Rebound Effects and ICT: A Review of the Literature

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 310)

Abstract

This paper presents a critical review of the literature on the rebound effects generated by information and communication technologies (ICT). Following a discussion of the types of general rebound, including direct, indirect, and economy-wide, the literature on ICT-related rebound effects is critically assessed. The chapter suggests ways of overcoming rebound and lays out promising avenues of research to better understand and tackle rebound effects in ICT.

Keywords

Rebound effects ICT Resource efficiency 

References

  1. 1.
    ADEME: Chiffres clés (Climat, Air et Energie)—Edition 2013 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herring, H.: Does energy efficiency save energy? Power Econ. 4(4), 27 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herring, H.: Energy efficiency: a critical view. Energy 31(1), 10–20 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alcott, B.: Jevons’ paradox. Ecol. Econ. 54(1), 9–21 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polimeni, J.M.: Empirical evidence for the Jevons paradox. In: Polimeni, J.M., Mayumi, K., Giampietro, M., Alcott, B. (eds.) The Jevons Paradox and the Myth of Resource Efficiency Improvements, pp. 141–171. Earthscan, UK (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Missemer, A.: William Stanley Jevons’ the coal question (1865), beyond the rebound effect. Ecol. Econ. 82, 97–103 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Khazzoom, J.D.: Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Anglais 1(4), 21–40 (1980)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sorrell, S.: Jevons’ paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energ. Policy 37(4), 1456–1469 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hilty, L.M.: Information Technology and Sustainability: Essays on the Relationships Between Information Technology and Sustainable Development. Books on Demand, Norderstedt (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Berkhout, F., Hertin, J.: Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Environmental Sustainability: Speculations and Evidence, vol. 21. OECD report, University of Sussex, Brighton (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kennedy, S., Hill, S.: Could stereotype rebound affect aid advertising campaigns? Int. J. Nonprofit Public Sect. Mark. 14(2), 111–123 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Global View, Bio Intelligence Service, Ecologic: Addressing the rebound effect. Interim Report to the European Commission (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Berkhout, P.H.G., Muskens, J.C., Velthuijsen, W.J.: Defining the rebound effect. Energ. Policy 28(6–7), 425–432 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Greening, A.L., Greene, D.L., Difiglio, C.: Energy efficiency and consumption, the rebound effect: a survey. Energ. Policy 28(6–7), 389–401 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J.: The rebound effect: microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecol. Econ. 65(3), 636–649 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bentzen, J.: Estimating the rebound effect in US manufacturing energy consumption. Energ. Econ. 26(1), 123–134 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schipper, L., Grubb, M.: On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energ. Policy 28(6–7), 367–388 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersen, O.: Rebound effects. In: Andersen, O. (ed.) Unintended Consequences of Renewable Energy. Green Energy and Technology, pp. 19–33. Springer, London (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Youtie, J., Iacopetta, M., Graham, S.: Assessing the nature of nanotechnology: can we uncover an emerging general purpose technology? J. Technol. Transf. 33(3), 315–329 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Røpke, I.: The unsustainable directionality of innovation—the example of the broadband transition. Res. Policy 41(9), 1631–1642 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jovanovic, B., Rousseau, P.L.: General purpose technologies. In: Philippe, A., Steven, N.D. (eds.) Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1, Part B, Chapter 18, pp. 1181–1224. Elsevier, London (2005)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    BIO Intelligence Service: Impacts of ICT on energy efficiency. Report to DG INFSO (2008)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    European Commission: energy efficiency plan. http://ec.europa.eu/energy/efficiency/action_plan/action_plan_en.htm (2011). Accessed 14 July 2014
  24. 24.
    GeSI: Smart 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Antunes, C.H.: Energy efficiency for a more sustainable world. Energ. Policy 67, 1–3 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cho, Y., Lee, J., Kim, T.-Y.: The impact of ICT investment and energy price on industrial electricity demand: dynamic growth model approach. Energ. Policy 35(9), 4730–4738 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Binswanger, M.: Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol. Econ. 36(1), 119–132 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sorrell, S.: The evidence for direct rebound effects. In: Sorrell, S., Herring, H. (eds.) Energy Efficiency and Sustainable Consumption: The Rebound Effect, pp. 23–46. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Coroama, V.C., Moberg, A., Hilty, L.M.: Dematerialization through electronic media? In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 310, pp. 405–421. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Aebischer, B., Hilty, L.M.: The energy demand of ICT: a historical perspective and current methodological challenges. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 310, pp. 71–103. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaeslin, H.: Semiconductor technology and the energy efficiency of ICT. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 310, pp. 105–111. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Williams, E.D.: Environmental impacts of microchip manufacture. Thin Solid Films 461(1), 2–6 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Köhler, A., Erdmann, L.: Expected environmental impacts of pervasive computing. Human and ecological risk assessment. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 10(5), 831–852 (2004)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mercep, L., Buitkamp, C., Stähle, H., Spiegelberg, G., Knoll, A., Lienkamp, M.: The Innotruck case study on a holistic approach to electric mobility. In: Wellnitz, J., Subic, A., Trufin, R. (eds.) Sustainable Automotive Technologies 2013. Lecture Notes in Mobility, pp. 277–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Demarthon, F., Delbecq, D., Fléchet, G.: The big data revolution. CNRS Int. Mag. 28, 20–27 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hilbert, M., López, P.: The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science 332(6025), 60–65 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kogge, P.: The tops in flops. Spectrum IEEE 48(2), 48–54 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wolfe, M.: Beyond green buildings: Exploring the effects of Jevons’ paradox on the sustainability of archival practices. Arch. Sci. 12(1), 35–50 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Herring, H., Roy, R.: Sustainable services, electronic education and the rebound effect. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 22(5), 525–542 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Caird, S., Lane, A., Swithenby, E.: ICTs and the design of sustainable higher education teaching models: an environmental assessment of UK courses. In: Caeiro, S., Filho, W.L., Jabbour, C., Azeiteiro, U.M. (eds.) Sustainability Assessment Tools in Higher Education Institutions, pp. 375–385. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hoogeveen, M.J., Reijnders, L.: E-commerce, paper and energy use: a case study concerning a Dutch electronic computer retailer. Int. J. Global Energy Issues 18(2/3/4), 294–301 (2002)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Yi, L., Thomas, H.R.: A review of research on the environmental impact of e-business and ICT. Environ. Int. 33(6), 841–849 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fichter, K.: E-commerce: sorting out the environmental consequences. J. Ind. Ecol. 6(2), 25–41 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Fuchs, C.: The implications of new information and communication technologies for sustainability. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 10(3), 291–309 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hilty, L.M., Arnfalk, P., Erdmann, L., Goodman, J., Lehmann, M., Wäger, P.A.: The relevance of information and communication technologies for environmental sustainability—a prospective simulation study. Environ. Model Softw. 21(11), 1618–1629 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gardiner, B.: How smart ICT will find you a parking space. business reporter. http://business-reporter.co.uk/2013/01/how-smart-ict-will-find-you-a-parking-space (2013)
  47. 47.
    Green, J.: Smart parking coming to France. Smart mobility management. http://www.smart-mobilitymanagement.com/smart_parking_coming_to_france_54781-en-425-185015.html (2013)
  48. 48.
    Falch, M.: Environmental Impact of ICT on the Transport Sector. In: Hadjiantonis, A., Stiller, B. (eds.) Telecommunication Economics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7216, pp. 126–137. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Barla, P., Bolduc, D., Boucher, N., Watters, J.: Information technology and efficiency in trucking. Can. J. Econ. 43(1), 254–279 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Jinha, A.E.: Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learn. Publish. 23(3), 258–263 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Solomon, D.J.: The role of peer review for scholarly journals in the information age. J. Electr. Publ. 10(1), 25 (2007)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Gossart, C., Özman, M.: Co-authorship networks in social sciences: the case of Turkey. Scientometrics 78(2), 323–345 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rosa, H.: Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity. Columbia University Press, New York (2013)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Hilty, L.M., Köhler, A., Schéele, F., Zah, R., Ruddy, T.: Rebound effects of progress in information technology. Poiesis Prax. 4(1), 19–38 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Hörning, K.H., Ahrens, D., Gerhard, A.: Do technologies have time?: new practices of time and the transformation of communication technologies. Time Soc. 8(2–3), 293–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Lazonick, W.: From innovation to financialization: how shareholder value is destroying the U.S. Economy. In: Wolfson, M.H., Epstein, G.A. (eds.) The Handbook of the Political Economy of Financial Crises, pp. 491–511. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Gongloff, M.: The financial crisis cost more than $14 trillion: Dallas Fed Study. The Huffington post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/30/financial-crisis-cost-fed-study_n_3676118.html (2013)
  58. 58.
    Steinberger, J.K., van Niel, J., Bourg, D.: Profiting from negawatts: reducing absolute consumption and emissions through a performance-based energy economy. Energ. Policy 37(1), 361–370 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Murray, C.K.: What if consumers decided to all ‘go green’? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions. Energ. Policy 54, 240–256 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Throne-Holst, H., Stø, E., Strandbakken, P.: The role of consumption and consumers in zero emission strategies. J. Clean. Prod. 15(13/14), 1328–1336 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Passey, R., MacGill, I.: Energy sales targets: an alternative to White Certificate schemes. Energ. Policy 37(6), 2310–2317 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Shay, S.: Bigfoot. Technol. Rev. 111(4), M7–M7 (2008)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    van den Bergh, J.C.J.M.: Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48(1), 43–58 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Vine, E., Hall, N., Keating, K., Kushler, M., Prahl, R.: Emerging evaluation issues: persistence, behavior, rebound, and policy. Energ. Effi. 6(2), 329–339 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Madjar, M., Ozawa, T.: Happiness and sustainable consumption: psychological and physical rebound effects at work in a tool for sustainable design. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 11(1), 105–115 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nowak, P.: Beware the rebound effect. Corp. Knights Mag. 11(1), 65 (2012)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ricciardi, S., Careglio, D., Santos-Boada, G., Solé-Pareta, J., Fiore, U., Palmieri, F.: Towards an energy-aware Internet: modeling a cross-layer optimization approach. Telecommun. Syst. 52(2), 1247–1268 (2013)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Shapiro, S.S.: Privacy by design: moving from art to practice. Commun. ACM 53(6), 27–29 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Irrek, W.: How to reduce the rebound effect? In: Bleischwitz, R., Welfens, P.J.J., Zhang, Z. (eds.) International Economics of Resource Efficiency, pp. 279–285. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Télécom École de ManagementInstitut Mines-TélécomEvry CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations