Skip to main content

Spontaneous Segregation of Agents Across Double Auction Markets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Economics

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the possibility of spontaneous segregation into groups of traders that have to choose among several markets. Even in the simplest case of two markets and Zero Intelligence traders, we are able to observe segregation effects below a critical value T c of the temperature T; the latter regulates how strongly traders bias their decisions towards choices with large accumulated scores. It is notable that segregation occurs even though the traders are statistically homogeneous. Traders can in principle change their loyalty to a market, but the relevant persistence times become long below T c .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hanaki et al. (2011) uses the same rule with \(\omega = 1 - r\), while in Sato and Crutchfield (2003) the prescription used was \(A(n + 1) = S(n) + (1-\alpha )A(n)\). The second rule allows the attractions to increase to infinity, while in the first case, they are constrained. However, up to a temperature rescaling, the two rules are equivalent. The more important difference is that in the paper (Sato and Crutchfield 2003), the attractions of unplayed actions are updated with fictitious scores an agent would have got had he played the action, while we effectively update them with score S(n) = 0.

  2. 2.

    The softmax function is commonly used in models of learning agents, see for example Hanaki et al. (2011), Sato and Crutchfield (2003). Another common formulation of the softmax function is \(P_{\gamma } \propto \exp (\beta A_{\gamma })\), where \(\beta = 1/T\) is sometimes called the intensity of choice as in Brock and Hommes (1997).

  3. 3.

    Note that traders are not informed about these market biases, nor the market mechanism in general; they learn only by means of the scores they receive.

  4. 4.

    We note that also in Gode and Sunder (1993), agents were preassigned the role of a buyer or a seller and were not allowed to change this during trading, thus acting as if there was no overall constraint on the possession of money/goods for trade.

  5. 5.

    See: http://www.bis.gov.uk/foresight/our-work/projects/published-projects/computer-trading.

References

  • Brock WA, Hommes CH (1997) Rational route to randomness. Econometrica 65(5):321–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai K, Gerding E, McBurney P, Niu J, Parsons S, Phelps S (2009) Cat overview. Technical report, University of Liverpool

    Google Scholar 

  • Findings Regarding the Market Events of May 6, 2010 (2010) Report of the staffs of the CFTC and SEC to the joint advisory committee on emerging regulatory issues

    Google Scholar 

  • Gode DK, Sunder S (1993) Allocative efficiency of markets with zero-intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. J Polit Econ 101(1):119–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanaki N, Kirman A, Marsili M (2011) Born under a lucky star?. J Econ Behav Organ 77(3):382–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z, Zhang J, Dong J, Huang L, Lai Y (2012) Emergence of grouping in multi-resource minority game dynamics. Sci Rep 2:703

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladley D (2012) Zero intelligence in economics and finance. Knowl Eng Rev 27(2):273–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan G, Meyer RL, Hushak LJ (1995) Segmentation in the informal credit markets - the case of the Philippines. Agric Econ 12(2):171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson E, McBurney P, Yao X (2012) Co-learning segmentation in marketplaces. In: Adaptive and Learning Agents, vol 7113. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Sato Y, Crutchfield JP (2003) Coupled replicator equations for the dynamics of learning in multiagent systems. Phys Rev E 67(1):015206

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aleksandra Alorić .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alorić, A., Sollich, P., McBurney, P. (2015). Spontaneous Segregation of Agents Across Double Auction Markets. In: Amblard, F., Miguel, F., Blanchet, A., Gaudou, B. (eds) Advances in Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09578-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics