Accountability v. “Smart Amnesty” in the Transitional Post-conflict Quest for Peace. A South African Case Study

Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Transitional Justice book series (SSTJ, volume 4)

Abstract

The concept of amnesties introduced by States today in the period of transition from conflict to democracy is much more complex, flexible and nuanced, often accompanied by transitional justice mechanisms, which can work to meet the needs of justice where formal prosecution is not possible. Conditional or “smart” amnesties meet the calls for truth, peace and justice and do not contradict the general obligation of the States under treaty or customary law to prosecute gross violations of international crimes. The example of South African amnesty model represents a remarkable innovation in contrast to previous amnesties around the world. While being an exception to a norm requiring accountability for international crimes, “smart” amnesties, reviewed on example of South African model, tailored to the post-conflict transitional society, may in fact better contribute to the establishment of peace and reconciliation in the country, serve the purposes of truth telling and better address the needs of the victims in post-conflict period.

Keywords

Amnesty Conditional amnesty South African amnesty model Reconciliation Truth Transitional justice mechanisms 

Bibliography

  1. Abrahamsen, Therese and Merwe, Hugo van der. “Reconciliation through Amnesty? Amnesty Applicants’ Views of the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” Research report written for the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation, 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Bassiouni, Cherif M. “The Need for International Accountability.” In International Criminal Law, Volume III Enforcement, edited by Cherif Bassiouni, 3–29. New York: Transnational Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
  3. Bassiouni, Cherif M. “Introduction.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996): 5–7.Google Scholar
  4. Bohler-Muller,Narnia. “Against Forgetting: Reconciliation and Reparations After the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” Stellenbosch Law Review 19 (2008): 466–482.Google Scholar
  5. Cassel, Douglas. “Lessons from the Americas: guidelines for international response to amnesties for atrocities.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996): 197–231.Google Scholar
  6. Cassese, Antonio. “The Special Court and international law: the Decision concerning the Lomé Agreement Amnesty.” Journal of International Criminal Justice 2 (2004): 1130–1140.Google Scholar
  7. Chigara, Ben. Amnesty in International Law: The Legality under International Law of National Amnesty Laws. UK: Longman, Harlow, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. Crocker, David A. “Reckoning with Past Wrongs: A Normative Framework.” Ethics & International Affairs 13 (1999): 43–64.Google Scholar
  9. Daly, Erin and Sarkin, Jeremy. Reconciliation in Divided Societies: Finding Common Ground. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Daly, Erin. “Transformative Justice: Charting a Path to Reconciliation.” International Legal Perspective 12 (2001): 73–183.Google Scholar
  11. Dhar, Pamposh. “East Timor: Rebuilding a Country.” Asian Development Bank Review 4 (2002): 4–11.Google Scholar
  12. Dressler, Joshua. Cases and Materials on Criminal Law. Eagan: West Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
  13. Dugard, John. “Dealing with crimes of a past regime. Is amnesty still an option?” Leiden Journal of International Law 12 (1999): 1001–1015.Google Scholar
  14. Fields, Shawn. “Private Crimes and Public Forgiveness: Towards a Refined Restorative Justice Amnesty Regime.” International Journal of Civil Society Law 5 (2007): 7–22.Google Scholar
  15. Fletcher, Laurel E. and Weinstein, Harvey M. “Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation.” Human Rights Quarterly 24 (2002): 573–649.Google Scholar
  16. Fullard, Madeleine and Rousseau, Nicky. “Truth, Evidence and History: A Critical Review of Aspects of the Amnesty Process.” In The Provocations of Amnesty: Memory, Justice, and Impunity, edited by Erik Doxtader and Charles Villa-Vicencio, 195–217. Claremont: David Philip Publishers, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Garkawe, Samuel. “The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission: A Suitable Model to Enhance the Role and Rights of the Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights?” Melbourne University Law Review 27 (2003): 334–380.Google Scholar
  18. Gavron, J. “Amnesties in the Light of Developments in International Law and the Establishment of the International Criminal Court.” International and Comparative Law Quarterly 51 (2002): 91–117.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstone, Richard and Fritz, Nicol. “In the interests of justice and independent referral: the ICC Prosecutor’s unprecedented powers.” Leiden Journal of International Law 13 (2000): 655–667.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstone, Richard. “1998 Otto L. Walter Lecture: International Human Rights at Century’s End.” New York International Law Review, 15 (1999).Google Scholar
  21. Graybill, Lyn S. and Lanegran, Kimberly. “Truth, Justice, and Reconciliation in Africa: Issues and Cases.” African Studies Quarterly 8 (2004): 1–18.Google Scholar
  22. Hadden, Tom. “Punishment, Amnesty and Truth: Legal and Political Approaches.” In Democracy and Ethnic Conflict: Advancing Peace in Deeply Divided Societies, edited by Adrian Guelke, 196–217. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Hayner, Priscilla. Unspeakable Truth: Confronting State Terror and Atrocity. UK: Routledge Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Helnick, Raymond G. and Petersen, Rodney Lawrence. Forgiveness and Reconciliation: Religion, Public Policy and Conflict Transformation. Templeton Foundation Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  25. Kai, Ambos. “The Legal Framework of Transitional Justice.” Study prepared for the International Conference ‘Building a Future on Peace and Justice’, Nuremberg, 25–27 June 2007. Last accessed July 17, 2013. http://www.peace-justice-conference.info/documents.asp.
  26. Kamali, Maryam. “Violations: A Comparison of Transitional Justice in East Germany and South Africa.” Columbia Journal of Transitional Justice 40 (2001): 89–141.Google Scholar
  27. Lansing Paul and King, Julie C. “South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: The Conflict Between Individual Justice and National Healing in the Post-Apartheid Age.” Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 15 (1998): 753–789.Google Scholar
  28. Laplante, Lisa J. “Outlawing Amnesty: The Return of Criminal Justice in Transitional Justice Schemes.” Virginia Journal of International Law 49 (2009): 915–984.Google Scholar
  29. Lauterpacht, H. “The Law of Nations and the Punishment of War Criminals,” British Yearbook of International Law 21 (1944): 58–95.Google Scholar
  30. Llewellyn, Jennifer J. and Howse, Robert. “Institutions for Restorative Justice: The South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” University of Toronto Law Journal 49 (1999): 355–388.Google Scholar
  31. Louise Mallinder. “Exploring the practice of States in introducing amnesties.” Study submitted for the International Conference ‘Building a Future on Peace and Justice’, Nuremberg, 25–27 June 2007. Last accessed July 17, 2013. http://www.peace-justice-conference.info/download/WS4-Mallinder_NurembergStudy_070502.pdf.
  32. Ludwin King, Elizabeth B. “Amnesties in a Time of Transition.” George Washington International Law Review 41 (2009–2010): 577–618.Google Scholar
  33. Mallinder, Louise. “Indemnity, Amnesty, Pardon and Prosecution Guidelines in South Africa.” Working paper No 2, from Beyond Legalism: Amnesties, Transition and Conflict Transformation, Institute of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Queen’s University, Belfast, February 2009.Google Scholar
  34. Mamdani, Mahmood. “Amnesty or Impunity? A Preliminary Critique of the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa,” Diacritics 32 (2002): 32–59.Google Scholar
  35. Mamdani, Mahmood. When does Reconciliation turn into a Denial of Justice? Pretoria: HSRC Publishers, 1998.Google Scholar
  36. McCarthy, Emily H. “South Africa’s Amnesty Process: A Viable Route Toward Truth and Reconciliation?” Michigan Journal of Race and Law 3 (1997): 183–249.Google Scholar
  37. Mendez, Juan. “National Reconciliation, Transnational Justice, and the International Criminal Court.” Ethics & International Affairs 15 (2001): 25–44.Google Scholar
  38. Meyer, Frank. “Complementing complementarity.” International Criminal Law Review 6 (2006): 549–583.Google Scholar
  39. Minow, Martha. Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence. Boston: Beacon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  40. Motala, Ziyad. “The Use of the Truth Commission in South Afiica as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism Versus the International Law Obligations.” Santa Clara Law Review 45 (2005): 913–936.Google Scholar
  41. Nathan, Laurie. “Accounting for South Africa’s Successful Transition to Democracy.” Crisis States Discussion Paper no. 5, 2004.Google Scholar
  42. O’Shea, Andreas. Amnesty for Crime in International Law and Practice. Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002.Google Scholar
  43. Olson, Laura. “Provoking the Dragon on the Patio. Matters of Transitional Justice: Penal Repression v. Amnesties.” International Review of the Red Cross 88 (2006): 275–294.Google Scholar
  44. Orentlicher, Diane. “‘Settling Accounts’ Revisited: Reconciling Global Norms with Local Agency.” International Journal of Transitional Justice 10 (2001): 18.Google Scholar
  45. Orentlicher, Diane. “Settling Accounts: The Duty to Prosecute Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 2539–2615.Google Scholar
  46. Pankhurst, Donna. “Issues of Justice and Reconciliation in Complex Political Emergencies: Conceptualising Reconciliation, Justice and Peace.” Third World Quarterly 20 (1999): 239–256.Google Scholar
  47. Pedain, Antje. “Was Amnesty a Lottery? An Empirical Study of the Decisions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s Committee on Amnesty.” South African Law Journal 121 (2004): 785–828.Google Scholar
  48. Perry, Robin. “The Nature, Status and Future of Amnesties under International Criminal Law.” Australia International Law Journal 8 (2011): 7–104.Google Scholar
  49. Phakathi, Timothy Sizwe and Merwe, Hugo van der. “The Impact of the TRC’s Amnesty Process on Survivors of Human Rights Violations.” In Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC Deliver? edited by Audrey R. Chapman and Hugo van der Merwe, 116–143 Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  50. Pigou, Piers. “False Promises and Wasted Opportunities? Inside South Africa’s A Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” In Commissioning the Past: Understanding South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, edited by Deborah Posel and Graeme Simpson, 37–66. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  51. Reiff, David. “The Precious Triumph of Human Rights,” New York Times, August 8, 1999.Google Scholar
  52. “Report of the Secretary General on the Establishment of a Special Court for Sierra Leone.” October 4, 2000. UN Doc. S/2000/915.Google Scholar
  53. Robinson, D. “Serving the Interests of Justice: Amnesties, Truth Commissions and the International Criminal Court.” EJIL 14 (2003): 481–505.Google Scholar
  54. Sadat, Leila Nadya. “Exile, Amncsty and International Law.” Notre Dame Law Review 81 (2006): 955, 959.Google Scholar
  55. Sarkin, Jeremy. “An Evaluation of the South African Amnesty Process” In Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Did the TRC Deliver? edited by Audrey R. Chapman and Hugo van der Merwe, 93–116. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.Google Scholar
  56. Schabacker, Emily W. “Reconciliation or Justice and Ashes: Amnesty Commissions and the Duty to Punish Human Rights Offenses.” New York International Law Review 1 (1999) 1–54.Google Scholar
  57. Scharf, Michael P. “The Amnesty Exception to the International Criminal Court.” Cornell International Law Journal 32 (1999): 507–527.Google Scholar
  58. Scharf, Michael. “The Letter of the Law: The Scope of the International Legal Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Crimes.” Law and Contemporary Problems 59 (1996): 41–63.Google Scholar
  59. Simpson, Graeme. “‘Tell no Lies, Claim no Easy Victories’: A Brief Evaluation of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission.” In Commissioning the Past: Understanding South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, edited by Deborah Posel and Graeme Simpson, 220–251. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  60. Simpson, Graeme. “A Brief Evaluation of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission: Some lessons for societies in transition.” October 1998. Last accessed on 17 July 2013. http://www.csvr.org.za/index.php/publications/1724-a-brief-evaluation-of-south-africas-truth-and-reconciliation-commission-some-lessons-for-societies-in-transition.html.
  61. Slabbert, Frederick Van Zyl. “Truth without Reconciliation, Reconciliation without Truth” in After TRC: Reflections on Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa, edited Wilmot James and Linda van de Vijver, 62–73. Ohio University Press, (2001).Google Scholar
  62. Slye, Ronald C. “The legitimacy of amnesties under international law and general principles of Anglo-American law: is a legitimate amnesty possible?” Virginia Journal of International Law 43 (2002): 173–247.Google Scholar
  63. Snyder, Jack and Vinjamuri, Leslie. “A Midwife for Peace”, International Herald Tribune, 26 September 2006.Google Scholar
  64. Steiner, Henry, Alston, Philip and Goodman, Ryan. International Human Right in Context: Law, Politics, Morals. Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  65. Swains, Rachel L. “South Africa Urges West to Ease Censure of Zimbabwe.” New York Times, November, 17, 2002.Google Scholar
  66. Teitel, Ruti G. Transitional Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  67. Tepperman, Jonathan D. “Truth and Consequences.” Foreign Affairs, 128 (2002): 128–145.Google Scholar
  68. Trumbull, Charles P. IV. “Giving Amnesties a Second Chance.” Berkeley Journal of International Law, 25 (2007): 283–345.Google Scholar
  69. Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa Report. Last Accessed July 17, 2013. http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/report/.
  70. Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Summary of Amnesty Decisions, 1 November 2000, Last accessed July 17, 2013. http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/amntrans/index.htm.
  71. Tutu, Desmond “What About Justice?” Inaugural Bar Human Rights Committee Lecture at St. Paul’s Cathedral, November 1, 1999.Google Scholar
  72. Tutu, Desmond. No Future Without Forgiveness. Doubleday, 1999.Google Scholar
  73. Villa-Vicencio, Charles. “Why Perpetrators Should Not Always Be Prosecuted: Where the International Criminal Court and Truth Commissions Meet.” Emory Law Journal 49 (2000): 205–222.Google Scholar
  74. Weisman, Norman. “A History and Discussion of Amnesty.” Columbia Human Rights Law Review 4 (1972): 520–540.Google Scholar
  75. Williams, Paul. “The Role of Justice in Peace Negotiations.” In Post-Conflict Justice, edited by Cherif Bassiouni, 115–133. New York: Transnational Publishers, 2002.Google Scholar
  76. Wilson, Richard A. The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa: Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State. Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, Stuart. “The Myth of Restorative Justice: Truth, Reconciliation, and the Ethics of Amnesty.” South African Journal on Human Rights 17 (2001): 531–562.Google Scholar
  78. Young, Gwen. “Amnesty and accountability.” U.C. Davis Law Review 35 (2002): 427–482.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)MoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations