Abstract
The main objective of this work was to develop a methodology for optimising the hood assembly for minimal deformation with robust and homogeneous impact behaviour in a pedestrian head impact. In practice, the design of the outer and inner hood panels must meet all general design requirements in addition to pedestrian head impact performance.
This study utilised Computer Aided Engineering (CAE) simulation tools to investigate the optimal solution for hood panels with consideration to material, panel thickness and geometry of inner hood.
Findings from this study showed that efficiency can be improved with optimal combined thickness of inner and outer hood panels. However, similar efficiencies were achieved for various combinations of thinner inner and thicker outer hood panels.
An optimal pedestrian head impact performance can be achieved with the following design parameters for aluminium hood panels: multi-cone structure for inner hood, and approximately 2.1 mm combined thickness with thinner inner and thicker outer hood combination.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
A2Mac1 (2010) Automotive benchmarking, viewed 22 March 2010. http://a2mac1.com/home
Bohling G (2005) Kriging, University of Kansas, viewed 28 July 2011. http://people.ku.edu/~gbohling/cpe940/Kriging.pdf
Centre of automotive safety research (2007) Head impact test machine, The University of Adelaide, viewed 17 December 2009. http://casr.adelaide.edu.au/impact.html
Elert G (2001) Number of cars, Glenn Elert, viewed 16 June 2010. http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/MarinaStasenko.shtml
European Commission (2010) Road safety, viewed 13 February 2010. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/road_safety/specialist/statistics/trends
Gelman A (2004) Analysis of variance-why it is more important than ever, Columbia University, viewed 28 July 2011. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/research/published/banova7.pdf
Hardy BJ, Lawrence GJL, Knight IM, Simmons ICP, Carroll JA, Coley G, Bartlett RS (2007) A study of possible future developments of methods to protect pedestrians and other vulnerable road users, UPR/VE/061/07, TRL Limited
Honda Worldwide (2008) Honda to begin using third generation pedestrian dummy in crash tests to enable evaluation of injuries to the lower back and upper leg, viewed 17 December 2009. http://world.honda.com/news/2008/4080918POLAR-III/
Kam CY, Kerrigan J, Meissner M, Drinkwater C, Murphy D, Bolton J, Arregui C, Kendall R, Ivarsson J, Crandall J, Deng B, Wang JT, Kerkeling C, Hahn W (2005) Design of a full-scale impact system for analysis of vehicle pedestrian collisions, SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1875, SAE World Congress, Detroit, Michigan, SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA
Krishnamoorthy R, Takla M, Subic A, Scott D (2013) Design optimisation of passenger car hood panels for improved pedestrian protection. Adv Mater Res 633:62–76
Lim GG, Chou CC, Patel RN, Shahab SA, Patel PJ (1995) Estimating the minimum space to meet federal interior head impact requirement, SAE Technical Paper 950333, SAE International Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, SAE International, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, USA
Mizuno Y (2003) Summary of IHRA pedestrian safety WG activities (2003) – proposed test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection offered by passenger cars
Narasimhan B (1996) The normal distribution, Stanford University, viewed 28 July 2011. http://www-stat.stanford.edu/~naras/jsm/NormalDensity/NormalDensity.html
National highway traffic safety administration (2009) viewed 10 October 2011. http://www-fars.nhtsa.dot.gov/People/PeoplePedestrians.aspx
Ryan GA, McLean AJ (1965) Pedestrian survival. Safe car guide 2009, Australian New Car Assessment Program, viewed 25 November 2009, http://www.safecarguide.com/exp/ancap/ancap.htm
Synaptic analysis consulting group inc viewed 23 February (2011). http://www.synapacg.com/casestudies_pedestrian.html
Transport Research Laboratory (2012) Pedestrian Safety, Transport Research Laboratory, viewed 15 October 2012. http://www.trl.co.uk/research_development/improving_safety/user_safety/pedestrian_safety.htm
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1998) Global technical regulation No. 9 (Pedestrian safety), United Nations viewed 12 July 2011. http://live.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/wp29registry/gtr9.html
World Health Organization (2010) Global status report on road safety: time for action, World Health Organization, viewed 12 August 2010. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/2009
World Health Organization (2011) Violence and injury prevention and disability, World Health Organization, viewed 10 October 2011. http://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/road_safety_status/multimedia/pictures/en/index.html
Worldometers (2010) World statistics updated in real time, Worldometers, viewed 15 July 2011. http://www.worldometers.info/cars/
Wu J, Beaudet B (2007) Optimization of head impact waveform to minimize HIC. World Congress
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krishnamoorthy, R., Takla, M., Subic, A., Scott, D. (2015). Optimization of Hood Design to Minimise Pedestrian Head Injury in Impact. In: Dai, L., Jazar, R. (eds) Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09462-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09462-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09461-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09462-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)