Skip to main content

Revisiting Gujarat: Is There a Capability Trap?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 929 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environmental Hazards ((ENHA))

Abstract

This chapter applies the Perception Driven Joint Learning Approach (PeDJoLA) model of capacity development to understand Gujarat’s post-2011 earthquake capacity building process. The chapter focuses on understanding capacity building efforts from two levels: top-down level, within different levels of governments, and bottom-up level, within different community groups. Sustainability of capacity development efforts is also discussed along with challenges that inhibit developing effective capacity. The chapter presents findings from field research carried out in 2012, through interviews, surveys, and review of documents. A methodology to apply the conceptual model through field research is discussed first. The second section describes the perception of research participants regarding capacity deficit and disaster risk. The third section describes different forms of capacity development efforts undertaken by different stakeholders, including the government and the community. The fourth section looks into whether capacity development under the Gujarat Emergency Earthquake Reconstruction Project (GEERP) has taken place or not, focusing on changes in the local government and the community. The fifth section explores how sustainable the current capacity development efforts are, in terms of learning and empowerment. The final section, which relies heavily on formal and informal interviews, highlights the potential factors responsible for inhibiting capacity development in the three study towns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Where earthquakes of magnitude 8 on Richter scale can be expected.

  2. 2.

    The transfer of knowledge on best practices in construction proved effective at sustaining and improving the application of seismic resistance techniques during the reconstruction process. However, field assessments suggest that some of these best practices have subsequently been ignored, particularly in rural areas, due to the waning institutional intermediation (World Bank 2009).

  3. 3.

    The index, normalized for baseline values to 1, is based on the following indicators: access to house/permanent house, size of house, and basic amenities in house—separate kitchen and toilet; access to primary school, basic amenities in primary school; access to functional health facility; access to surfaced road; adequate drinking water; access to piped water supply/public stand post; and access to electricity. The surveys were largely conducted in rural areas.

References

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asian Development Bank. (2008). India: Gujarat earthquake rehabilitation and reconstruction implementation completion report. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • BHADA. (2011). Presentation on development of Bhuj after earthquake. Unpublished presentation. Bhuj, Gujarat: Bhuj Area Development Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardona, O. D. (2003). The need for rethinking the concepts of vulnerability and risk from a holistic perspective: A necessary review and criticism for effective risk management. In G. Frerks, G. Bankoff, & D. Hilhorst (Eds.), Mapping vulnerability: Disasters, development, and people. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census of India. (2011). Bhuj city census 2011 data. http://www.census2011.co.in/census/city/317-bhuj.html. Accessed Dec 2012.

  • CEPT University. (2009). Social impact assessment for the post-earthquake program. Gandhinagar: GSDMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPT University. (2012). Performance assessment system. Available at www.pas.org.in. Accessed on 10th Dec 2012.

  • Drabek, T. E. (2005). Sociology, disasters and emergency management: History, contributions, and future agenda. In D. A. McEntire (Ed.), Disciplines, disasters and emergency management: The convergence and divergence of concepts, issues and trends in the research literature. Emmitsburg: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erramilli, B. P. (2009). Disaster management in India: Analysis of factors impacting capacity building. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Georgia State University, UMI Number: 3406051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazette of India. (2005). The disaster management act. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C., & Woolcock, M. (2005). Empowerment and local level conflict mediation in Indonesia: A comparative analysis of concepts, measures, and project efficacy. Policy Research Working Paper No. 3713. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Gujarat. (2001). A preliminary report on the earthquake damage in Gujarat. Gujarat: Government of Gujarat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2004). Annual report 2003–2004. New Delhi: Ministry of Home Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2005). Report of the Administrative Reforms Commission. New Delhi: Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances, and Pensions. http://arc.gov.in/index.htm. Accessed on 10 Aug 2012.

  • Government of India. (2007). The Constitution of India. New Delhi: Ministry of Law and Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindle, M. (1996). Challenging the state: Crisis and innovation in Latin America and Africa. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • GSDMA. (2012). Hazard profiles. Available at http://www.gsdma.org/hazard.jpg. Accessed on 10th Dec 2012.

