Skip to main content

Analyzing Social Interactions: The Promises and Challenges of Using Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Translational Recurrences

Abstract

The scientific investigation of social interactions presents substantial challenges: interacting agents engage each other at many different levels and timescales (motor and physiological coordination, joint attention, linguistic exchanges, etc.), often making their behaviors interdependent in non-linear ways. In this paper we review the current use of Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis (CRQA) in the analysis of social interactions, and assess its potential and challenges. We argue that the method can sensitively grasp the dynamics of human interactions, and that it has started producing valuable knowledge about them. However, much work is still necessary: more systematic analyses and interpretation of the recurrence indexes and more consistent reporting of the results,more emphasis on theory-driven studies, exploring interactions involving more than 2 agents and multiple aspects of coordination,and assessing and quantifying complementary coordinative mechanisms. These challenges are discussed and operationalized in recommendations to further develop the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The review was accomplished by searching for “cross recurrence” and “crqa” on PubMed, Google Scholar and Web of Science (on October 1\(^{\text {st}}\) 2013) and then manually selecting the articles analyzing social interactions. We followed up on the bibliography of these articles to individuate further relevant ones. The resulting list counts 41 articles, 34 of which reporting empirical studies and the rest being reviews or method papers. To these we added 6 submitted, but not yet published papers.

  2. 2.

    The characters (including spaces) are converted to numbers, the embedding dimensions are set to 3, and the threshold to 0, to respect the categorical nature of the data.

References

  1. Kimmel, M.: Intersubjectivity at close quarters: how dancers of Tango Argentino use imagery for interaction and improvisation. J. Cogn. Semiot. 4, 76–124 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kiefer, A.W., et al.: Quantifying the coherence of pedestrian groups. in Cog Sci 2013, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fusaroli, R., et al.: Coming to terms: an experimental quantification of the coordinative benefits of linguistic interaction. Psychol. Sci. 23(8), 931–939 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hutchins, E.: How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cogn. Sci. 19(3), 265–288 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Miller, J.H., Page, S.E.: Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton Studies in Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dale, R., et al.: The self-organization of human interaction. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 59, 43–95 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hasson, U., et al.: Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16(2), 114–121 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Steptoe, A., et al.: Social isolation, loneliness, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. PNAS 110(15), 5797–5801 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Orden, G.C., Holden, J.G., Turvey, M.T.: Self-organization of cognitive performance. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132(3), 331 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fusaroli, R., Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., Tylén, K.: Dialog as interpersonal synergy. N. Ideas Psychol. 32, 147–157 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Riley, M.A., et al.: Interpersonal synergies. Frontiers Psychol. 2, 38 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Konvalinka, I., Roepstorff, A.: The two-brain approach: how can mutually interacting brains teach us something about social interaction? Frontiers Human Neurosci. 6, 1 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bakeman, R., Gottman, J.: Observing Interaction: An Introduction to Sequential Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Chartrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A.: The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76(6), 893–910 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pickering, M.J., Garrod, S.: Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behav. Brain Sci. 27(02), 169–190 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K.: Carving Language for Social Coordination: a dynamic approach Interaction studies 13(1), 103–123 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sacheli, L.M., et al.: Kinematics fingerprints of leader and follower role-taking during cooperative joint actions. Exp. Brain Res. 226, 473–486 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Skewes, J., et al.: Implicit negotiation of leader-follower dynamics in an asymmetric joint aiming task. (under Revision)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noy, L., Dekel, E., Alon, U.: The mirror game as a paradigm for studying the dynamics of two people improvising motion together. PNAS 108(52), 20947–20952 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., Knoblich, G.: Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10(2), 70–76 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Masumoto, J., Inui, N.: Two heads are better than one: both complementary and synchronous strategies facilitate joint action. J. Neurophysiol. 109(5), 1307–1314 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mills, G.: Dialogue in joint activity: complementarity, convergence and conventionalization. N. Ideas Psychol. 32, 158–173 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vilar, L., et al.: Coordination tendencies are shaped by attacker and defender interactions with the goal and the ball in futsal. Hum. Mov. Sci. 33, 14–24 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dale, R., Warlaumont, A.S., Richardson, D.C.: Nominal cross recurrence as a generalized lag sequential analysis for behavioral streams. Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 21, 1153–1161 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Coco, M.I., Dale, R.: Cross-recurrence quantification analysis of categorical and continuous time series: an R package. arXiv preprint arXiv:1310.0201, (2013)

  26. Zbilut, J.P., Giuliani, A., Webber, C.L.: Detecting deterministic signals in exceptionally noisy environments using cross-recurrence quantification. Phys. Lett. A 246(1), 122–128 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marwan, N., et al.: Recurrence plots for the analysis of complex systems. Phys. Rep. 438(5–6), 237–329 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Takens, F., Rand, D.A., Young, L.S.: Detecting Strange Attractors in Turbulence, in Dynamical Systems and Turbulence, pp. 366–381. Springer, Berlin (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marwan, N.: Cross recurrence plot toolbox. Available at http://tocsy.pik-potsdam.de/crp.php (2012)

  30. Orsucci, F., Giuliani, A., Webber, C.: Combinatorics and synchronization in natural semiotics. Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 361(2), 665–676 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Isenhower, R.W., et al.: Rhythmic bimanual coordination is impaired in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 6(1), 25–31 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kelso, J.A.S.: Dynamic Patterns: The Self-organization of Brain and Behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995). (4 p. of plates)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richardson, M.J., et al.: Rocking together: dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Hum. Mov. Sci. 26(6), 867–891 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shockley, K., et al.: Cross recurrence quantification of coupled oscillators. Phys. Lett. A 305(1–2), 59–69 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Richardson, M.J., et al.: Comparing the attractor strength of intra- and interpersonal interlimb coordination using cross-recurrence analysis. Neurosci. Lett. 438(3), 340–345 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Louwerse, M.M., et al.: Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. 36(8), 1404–1426 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ramenzoni, V.C., et al.: Joint action in a cooperative precision task: nested processes of intrapersonal and interpersonal coordination. Exp. Brain Res. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Experimentation Cerebrale 211(3–4), 447–457 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Konvalinka, I., et al.: Synchronized arousal between performers and related spectators in a fire-walking ritual. PNAS 108(20), 8514–8519 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fusaroli, R., Bjørndahl, J., Tylén, K.: A Heart for Coordination: investigating speech, gesture and heart rate in a collective, creative construction task. submitted

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ramenzoni, V.C., et al.: Interpersonal and intrapersonal coordinative modes for joint and single task performance. Human Movement Science, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  41. Varni, G., et al.: Toward a real-time automated measure of empathy and dominance. In: IEEE International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, CSE’09 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Varni, G., Volpe, G., Camurri, A.: A system for real-time multimodal analysis of nonverbal affective social interaction in user-centric media. IEEE Trans. Multimedia 12(6), 576–590 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Reddy, V., Markova, G., Wallot, S.: Anticipatory adjustments to being picked up in infancy. PLoS ONE 8(6), e65289 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wallot, S., et al.: Division of labor as a cooperative strategy during complex joint action. submitted

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tylén, K., et al.: Language as a tool for interacting minds. Mind Lang. 25(1), 3–29 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Clark, H.H.: Using Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Shockley, K., Santana, M.V., Fowler, C.A.: Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform 29(2), 326–332 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Shockley, K., Richardson, D.C., Dale, R.: Conversation and coordinative structures. Topics Cogn. Sci. 1(2), 305–319 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shockley, K., et al.: Articulatory constraints on interpersonal postural coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform 33(1), 201–208 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Richardson, M.J., Marsh, K.L., Schmidt, R.C.: Effects of visual and verbal interaction on unintentional interpersonal coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 62–79 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Marsh, K.L., Richardson, M.J., Schmidt, R.C.: Social connection through joint action and interpersonal coordination. Topics Cogn. Sci. 1(2), 320–339 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Reuzel, E., et al.: Conversational synchronization in naturally occurring settings: a recurrence-based analysis of gaze directions and speech rhythms of staff and clients with intellectual disability. J. Nonverbal Behav. 37(4), 281–305 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ashenfelter, K.T.: Simultaneous Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Data During Conversation\(\vert \) Symmetry and Turn-taking. University of Notre Dame, Indiana (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R.: Looking to understand: the coupling between speakers’ and listeners’ eye movements and its relationship to discourse comprehension. Cogn. Sci. 29(6), 1045–1060 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Kirkham, N.Z.: The art of conversation is coordination: common ground and the coupling of eye movements during dialogue. Psychol. Sci. 18(5), 407–413 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Richardson, D.C., Dale, R., Tomlinson, J.M.: Conversation, gaze coordination, and beliefs about visual context. Cogn. Sci. 33(8), 1468–1482 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Dale, R., Kirkham, N.Z., Richardson, D.C.: The dynamics of reference and shared visual attention. Front. Psychol. 2, 355 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Diderichsen, P.: Cross recurrence quantification analysis of indefinite anaphora in swedish dialog. An eye-tracking pilot experiment. In: Brandial’06: Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (SemDial-10), Universitätsverlag Potsdam, Germany, 11–13 September 2006

    Google Scholar 

  59. Jermann, P., Nüssli, M.-A.: Effects of sharing text selections on gaze cross-recurrence and interaction quality in a pair programming task. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Fusaroli, R., Gangopadhyay, N., Tylén, K.: The dialogically extended mind: making a case for language as skilful intersubjective engagement. Cogn. Syst. Res. 29–30, 31–39 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Fusaroli, R., Tylén, K.: Investigating conversational dynamics: interactive alignment, interpersonal synergies, and collective task performance. (under Revision)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Warlaumont, A.S., et al.: Vocal interaction dynamics of children with and without autism. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. TX: Cognitive Science Society, Austin, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Cox, R.F., van Dijk, M.: Microdevelopment in parent-child conversations: from global changes to flexibility. Ecol. Psychol. 25(3), 304–315 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., et al.: Linguistic interaction as coordinative structure: Relationship between supraindividual and subjective. submitted

    Google Scholar 

  65. Gorman, J.C., et al.: Measuring patterns in team interaction sequences using a discrete recurrence approach. Hum. Factors: J Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 54(4), 503–517 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Buder, E.H., et al.: Dynamic indicators of mother-infant prosodic and illocutionary coordination. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Speech Prosody, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Michael, J., et al.: Compensatory Strategies Enhance Rapport in Interactions Involving People with Möbius Syndrome. submitted

    Google Scholar 

  68. Orsucci, F., Giuliani, A., Zbilut, J.: Structure & coupling of semiotic sets. Experimental Chaos 742, 83–93 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Orsucci, F., et al.: Prosody and synchronization in cognitive neuroscience. EPJ Nonlinear Biomed. Phys. 1(1), 1–11 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Orsucci, F., et al.: Orthographic structuring of human speech and texts: linguistic application of recurrence quantification analysis. Arxiv preprint cmp-lg/9712010 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Dale, R., Spivey, M.J.: Unraveling the dyad: using recurrence analysis to explore patterns of syntactic coordination between children and caregivers in conversation. Lang. Learn. 56(3), 391–430 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Dale, R., Louwerse. M.M.: Human interaction as a multimodal network structure. In: Conceptual Structures, Discourse, and Language (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Bahrami, B., et al.: Optimally interacting minds. Science 329, 1081–1085 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Angus, D., Smith, A., Wiles, J.: Human communication as coupled time series: quantifying multi-participant recurrence. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 20, 1795–1807 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Angus, D., Smith, A., Wiles, J.: Conceptual recurrence plots: revealing patterns in human discourse. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 18(6), 988–997 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Angus, D., et al.: Visualising conversation structure across time: insights into effective doctor-patient consultations. PloS ONE 7(6), e38014 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Leonardi, G.: The study of language and conversation with recurrence analysis methods. Psychol. Lang. Commun. 16(2), 165–183 (2012)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  78. Marsh, K.L., et al.: Autism and social disconnection in interpersonal rocking. Frontiers Integr. Neurosci. 7, 4 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Lakens, D.: Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and anovas. Frontiers Psychol. 4, 863 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Dienes, Z.: Understanding Psychology as a Science : An Introduction to Scientific and Statistical Inference, p. 170. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  81. Plonsky, L.: In: Porte, G. (ed.) Replication, Meta-analysis, and Generalizability. Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Cumming, G.: The new statistics why and how. Psychol. Sci. 25(1), 7–29 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Dale, R., et al.: Beyond synchrony: complementarity and asynchrony in joint action. In: Cognitive Science (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  84. Thomasson, N., Webber, C., Zbilut, J.P.: Application of recurrence quantification analysis to EEG signals. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 9, 9–14 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  85. Marwan, N., Kurths, J., Saparin, P.: Generalised recurrence plot analysis for spatial data. Phys. Lett. A 360(4), 545–551 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kokal, I., Gazzola, V., Keysers, C.: Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system. Neuroimage 47(4), 2046–2056 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Newman-Norlund, S.E., et al.: Recipient design in tacit communication. Cognition 111, 46–54 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., Knoblich, G.: Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10(2), 70–76 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Lang, M., et al.: Lost in the rhythm: the effects of rhythm on subsequent interpersonal co-ordination. underRevision

