Advertisement

A Visit on the Uncanny Hill

  • Petr ŠvarnýEmail author
Chapter
  • 2.5k Downloads
Part of the Topics in Intelligent Engineering and Informatics book series (TIEI, volume 9)

Abstract

The article shortly introduces the Uncanny valley hypothesis and sums up some of the research performed in the field connected to it. Thereafter, it explores some possible new approaches in robot design. The main hypothesis is that pleasant human-robot interaction is based in the habituation of humans to this kind of interaction. This pleasant interaction can be accomplished by exploiting the human tendency to ascribe intentionality to even simple entities or by letting robots express emotion-like states through vocal communication. A possible risk of a new Uncanny valley phenomenon, from the view of artificial intelligence, is also described.

Keywords

human-robot interaction uncanny valley 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Mori, M.: Bukimi no tani. Energy 7(4), 33–35 (1970)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mori, M., MacDorman, K.F., da Kageki, N.: The uncanny valley (from the field). Robotics & Automation Magazine 19(2), 98–100 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ho, C., MacDorman, K.: Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior 26(6), 1508–1518 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hanson, D., Olney, A., Prilliman, S., Mathews, E., Zielke, M., Hammons, D., Fernandez, R., Stephanou, H.: Upending the uncanny valley. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 40(4). AAAI Press, MIT Press (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cleveland, A., Kobiella, A., Striano, T.: Intention or expression? four-month-olds reactions to a sudden still-face. Infant Behavior and Development 29(3), 299–307 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hadjikhani, N., Kveraga, K., Naik, P., Ahlfors, S.: Early (n170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects. Neuroreport 20(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asada Laboratory: Constructive developmental science based on understanding the process from neuro-dynamics to social interaction (2012), http://www.er.ams.eng.osaka.ac.jp/asadalab/tokusui/research_en.html (accessed: May 31, 2013)
  8. 8.
    McCloud, S.: Understanding comics: The invisible art. Harper Paperbacks (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Szollosy, M.: Why are we afraid of robots? the role of projection in the popular conception of robots. In: Romportl, J., Ircing, P., Žáčková, E., Polak, M., Schuster, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Conference Beyond AI 2012. University of West Bohemia (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weizenbaum, J.: Eliza—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM 9(1), 36–45 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of ArtsCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations