With Us or Against Us: Simulated Social Touch by Virtual Agents in a Cooperative or Competitive Setting

  • Gijs Huisman
  • Jan Kolkmeier
  • Dirk Heylen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8637)

Abstract

In this paper we examine how simulated social touch by a virtual agent in a cooperative or competitive augmented reality game influences the perceived trustworthiness, warmth and politeness of the agent. Before and after the game, participants interact with two agents whereby one agent touches the participant’s arm. Results showed no significant difference in how agents are perceived in the cooperative and competitive situation. However, significant differences between perception of the touching and non-touching agents could be observed for warmth.

Keywords

Simulated social touch virtual agent Augmented reality 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailenson, J.N., Yee, N., Patel, K., Beall, A.C.: Detecting digital chameleons. Computers in Human Behavior 24(1), 66–87 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bailenson, J., Yee, N., Brave, S., Merget, D., Koslow, D.: Virtual interpersonal touch: Expressing and recognizing emotions through haptic devices. Human-Computer Interaction 22(3), 325–353 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beelen, T., Blaauboer, R., Bovenmars, N., Loos, B., Zielonka, L., van Delden, R., Huisman, G., Reidsma, D.: The art of tug of war: Investigating the influence of remote touch on social presence in a distributed rope pulling game. In: Reidsma, D., Katayose, H., Nijholt, A. (eds.) ACE 2013. LNCS, vol. 8253, pp. 246–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickmore, T.W., Fernando, R., Ring, L., Schulman, D.: Empathic Touch by Relational Agents. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 1(1), 60–71 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Camps, J., Tuteleers, C., Stouten, J., Nelissen, J.: A situational touch: How touch affects people’s decision behavior. Social Influence 8(4), 237–250 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cramer, H., Kemper, N., Amin, A., Wielinga, B., Evers, V.: give me a hug: the effects of touch and autonomy on people’s responses to embodied social agents. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds 20(2-3), 437–445 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dehn, D., Van Mulken, S.: The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 52(1), 1–22 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ditzen, B., Neumann, I.D., Bodenmann, G., von Dawans, B., Turner, R.A., Ehlert, U., Heinrichs, M.: Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women. Psychoneuroendocrinology 32(5), 565–574 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Drescher, V.M., Gantt, W.H., Whitehead, W.E.: Heart rate response to touch. Psychosomatic Medicine 42(6), 559–565 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guéguen, N., Jacob, C., Boulbry, G.: The effect of touch on compliance with a restaurant’s employee suggestion. International Journal of Hospitality Management 26(4), 1019–1023 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haans, A., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Mediated social touch: a review of current research and future directions. Virtual Reality 9(2-3), 149–159 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haans, A., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: The Virtual Midas Touch: Helping Behavior After a Mediated Social Touch. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 2(3), 136–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haans, A., de Nood, C., IJsselsteijn, W.A.: Investigating response similarities between real and mediated social touch: a first test. In: Proceedings of CHI 2007, pp. 2405–2410. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henricson, M., Ersson, A., Määttä, S., Segesten, K., Berglund, A.L.: The outcome of tactile touch on stress parameters in intensive care: a randomized controlled trial. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice 14(4), 244–254 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hertenstein, M.J., Keltner, D., App, B., Bulleit, B.A., Jaskolka, A.R.: Touch communicates distinct emotions. Emotion 6(3), 528–533 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hertenstein, M.J., Verkamp, J.M., Kerestes, A.M., Holmes, R.M.: The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: A review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 132(1), 5–94 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jones, S.E., Yarbrough, A.E.: A naturalistic study of the meanings of touch. Communication Monographs 52(1), 19–56 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakagawa, K., Shiomi, M., Shinozawa, K., Matsumura, R., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Effect of robot’s active touch on people’s motivation. In: HRI 2011, pp. 465–472. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patterson, M.L., Powell, J.L., Lenihan, M.G.: Touch, compliance, and interpersonal affect. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 10(1), 41–50 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ter Maat, M., Truong, K.P., Heylen, D.: How turn-taking strategies influence users’ impressions of an agent. In: Allbeck, J., Badler, N., Bickmore, T., Pelachaud, C., Safonova, A. (eds.) IVA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6356, pp. 441–453. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitcher, S.J., Fisher, J.D.: Multidimensional reaction to therapeutic touch in a hospital setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(1), 87–96 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gijs Huisman
    • 1
  • Jan Kolkmeier
    • 1
  • Dirk Heylen
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Media Interaction GroupUniversity of TwenteThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations