Skip to main content

Community Branching for Parallel Portfolio SAT Solvers

  • Conference paper
Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2014 (SAT 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8561))

Abstract

Portfolio approach for parallel SAT solvers is known as the standard parallelisation technique. In portfolio, diversification is one of the important factors in order to enable workers (solvers) to conduct a vast search. The diversification is implemented by setting different parameters for each worker in the state-of-the-art parallel portfolio SAT solvers. However, it is difficult to combine the search parameters properly in order to avoid overlaps of search spaces between the workers For this issue, we propose a novel diversification technique, called community branching. In this method, we assign a different set (or sets) of variables (called a community) to each worker and force them to select these variables as decision variables in early decision levels. In this manner, we can avoid the overlaps of the search spaces between the workers more vigorously than the existing method. We create a graph, where a vertex corresponds to a variable and an edge stands for a relation between two variables in a same clause, and we apply a modularity-based community detection algorithm to it. The variables in a community have strong relationships, and a distributed search for different communities can benefit the whole search. Experimental results show that we could speedup an existing parallel SAT solver with our proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ansótegui, C., Giráldez-Cru, J., Levy, J.: The Community Structure of SAT Formulas. In: Cimatti, A., Sebastiani, R. (eds.) SAT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7317, pp. 410–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Balint, A., Belov, A., Heule, M.J.H., Jrvisalo, M.: Proceedings of SAT Competition 2013; Solver and Benchmark Descriptions (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008(10), 10008 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Clauset, A., Newman, M.E.J., Moore, C.: Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E 70(6), 066111 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davis, M., Logemann, G., Loveland, D.: A machine program for theorem-proving. Communications of the ACM 5(7), 394–397 (1962)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Eriksen, K.A., Simonsen, I., Maslov, S., Sneppen, K.: Modularity and Extreme Edges of the Internet. Physical Review 90, 148701 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gil, L., Flores, P.F., Silveira, L.M.: PMSat: A parallel version of MiniSAT. JSAT 6(1-3), 71–98 (2009)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community Structure in Social and Biological Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99(12), 7821–7826 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: Algorithm Portfolio Design: Theory vs. Practice. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI 1997, pp. 190–197 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guo, L., Hamadi, Y., Jabbour, S., Sais, L.: Diversification and Intensification in Parallel SAT Solving. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, CP 2010, pp. 252–265 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamadi, Y., Jabbour, S., Sais, L.: ManySAT: A Parallel SAT Solver. JSAT 6(4), 245–262 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, M., Schubert, T., Becker, B.: Multithreaded SAT Solving. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference, ASP-DAC 2007, pp. 926–931 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martins, R., Manquinho, V., Lynce, I.: Community-Based Partitioning for MaxSAT Solving. In: Järvisalo, M., Van Gelder, A. (eds.) SAT 2013. LNCS, vol. 7962, pp. 182–191. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Moskewicz, M.W., Madigan, C.F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In: Proceedings of the 38th Annual Design Automation Conference, DAC 2001, pp. 530–535 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Raghavan, U.N., Albert, R., Kumara, S.: Near linear time algorithm to detect community structures in large-scale networks. Physical Review E 76(3), 036106 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosvall, M., Bergstrom, C.T.: Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(4), 1118–1123 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, H., Bonacina, M.P., Hsiang, J.: PSATO: A Distributed Propositional Prover and its Application to Quasigroup Problems. J. Symb. Comput. 21, 543–560 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sonobe, T., Kondoh, S., Inaba, M. (2014). Community Branching for Parallel Portfolio SAT Solvers. In: Sinz, C., Egly, U. (eds) Theory and Applications of Satisfiability Testing – SAT 2014. SAT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8561. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09284-3_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09283-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09284-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics