Advertisement

The Transition from Desktop Computers to Tablets: A Model for Increasing Resource Efficiency?

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 310)

Abstract

Sales statistics of computing devices show that users are not replacing units one by one, but rather adding additional devices to their hardware portfolios. This chapter describes the outcomes of a first attempt to quantify the ecological implications of changes in the use of ICT hardware for computing services by using LCA and applying three different perspectives ranging from individual devices to global sales of desktop, laptop, and tablet computers. In particular, it addresses the question of which effect actually predominates: the increase in efficiency induced by the emergence of new technologies or the growing energy consumption due to an increased number of devices combined with a higher utilization rate by individual users. The comparison shows a clear reduction of the environmental impact per hour of active use; and the smaller the device, the smaller the impact due to the active use of the device. However, when the evolution in the use of these kinds of devices is taken into account as well, the picture changes. The calculations show that the higher in-use efficiency of individual devices is fully compensated by the efforts for the production of the increasing number of devices in use, without even considering increased use time. If increased use intensity is assumed as well, a clear increase of the overall impact per day can be observed.

Keywords

Life cycle assessment LCA Resource efficiency Desktop computer Tablet 

References

  1. 1.
    Dugan, A.: American’s Tech Tastes Change with Time. Internet-connected devices growing in popularity. http://www.gallup.com/poll/166745/americans-tech-tastes-change-times.aspx (2014). Accessed 15 July 2014
  2. 2.
    Ecoinvent Centre: Ecoinvent data v1.1. In: Volume of Final reports ecoinvent 2000 No. 1–15. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ecoinvent Centre: Ecoinvent data v2.01. In: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gossart, C.: Rebound effects and ICT: a review of the literature. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 310, pp. 435–448. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmadi Achachlouei, M., Moberg, A., Hochschorner, E.: Life cycle assessment of a magazine—part 1: tablet edition in emerging and mature states. J. Ind. Ecol. Accept. (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hischier, R., Classen, M., Lehmann, M., Scharnhorst, W.: Life cycle inventories of electric and electronic equipment: production, use and disposal. In: Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Empa—TSL, Dübendorf (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hischier, R., Keller, M., Lisibach, R., Hilty, L.M.: Mat—an ICT application to support a more sustainable use of print products and ICT devices. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B., Andersson, G., Lohmann, W. (eds.) ICT4S 2013: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Sustainability, ETH Zürich 2013, pp. 223–230Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ecoinvent Centre: Ecoinvent data v3.01—Online Database. Available at www.ecoinvent.org. In. ecoinvent Association, Zürich (2013)
  9. 9.
    Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M.A.J., de Schreyver, A., Struijs, J., Van Zelm, R.: ReCiPe 2008—nt and the endpoint level. First edition (revised)/Report I: Characterisation. In: VROM—Ministery of Housing Spatial Planning and Environment, Den Haag (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    ISO: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. In: International Standardisation Organisation (ISO), European Standard EN ISO 14’044, Geneva (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ISO: Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. In: International Standardization Organization (ISO), European Standard EN ISO 14’040, Geneva (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hischier, R., Coroama, V.C., Schien, D., Ahmadi Achachlouei, M.: Grey energy and environmental impacts of ICT hardware. In: Hilty, L.M., Aebischer, B. (eds.) ICT Innovations for Sustainability. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 310, pp. 171–189. Springer, Switzerland (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    eTForecasts: Worldwide PC Market. http://www.etforecasts.com/products/ES_pcww1203.htm. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  14. 14.
    Gartner: Gartner Says Worldwide Traditional PC, Tablet, Ultramobile and Mobile Phone Shipments On Pace to Grow 7.6 Percent in 2014. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2645115?fnl=search. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  15. 15.
    IDC: IDC: Tablet Sales Grew 78.4 % YoY In 2012—Expected to Pass Desktop Sales In 2013, Portable PCs In 2014. http://techcrunch.com/2013/03/27/idc-tablet-growth-2012-2017/ (2013). Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  16. 16.
    statista.com: Forecast for global shipments of tablets, laptops and desktop PCs from 2010 to 2017 (in milion units). http://www.statista.com/statistics/272595/global-shipments-forecast. Accessed 20 Feb 2014
  17. 17.
    A.T. Kearney Inc.: The Internet Economy in the United Kingdom. In. A.T. Kearney Inc., London (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EmpaSwiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and TechnologySt. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations