Skip to main content

A Strategic and Organizational Perspective for Understanding the Evolution of Online Reputation Management Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
From Information to Smart Society

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 5))

Abstract

Online Corporate Reputation is a strategic but quickly damageable resource for firms and requires a fast detection of possible threats as well as proactive interventions. Through a longitudinal case-study, our aim is to depict the evolution of Online Reputation Management Systems, i.e. IS for online CR management, as an interplay among developments of technology, organizational needs and strategic postures. Some research propositions for future works are proposed as well as some methods and good practices for online CR management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Starting with about 50 projects on online CR management in 2010, currently RepMan has 254 projects with important clients in sectors such as finance, telecommunications, media, pharmaceutical, automotive, food, and fashion. Most of them are large multinational firms that ask for cross-national analyses, though there are also start-ups that want to evaluate new business opportunities, as well as professionals, CEOs, politicians, and public figures that ask for managing their personal reputation. The number of employees has dramatically increased in the last 3 years, from 10 to up to 25 units.

  2. 2.

    For example, the Social CRM and the Engagement services require a close coordination among RepMan’s analysts and consultants and the customers’ units such as Marketing, Customer Care, PR and so forth.

  3. 3.

    An agreement between RepMan and the major newspaper allows accurate press reviews.

References

  1. Alsop, R.J.: Corporate reputation – anything but superficial: the deep but fragile nature of corporate reputation. J. Bus. Strategy. 25(6), 21–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fombrun, C.J., van Riel, C.B.M.: The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputat. Rev. 1, 5–13 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonini, S., Court, D., Marchi, A.: Rebuilding corporate reputations. McKinsey Q. 3, 75–83 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Manovich, L.: Trending: the promises and the challenges of big social data. In: Gold, M.K. (ed.) Debates in the Digital Humanities. The University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyd, D., Crawford, K.: Six provocations for big data a decade in internet time: symposium on the dynamics of the internet and society. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1926431 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1926431 (2011). Accessed 21 Sept 2011

  6. Boisot, M.: Information Space: A Framework for Learning in Organizations, Institutions and Culture. Routledge, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGrath, K.: Affection not affliction: the role of emotions in information systems and organizational change. Inf. Org. 16(4), 277–303 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Francesconi, A., Dossena, C.: IS and organization for online corporate reputation management. Int. J. E-Serv. Mob. Appl. 4(2), 1–18 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Piccoli, G.: Information Systems for Managers: Texts and Cases Crawfordsville. Wiley, Crawfordsville (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Davis, G.B.: Information systems conceptual foundations: looking backward and forward. In: Baskerville, R., Stage, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Organizational and Social Perspectives on Information Technology, pp. 61–82. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 448–469 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rindova, V.P., Williamson, I.O., Petkova, A.P., Sever, J.M.: Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Acad. Manage. J. 48(6), 1033–1049 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hutton, J.G., Goodman, M.B., Alexander, J.B., Genest, C.M.: Reputation management: the new face of corporate public relations. Public. Relat. Rev. 27, 249 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masum, H., Tovey, M., Newmark, C.: The Reputation Society: How Online Opinions are Reshaping the Offline World. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bonini, S., Court, D., Marchi, A.: Rebuilding corporate reputations. McKinsey Q. 3, 75–83 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Clark, A.: They’re talking about you: some thoughts about managing online commentary affecting corporate reputation. J. Commun. Manag. 5(3), 262–276 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bennett, R., Martin, C.L.: Corporate reputation: what to do about online attacks: step no.1: stop ignoring them. Wall Street J. R6 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gonzalez-Herrero, A., Smith, S.: Crisis communications management on the web: how Internet-based technologies are changing the way public relations professionals handle business crisis. J. Conting. Cris. Manag. 16(3), 143–153 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bernhardt, A., Conway, T., Lewis, G., Ward, M.: Internet crisis potential: the importance of a strategic approach to marketing communications. J. Mark. Commun. 13(3), 213–228 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bornemann, D., Hansen, U., Rezabakhsh, B., Schrader, U.: Consumer power: a comparison of the old economy and the internet economy. J. Consumer Policy 29(3), 3–36 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bunting, M., Lipski, R.: Drowned out? corporate reputation management for the Internet. J. Commun. Manag. 5(2), 170–178 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gorry, G.A., Westbrook, R.A.: Winning the internet confidence game. Corp. Reputat. Rev. 12(3), 195–203 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chun, R., da Silva, R.V., Davies, G., Roper, S.: Scale to assess employee and customer views of organization reputation. Corp. Reputat. Rev. 7(2), 125–146 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chesbrough, H., Crowther, A.K.: Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R&D Manag. 36(3), 229–236 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. von Hippel, E.: Horizontal innovation networks: by and for users, working paper 4366-02, MIT Sloan School of Management (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Francesconi, A., Bonazzi, R., Dossena, C.: Online communities and open innovation. The solar system metaphor. Int. J. E-Serv. Mob. Appl. 5(4), 25–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cilliers, B., Grobler, A., Steyn, B.: A theoretical framework for the concept of ‘Internet strategy’. Communicare 24(1), 20–48 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Einwiller, S., Will, M.: The role of reputation to engender trust in electronic markets. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Corporate Reputation, Identity, and Competitiveness, Paris, France (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miles, M.P., Munilla, L.S., Darroch, J.: The role of strategic conversations with stakeholders in the formation of corporate social responsibility strategy. J. Bus. Ethics. 69, 195–205 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sharma, S.: Through the lens of managerial interpretation: stakeholder engagement, organizational knowledge and innovation. In: Sharma, S., Aragón-Correa, J.A. (eds.) Corporate Environmental Strategy and Competitive Advantage: New Perspectives in Research on Corporate Sustainability, pp. 49–70. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham and Northampton (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Parmer, B.L., de Colle, S.: Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C.: Managing for Stakeholders: Survival, Reputation, and Success. Yale University Press, New Haven (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Noland, J., Phillips, R.: Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12(1), 39–49 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Katsoulakos, T., Katsoulacos, Y.: Integrating corporate responsibility principles and stakeholder approaches into mainstream strategy: a stakeholder-oriented and integrative strategic management framework. Corp. Gov. 7(4), 355–369 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nelson, J., Zadek, S.: Partnership Alchemy: New Social Partnerships in Europe. The Copenhagen Centre, Copenhagen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gould, W.R.: Open innovation and stakeholder engagement. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 7(3), 1–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonsón, E., Ratkai, M.: A set of metrics to assess stakeholder engagement and social legitimacy on a corporate Facebook page. Online Inf. Rev. 37(5), 787–803 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kitchen, P.J., Laurence, A.: Corporate reputation: an eight-country analysis. Corp. Reputat. Rev. 6(2), 103–117 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lee, A.S., Baskerville, R.: Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Inf. Syst. Res. 14(3), 221–243 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. In: Applied Social Research Series, vol. 5, Sage Publications, London (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kimberly, J.R.: Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: a review, critique and proposal. Adm. Sci. Q. 21(4), 571–597 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Bostrom, P.R., Heinen, J.S.: MIS problems and failures: a socio-technical perspective part I: the causes. MIS Q. 1(1), 17–32 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Piccoli, G.: Information Systems for Managers: Texts and Cases. Wiley Publishing, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Dahlander, L., Wallin, M.W.: A man on the inside: unlocking communities as complementary assets. Res. Policy 35, 1243–1259 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Noland, J., Phillips, R.: Stakeholder engagement, discourse ethics and strategic management. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 12(1), 39–49 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Francesconi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Francesconi, A., Dossena, C. (2015). A Strategic and Organizational Perspective for Understanding the Evolution of Online Reputation Management Systems. In: Mola, L., Pennarola, F., Za, S. (eds) From Information to Smart Society. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09450-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics