731
Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto C (2013) Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS ONE 8(5)
Tochtermann K (2014) How science 2.0 will impact on scientific libraries. Inf Technol 56(5) (in press)
Tokar A, Beurskens M, Keuneke S, Mahrt M, Peters I, Puschmann C, van Treeck T, Weller K (eds) (2012) Science and the internet. Düsseldorf University Press, Düsseldorf
Viney I (2013) Altmetrics: research council responds. Nature 494(7436):176
Waldrop MM (2008) Science 2.0. Sci Am 298(5):68–73
Weller K, Peters I (2012) Twitter for scientific communication. How can citations/references be identified and measured? In: Tokar A, Beurskens M, Keuneke S, Mahrt M, Peters I, Puschmann C, van Treeck T, Weller K (eds) Science and the internet. Düsseldorf University Press, Düsseldorf, pp 211–224
Weller K, Mainz D, Mainz I, Paulsen I (2007) Wissenschaft 2.0? Social Software im Einsatz für die Wissenschaft. In: Ockenfeld M (ed) Information in Wissenschaft, Bildung und Wirtschaft. Proceedings der 29. Online-Tagung der DGI, Frankfurt am Main, pp 121–136
Weller K, Dornstädter R, Freimanis R, Klein RN, Perez M (2010) Social software in academia: three studies on users’ acceptance of Web 2.0 services. In: Proceedings of the 2nd web science conference (WebSci10), Raleigh
Zahedi Z, Costas R, Wouters P (2014) How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of’alternative metrics’ in scientific publications. http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1301. Accessed 15 June 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Weller, K. (2015). Social Media and Altmetrics: An Overview of Current Alternative Approaches to Measuring Scholarly Impact. In: Welpe, I., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Incentives and Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09784-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09785-5
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)