    Google Scholar 

  90. Fusaroli, R., et al.: Non-linear dynamics of speech and voice in schizophrenia. in Neurobiology of Language 2013, San Diego (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  91. Fusaroli, R., Bang, D., Weed, E.: Non-linear analyses of speech and prosody in asperger’s syndrome. In: IMFAR 2013, San Sebastian (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  92. Fusaroli, R., et al.: Non-linear dynamics of voice in mental disorders. in Cog Sci 2013, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  93. Weed, E., Fusaroli, R.: Prosodic production in right-hemisphere stroke patients: using temporal dynamics to characterize voice quality. in Neurobiology of Language (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  94. Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Kelso, J.A.S.: Reconciling symbolic and dynamic aspects of language: toward a dynamic psycholinguistics. N. Ideas Psychol. 26(2), 193–207 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Fusaroli, R., et al.: Conversation, coupling and complexity: matching scaling laws predict performance in a joint decision task. in Cog Sci 2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  96. Chen, Y., Yang, H.: Multiscale recurrence analysis of long-term nonlinear and nonstationary time series. Chaos Solitons Fractals 45(7), 978–987 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Xiang, R., et al.: Multiscale characterization of recurrence-based phase space networks constructed from time series. Chaos 22(1), 013107 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Lancia, L., Avelino, H. Voigt, D.: Measuring laryngealization in running speech: interaction with contrastive tones in Yalálag Zapotec. In: Interspeech 2013. in press

    Google Scholar 

  99. Lancia, L., Fuchs, S., Tiede, M.: Application of concepts from cross-recurrence analysis in speech production: an overview and a comparison to other nonlinear methods. J. Speech Lang. Hearing Res. 57, 743–757 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  100. Lancia, L., Tiede, M.: A survey of methods for the analysis of the temporal evolution of speech articulator trajectories. In: Fuchs, A., et al. (eds.) Speech Planning and Dynamics, Peter Lang (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  101. Schinkel, S., et al.: Confidence bounds of recurrence-based complexity measures. Phys. Lett. A 373(26), 2245–2250 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Danish Council for Independent Research—Humanities & Technology and Production Sciences, the Interacting Minds Center (Aarhus University), the ERC Marie Curie Training Network Towards an Embodied Science of Intersubjectivity (TESIS) and the EUROCORES project: Digging the Roots For Understanding (DRUST).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo Fusaroli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fusaroli, R., Konvalinka, I., Wallot, S. (2014). Analyzing Social Interactions: The Promises and Challenges of Using Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis. In: Marwan, N., Riley, M., Giuliani, A., Webber, Jr., C. (eds) Translational Recurrences. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09531-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics