Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Advances in Knowledge Management pp 25–44Cite as

Knowledge Management Concepts and Models

Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM,volume 1)

Abstract

This chapter reviews some of the most important and useful concepts and models developed in or for KM. The review is organised on the basis of a model of KM as the interplay between people, processes and technology, supported by organizational structures. This stems from a philosophy that the people and technological aspects of KM always need to be balanced appropriately. Adding the content of the knowledge to this model yields the five sub-sections of the chapter. Content aspects cover tacit and explicit knowledge and the SECI model. Process aspects include KM maturity models and absorptive capacity. People aspects highlight Communities of Practice, sticky knowledge, storytelling, cognitive maps and social network analysis. Structural and strategic aspects include exploration/exploitation, personalization/codification, alignment with business strategy and ba. Technological aspects feature ontologies. The chapter concludes that the main challenge for the future is to develop KM models that incorporate enough complexity to be effective, while remaining simple enough that people who are not KM experts can use them.

Keywords

  • Knowledge Management
  • Knowledge Transfer
  • Tacit Knowledge
  • Absorptive Capacity
  • Social Network Analysis

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alavi, M., & Kane, G. C. (2008). Social networks and information technology: Evolution and new frontiers. In I. Becerra Fernandez & D. Leidner (Eds.), Knowledge management: An evolutionary review (Advances in management information systems, Vol. 12, pp. 63–85). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS Quarterly, 25(1), 107–136.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, M. B., & Barbosa, R. R. (2009). Ontologies in knowledge management support: A case study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(10), 2032–2047. doi:10.1002/asi.21120.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, T. (1999). The current state of knowledge management. In J. Liebowitz (Ed.), Knowledge management handbook (pp. 1–22). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berends, H. (2005). Exploring knowledge sharing: Moves, problem solving and justification. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 3(2), 97–105.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bolisani, E., & Oltramari, A. (2012). Knowledge as a measurable object in business contexts: A stock-and-flow approach. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(3), 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C., Guillaume, Y. R. F., & Lee, N. J. (2011). Ethnic diversity as a multilevel construct: The combined effects of dissimilarity, group diversity, and societal status on learning performance in work groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(7), 1198–1218.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40–57.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, S., Grinnall, A., & Williams, D. (2013). What have we learned so far? The development and application of an organisational learning narrative. Knowledge Management Research and Practice. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.38.

  • Checkland, P., & Holwell, S. (1998). Information, systems and information systems – Making sense of the field. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coakes, E., & Clarke, S. (Eds.). (2006). Encyclopedia of communities of practice in information and knowledge management. Hershey: Idea Group Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, S. D. N., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2007). Reproducing knowledge: Xerox and the story of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 5(1), 3–12. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500118.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Damodaran, L., & Olphert, W. (2000). Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 19(6), 405–413.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Earl, M. (2001). Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Developing a model for managing intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 356–364.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2001). Knowledge life-cycles: What to keep and what to throw away? In Proceedings of Knowledge Management in O.R. Groups, Farnborough, 16 May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2003). Knowledge engineering: A forgotten element in knowledge management. OR45. Keele University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S. (2009). Business processes and knowledge management. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (2nd ed., Vol. I, pp. 471–476). Hershey: IGI Global.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S., Duan, Y., & Robins, P. C. (2000). An analysis of expert systems for business decision making at different levels and in different roles. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(1), 36–46.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S., Collier, P. M., & Shaw, D. (2005a). Knowledge management and its impact on the management accountant. London: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. S., Shaw, D., & Collier, P. M. (2005b). Knowledge management systems: Finding a way with technology. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 113–125.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ehms, K., & Langen, M. (2002). Holistic development of knowledge management with KMMM. http://www.providersedge.com/docs/km_articles/Holistic_Development_of_KM_with_KMMM.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2013.

  • Garbacz, P., Kulicki, P., & Trypuz, R. (2012). A formal ontology of knowing and knowledge. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 10(3), 206–226. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2012.16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Dunbar, R. L. M., & Bartel, C. A. (2011). Dealing with unusual experiences: A narrative perspective on organizational learning. Organization Science, 22(3), 587–601. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0536.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilova, T., Leshcheva, I., & Strakhovich, E. (2014). Gestalt principles of creating learning business ontologies for knowledge codification. Knowledge Management Research and Practice. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2013.60.

  • Gilsing, V., Nooteboom, B., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G., & van den Oord, A. (2008). Network embeddedness and the exploration of novel technologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density. Research Policy, 37(10), 1717–1731.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gorry, G. A., & Westbrook, R. A. (2012). Customers, knowledge management, and intellectual capital. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(1), 92–97. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2012.14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114–135.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter special issue), 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, T. R. (1995). Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 43(5–6), 907–928.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, T., Schwartz, D. G., Burstein, F., & Linger, H. (2009). Codifying collaborative knowledge: Using Wikipedia as a basis for automated ontology learning. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7(3), 206–217. doi:10.1057/kmrp.2009.14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. T., Nohria, N., & Tierney, T. (1999). What’s your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review, 77(2), 106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, P. (2009). Harmonisation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(4), 4–31.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, P. H. J., & Vriens, D. J. (1999). Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: Friends or foes? Information Management, 35(2), 113–125. doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(98)00080-9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Holsapple, C. W., & Joshi, K. D. (2004). A formal knowledge management ontology: Conduct, activities, resources, and influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(7), 593–612.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Jimenez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2013). Studying the effect of HRM practices on the knowledge management process. Personnel Review, 42(1–2), 28–49. doi:10.1108/00483481311285219.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W. R. (2006). Knowledge sharing. In D. G. Schwartz (Ed.), The encyclopedia of knowledge management (pp. 493–498). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing Ltd.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, J. H. (2008). Some directions for research in knowledge sharing. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6(1), 41–46. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500159.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong, E., & Lee, W. B. (2009). Knowledge elicitation in reliability management in the airline industry. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), 35–48. doi:10.1108/13673270910942682.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. C. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, S. S., & Prietula, M. J. (2012). How knowledge transfer impacts performance: A multilevel model of benefits and liabilities. Organization Science, 23(6), 1748–1766. doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0697.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. (1998). Expert systems – An integral part of knowledge management. Kybernetes, 27(2), 170–175.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. (2005). Linking social network analysis with the analytic hierarchy process for knowledge mapping in organizations. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(1), 76–86.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R. (1999). Why information technology inspired but cannot deliver knowledge management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–117.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, C. (2002). Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1009–1018.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, N., Oswald, S., & Mehta, A. (2007). Infosys technologies: Improving organizational knowledge flows. Journal of Information Technology, 22(4), 456–464. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000115.

  • Mingers, J. (2008). Management knowledge and knowledge management: Realism and forms of truth. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6(1), 62–76. doi:10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The concept of “ba”: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company, how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 1(1), 2–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job (Collection on technology and work). Ithaca: ILR Press/Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulk, M. C., Curtis, B., Chrissis, M. B., & Weber, C. V. (1993). Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, 10(4), 18–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, T. H., & Ambrosini, V. (2012). A pluralistic approach to knowledge management practices: Evidence from consultancy companies. Long Range Planning, 45(2–3), 209–226. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.02.005.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, L., Reichgelt, H., & Osei-Bryson, K.-M. (2009). An approach for ontology development and assessment using a quality framework. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7(3), 260–276.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ribière, V., & Walter, C. (2013). 10 years of KM theory and practices. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(1), 4–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, J., & Von Krogh, G. (1996). The epistemological challenge: Managing knowledge and intellectual capital. European Management Journal, 14(4), 333–337.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Edwards, J. S. (2005). Building user commitment to implementing a knowledge management strategy. Information Management, 42(7), 977–988.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., & Edwards, J. S. (2006). Manufacturing knowledge management strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 44(10), 1907–1925.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D., Edwards, J. S., & Collier, P. M. (2006). Quid pro quo: Reflections on the value of problem structuring workshops. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(8), 939–949.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. A., & McKeen, J. D. (2007). Social networks: KM’s killer app? Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 19(27), 611–621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowden, D. (2000). Cynefin, a sense of time and place: An ecological approach to sense making and learning in formal and informal communities. In J. S. Edwards & J. B. Kidd (Eds.), Proceedings of KMAC2000 (pp. 1–11). Birmingham: Operational Research Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sveiby, K. E. (1997). The new organizational wealth: Managing & measuring knowledge-based assets. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, J., Newell, S., Scarborough, H., & Hislop, D. (1999). Knowledge management and innovation: Networks and networking. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(4), 262–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(Winter special issue), 27–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 9–27. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2884. Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com.

  • Tuomi, I. (1999). Data is more than knowledge: Implications of the reversed knowledge hierarchy for knowledge management and organizational memory. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Spek, R., & Spijkervet, A. (1995). Knowledge management: Dealing intelligently with knowledge. Utrecht: Kenniscentrum CIBIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig, K. M. (1993). Knowledge management foundations: Thinking about thinking – How people and organizations create, represent and use knowledge. Arlington: Schema Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. A. (1996). Managing knowledge. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Operations & Information Management Group, Aston Business School, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK

    John S. Edwards

Authors
  1. John S. Edwards
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John S. Edwards .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Management and Engineering, University of Padua, Vincenza, Italy

    Ettore Bolisani

  2. International Burch University, Sarajevo, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Suleyman Sah University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Meliha Handzic

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edwards, J.S. (2015). Knowledge Management Concepts and Models. In: Bolisani, E., Handzic, M. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09501-1_2

Download citation

search

Navigation