Skip to main content

Towards Pedagogy-Driven Learning Design: A Case Study of Problem-Based Learning Design

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNISA,volume 8613)

Abstract

Existing learning design languages are pedagogy-neutral. They provide insufficient support to explicitly represent pedagogy-specific approaches such as problem-based learning (PBL). As the first step towards pedagogy-driven learning design, we developed a PBL design language and an associated authoring tool by adopting a domain-specific language (DSL) approach. The language and the tool provide means for teachers to think and represent their own PBL designs in vocabularies that the teacher daily uses to describe their PBL approaches. This paper presents a case study to investigate whether the language and the tool can facilitate the design of a PBL course plan. Although participants had minimal knowledge of PBL and were not skilled in process modeling, after a short training they were able to prepare their own PBL course plans using the PBL authoring tool. They reported that the vocabularies in the PBL design language were easy to understand. Some thought that the tool provides flexibility and others did not think so. Nevertheless, some found the process somewhat difficult to represent the narrative into a course plan. In addition, most participants found that the tool is user-friendly and easy to learn.

Keywords

  • Learning design
  • IMS-LD
  • DSL
  • PBL
  • PBL design language
  • case study

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_20
  • Chapter length: 11 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-09635-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agostinho, S., Harper, B., Oliver, R., Hedberg, J., Wills, S.: A visual learning design representation to facilitate dissemination and reuse of innovative pedagogical strategies in university teaching. In: Botturi, L., Stubbs, T. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theories and Practices. Information Science Reference (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albanese, M.A., Mitchell, S.: Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 68, 52–81 (1993)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrows, H.: The Tutorial Process. Springfield Illinois: Southern Illinois University School of Medicin (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beetham, H., Sharpe, R. (eds.): Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Routledge Falmer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Lockyer, L., Harper, B., Lukasiak, J.: Supporting university teachers create pedagogically sound learning environments using learning designs and learning objects. International Journal on WWW/Internet 4(1), 16–26 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bloom, B.S. (ed.): Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals – Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Conole, G., Oliver, M., Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A., Harvey, J.: Designing for learning. In: Conole, G., Oliver, M. (eds.) Contemporary Perspectives in e-Learning Research: Themes, Methods and Impact on Practice. Routledge Falmer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conole, G., Brasher, A., Cross, S., Weller, M., Clark, P., White, J.: Visualising learning design to foster and support good practice and creativity. Educational Media International 54(3), 177–194 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalziel, J.: Implementing learning design: The Learning Activity Management system (LAMS). In: Proc. Ascilite Conference, pp. 593–596. Ascilite, Figtree (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. van Deursen, A., Klint, P., Visser, J.: Domain-specific languages: an annotatedbibliography. SIGPLAN Notices 35(6), 26–36 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Falconer, I., Littlejohn, A.: Representing Models of Practice. In: Lockyer, L., Bennet, S., Agostinho, S., Harper, B. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies, pp. 20–40. IDEA group (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gagné, R.: The Conditions of Learning and the Theory of Instruction, 4th edn. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Graaff, E., Kolmos, A.: History of problem-based and project-based learning. In: de Graaff, E., Kolmos, A. (eds.) Management of Change: Implementation of Problem-Based and Project-Based Learning in Engineering, pp. 1–8. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Griffithsa, D., Beauvoira, P., Libera, O., Barrett-Baxendaleb, M.: From Reload to ReCourse: learning from IMS Learning Design implementations. Distance Education 30(2), 201–222 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Harrer, A., Hoppe, U.: Visual Modelling of Collaborative Learning Processes – Uses, Desired Properties, and Approaches. In: Botturi, L., Stubbs, S.T. (eds.) Handbook of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: Theory and Practices, pp. 281–298. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Eberbach, C.: Learning theories and problem-based learning. In: Bridges, S., et al. (eds.) Researching Problem-Based Learning in Clinical Education: The Next Generation, pp. 3–17. Springer, New York (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. IMS Learning Design Specification (2003), http://www.imsglobal.org

  18. Kolmos, A., Graaff, E.D.: Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education 19(5), 657–662 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koper, E.J.R.: Modeling Units of Study from a Pedagogical Perspective: The Pedagogical Meta-Model Behind EML. Open University of the Netherlands (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Koper, R., Tattersall, C. (eds.): Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuutti, K.: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi, B.A. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laanpere, M., Pata, K., Normak, P., Põldoja, H.: Pedagogy-driven Design of Digital Learning Ecosystems. Computer Science and Information Systems 11(1), 419–442 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Lockyer, L., Bennett, S., Agostinho, S., Harper, B.: Handbook of Research on Learning Design and Learning Objects: Issues, Applications and Technologies. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Martel, C., Vignollet, L., Ferraris, C., David, J., Lejeune, A.: Modelling collaborative learning activities in e-learning platforms. In: Proc. of ICALT 2006, pp. 707–709. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Miao, Y., Hoeksema, K., Hoppe, U., Harrer, A.: CSCL Scripts: Modeling Features and Potential Use. In: Proceedings of CSCL 2005, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 423–432 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Miao, Y., Koper, R.: An Efficient and Flexible Technical Approach to Develop and Deliver Online Peer Assessment. In: Proceedings of the 7th Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, New Jersey, USA, July 16-21, pp. 502–511 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Neumann, S., Oberhuemer, P.: User Evaluation of a Graphical Modeling Tool for IMS Learning Design. In: Spaniol, M., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.) ICWL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5686, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliver, R., Littlejohn, A.: Discovering and describing accessible and reusable practitioner-focused learning. In: Minshull, G., Mole, J. (eds.) Proceedings of Theme 1 of the JISC Online Conference: Innovating e-Learning, pp. 30–33 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ryberg, T., Glud, L.N., Buus, L., Georgsen, M.: Identifying differences in understandings of PBL, theory and Interactional interdependencies. In: Proc. 7th International Conference on Networked Learning, pp. 943–951 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkerson, L., Gijselaers, W.H. (eds.): Bringing Problem-Based Learning to Higher Education: Theory and Practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, vol. 68. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Woods, D.R.: Problem Based Learning: How to Get the Most from PBL, 3rd edn., vol. 20(6), pp. 481–486. McMaster University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Miao, Y., Ally, M., Samaka, M., Tsinakos, A.A. (2014). Towards Pedagogy-Driven Learning Design: A Case Study of Problem-Based Learning Design. In: Popescu, E., Lau, R.W.H., Pata, K., Leung, H., Laanpere, M. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2014. ICWL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09634-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09635-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)