Skip to main content

Encouraging Engineering Students to Question Technological Solutions for Complex Ecological and Social Problems

  • 844 Accesses

Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

Sustainability in the curriculum of engineering students is either ignored or solely focuses on technological solutions. As the UN Rio+20 debate and its focus on Green Economy shows, there is a strong demand for technological innovations as a remedy for ecological destruction and as pathway to poverty eradication. Consequently, the predominant belief in technological progress is held up through technicians as well as a society wishing for easy technological solutions for complex ecological and social problems. Taking this into account, this paper outlines a course design that promotes socially and ecologically responsible engineering through a variety of alternative teaching methods. Engineering students acquire the competence to unveil the complex interdependency of their social, political, ecological and economic surroundings. This includes the consideration of different values, interests and needs within a global perspective as well as within one class(room). The course design encourages democratic decision-making not only to solve but also to define problems within the course itself and moreover outside of the classroom. This method is applied in order to adequately respond to the specific needs of users and to cooperatively develop technologies which are socially useful, locally adapted, durable, repairable and recyclable.

Keywords

  • Engineering education
  • Sustainable development
  • Green economy
  • Democracy
  • Society nature relations

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09474-8_27
  • Chapter length: 12 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-09474-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Baier A (2013) Student-driven courses on the social and ecological responsibilities of engineers. Sci Eng Ethics 19(4):1469–1472

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Baier A, Pongratz S (2013) Collectively and critically reflecting on technology and society. In: Proceedings of the 41st SEFI annual conference, Leuven, Belgium, 16–20 Sept 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker E, Jahn T (2005) Societal relations to nature. Outline of a critical theory in the ecological crisis. In: Böhme G, Manzei A (eds.) (2003). Kritische Theorie der Technik und der Natur. Fink, München, pp 91–112. http://www.isoe.de/ftp/darmstadttext_engl.pdf. Last accessed 16 March 2014

  • Blue Engineering (2011) Blue Engineering Baukasten. Ein Handbuch. http://www.blue-engineering.org/baukasten.pdf. Last accessed 24 March 2014

  • Blue Engineering (2014) Blue engineering website. http://www.blue-engineering.org. Last accessed 24 March 2014

  • Boni A, Pérez-Foguet A (2008) Introducing development education in technical universities: successful experiences in Spain. Eur J Eng Educ 33(3):343–354

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brand U (2012) Beautiful green world. On the Myths of a Green Economy. Luxemburg Argumente 2, 3, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand U (2014) Growth and domination. Shortcomings of the (De-) Growth Debate. Forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand U, Wissen M (2013) Crisis and continuity of capitalist society-nature relationships: the imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance. Rev Int Polit Econ 20(4):687–711

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brey P (2009) Converging technologies and ethics of the good life. In: Proceedings of the 16th international conference of the society for philosophy and technology, Enschede, Netherlands, 8–10 July 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber A, Haas T (2012) Rio+20: Die Grüne Beliebigkeit. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 2(2012):15–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Conlon E (2008) The new engineer: between employability and social responsibility. Eur J Eng Educ 33(2):151–159

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Demirović A (1997) Demokratie und Herrschaft. Aspekte kritischer Gesellschaftstheorie. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirović A (2007) Demokratie in der Wirtschaft. Positionen, Probleme, Perspektiven. Westfälisches Dampfboot, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Demirović A (2012) Marx Grün. Die gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnisse demokratisieren. Luxemburg, 3, 2012, VSA, Hamburg, pp 60–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Deppe F (2009) Kapitalismus und Demokratie? Reflexionen über ein problematisches Verhältnis. Luxemburg, 2, 2009, VSA, Hamburg, pp 39–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz K (2012) Trügerische Hoffnung. Green Economy und ökologische Modernisierung. Rosalux 2, 2012. http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/RosaLux/RosaLux_2-2012.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2014

  • Görg C (2003) Nichtidentität und Kritik. Zum Problem der Gestaltung der Naturverhältnisse. In: Böhme G, Manzei A (eds) Kritische Theorie der Technik und der Natur. München, Fink, pp 113–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald A (2011) Einführung in das Schwerpunktthema. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (ed.), TAB-Brief Nr. 39, Berlin, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra A (2012) What are the common knowledge and competencies for education for sustainable development and for engineering education for sustainable development? In: Proceedings of the 40th SEFI annual conference, Thessaloniki, Greece, 23–26 Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Hald M (ed) (2011) Transcending boundaries. How Cemus is changing how we teach, meet and learn. Cemus/CSD Uppsala, Uppsala University and Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences. http://www.cemus.uu.se/openuniversity/PUBLICATIONS/BOOK.transcending.bounderies.CEMUS.pdf. Last accessed 24 March 2014

  • Horkheimer M, Adorno TW (2002) Dialectic of enlightenment. Philosophical fragments. Stanford University Press, Standford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn T, Wehling P (1998) Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse—Konturen eines theoretischen Konzepts. In: Brand KW (ed) Soziologie und Natur. Theoretische Perspektiven. Leske+Budrich, Opladen, pp 75–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastenhofer K, Lansu A, van Dam-Mieras R, Sotoudeh M (2010) The contribution of university curricula to engineering education for sustainable development. GAIA 19(1):44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler B, Wissen M (2010) Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse. Ein kritischer theoretischer Zugang zur ökologischen Krise. In: Lösch B (ed) Kritische politische Bildung. Ein Handbuch. Reihe Politik und Bildung, 54, Wochenschau-Verlag, Schwalbach/Ts, pp 217–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Krätke M (2003) Wirtschaftsdemokratie und Marktsozialismus. Kritische Interventionen 8, Hannover, p 58

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock J (2010) On the Value of Sceptics and Why Copenhagen Was Doomed. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2010/mar/29/james-lovelock. Last accessed in 24 March 2014

  • Maroshek-Klarman U, Ulrich S (1997) “Miteinander—Erfahrungen mit Betzavta. Ein Praxishandbuch auf der Grundlage des Werks «Miteinander» von Uki Maroshek-Klarman, Adam-Institut, Jerusalem. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh

    Google Scholar 

  • Maroshek-Klarman U, Vaddai D (1993) There is no such thing as some democracy. On educating towards democracy and on democracy in the educational system. Kinneret Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel J (2008) Editorial. A new issue devoted to sustainable development. Eur J Eng Educ 33(3):245–246

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ropohl G (2000) Demokratische Technikgestaltung braucht konzeptionelle Konvergenz. Büro für Technikfolgen-Abschätzung beim Deutschen Bundestag (ed.), TAB-Brief Nr. 18, Berlin, p 40

    Google Scholar 

  • Santarius T (2012) Green growth unraveled. How rebound effects baffle sustainability targets when the economy keeps growing. Heinrich Boell Foundation, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmiade B, Becker F (2008) Branchenreport Windenergiewirtschaft Europa. Arbeitsorientierte Fragestellungen und Handlungsmöglichkeiten. Hans-Böckler-Stiftung and IG Metall Vorstand (eds), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Segalàs D, Ferrer-Balas D, Mulder KF (2008) Conceputal maps: measuring learning processes of engineering students concerning sustainable development. Eur J Eng Educ 33(3):297–306

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland M (2013) Using student engagement to relocate ethics to the core of the engineering curriculum. Sci Eng Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9444-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt (ed) (2009) Report on the environmental economy 2009. Facts and figures for Germany. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/report-on-environmental-economy-2009. Last accessed 21 March 2014

  • UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. United Nations Environment Programme. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/ger_final_dec_2011/Green%20EconomyReport_Final_Dec2011.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2014

  • Wissen M (2012) Von Rio nach Rio. Sackgassen internationaler Umweltpolitik: Von 1992 bis 2012. Rosalux 2, 2012. http://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/RosaLux/RosaLux_2-2012.pdf. Last accessed 11 March 2014

  • Zandvoort H (2008) Preparing engineers for social responsibility. Eur J Eng Educ 33(2):133–140

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Baier .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pongratz, S., Baier, A. (2015). Encouraging Engineering Students to Question Technological Solutions for Complex Ecological and Social Problems. In: Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Caeiro, S., Alves, F. (eds) Integrating Sustainability Thinking in Science and Engineering Curricula. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09474-8_27

Download citation