  • Jigyasu, R. (2002a). Reducing disaster vulnerability through local knowledge and capacity: The case of earthquake-prone rural communities in India and Nepal. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jigyasu, R. (2002b). From Marathwada to Gujarat. Emerging challenges in post-earthquake rehabilitation for sustainable eco-development in South Asia. Proceedings of the conference Improving Post-disaster Reconstruction in Developing Countries. University of Montreal, Montreal, May 23rd–25th, 2002. Available at www.grif.umontreal.ca/pages/i-rec%20papers/rohit.PDF. Accessed on 16th Sept 2012.

  • Katiyar, S. K., & Khandelwal, R. (2001). Relocation in Kutch: Bridging old fault lines. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(26), 2319–2321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, C. (2009). Why do people die in earthquakes? The costs, benefits and institutions of disaster risk reduction in developing countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4823. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2005). Benefit monitoring consulting sample survey report. Unpublished power point presentation, KPMG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, L. (2001). The manufacture of popular perceptions of scarcity: Dams and water-related narratives in Gujarat, India. World Development, 29(12), 2025–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa, Y., & Shaw, R. (2004). Social capital: A missing link to disaster recovery. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 22(1), 5–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • NDMA. (2007). National disaster management guidelines: Management of earthquakes. New Delhi: National Disaster Management Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchett, L., & Weijer, F. (2010). Fragile states: Stuck in a capability trap? Input paper for The World Development Report 2011. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raju, K. C. B. (1995). Strategies to combat drought in Kutch. Workshop on strengthening of community participation in disaster reduction and role of NGOs, January 13–15, New Delhi/Mandvi: Vivekananda Research and Training Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, D., & Sharma, A. (2008). Winners and losers from the 2001 Gujarat earthquake. Environment and Urbanization, 20(1), 177–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sato, T., Hamada, M., & Hayashi, Y., et al. (2001). A comprehensive survey of the 26 January 2001 earthquake (Mw 7.7) in the State of Gujarat, India. Report by the Research Team supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research Provided by the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology in the fiscal year of 2000. Available at http://www.st.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/~tamao/Gujaratprint.html. Accessed on 13th Dec 2012.

  • Sharma, M. B. (2009). Disaster as an opportunity for development of social impact assessment of Gujarat Earthquake Emergency Reconstruction Project (GEERP). National Seminar on Housing and Disaster Mitigation Efforts in India: Case Studies. Available at http://bhagirathi.iitr.ac.in/dspace/bitstream/123456789/936/1/2%20Madhu%20Bharti.pdf. Accessed on 10th Nov 2012.

  • Sheth, P. N. (2000). Gujarat. In G. Mathew (Ed.), Status of Panchayati Raj in the States and Union Territories of India 2000. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company for Institute of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. (2008). The rise and fall of collective public action in the aftermath of the Gujarat earthquake of 2001. NGPA Working Paper Series. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiruppugazh, V. (2007). Post-disaster reconstruction and the window of opportunity: A review of select concepts, models and research studies. JTCDM Working Paper Series No. 3. Mumbai: Jamsetji Tata Centre for Disaster Management, Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT. (2009). Land and natural disasters: Guidance for practitioners. Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2004). Living with risk: A global review of disaster reduction initiatives. Geneva: United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2009). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNISDR. (2011). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction. Geneva: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2005). Capacity building in Africa: An OED evaluation of World Bank support. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2009). Implementation completion and results report on Gujarat Emergency Earthquake Reconstruction Project. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). Natural hazards, unnatural disasters: The economics of effective prevention. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yagnik, A., & Sud, N. (2005). Hindutva and beyond: The political topography of Gujarat. London: LSE Crisis States Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tiwari, A. (2015). Revisiting Gujarat: Is There a Capability Trap?. In: The Capacity Crisis in Disaster Risk Management. Environmental Hazards. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09405-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics