Skip to main content

The EyeDIFF Intraocular Lens

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Part of the book series: Essentials in Ophthalmology ((ESSENTIALS))

  • 1269 Accesses

Abstract

The goal of a multifocal IOL is to provide functional vision at different distances to minimise the use of glasses. Most studies support that these IOLs offer good distance and near visual acuity (Cochener et al., Clin Ophthalmol 5:45–56, 2011). However, it is well known that traditional diffractive bifocal multifocal IOLs report poor scores for intermediate vision, which correlates with worse intermediate visual acuity and a high percentage of patients who wear glasses for seeing objects at intermediate distance (Alfonso et al., J Cataract Refract Surg 36:733–39, 2010). The poor performance at intermediate vision is due to their optical design where light is distributed in two major peaks, zero order for far and first order for near vision. Recent advances in diffractive multifocal IOLs technology offer a new alternative for those desiring vision at distance, intermediate and near (Anton et al., Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 252:539–44, 2014). This chapter describes a new IOL based on 100 % diffractive technology, providing an extended range of clear vision at all distances. The full-range multifocal lens makes use of both refractive and diffractive optics. Consequently, the design of the lens is governed by refractive and diffractive considerations and their interrelations. The diffractive power of the zones gradually decreases across each zone in the radial direction r (throughout this specification, underlined italic symbols represent vector) as illustrated in Fig. 15.1 above. Diffractive power of the zone is the first-order diffractive power. The advantage of gradually decreasing diffractive power is that it provides intermediate vision along near and far vision. It is achieved by decreasing diffractive power across each zone and changing the diffraction pattern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cochener B, Lafuma A, Khoshnood B, Courouve L, Berdeaux G. Comparison of outcomes with multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:45–56. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S14325.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L, Puchades C, Montes-Mico R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:733–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anton A, Böhringer D, Bach M, Reinhard T, Birnbaum F. Contrast sensitivity with bifocal intraocular lenses is halved, as measured with the Freiburg Vision Test (FrACT), yet patients are happy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:539–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pieh S, Lackner B, Hanselmayer G, Zöhrer R, Sticker M, Weghaupt H, Fercher A, Skorpik C. Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001;85(7):816–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubiński W, Podboraczyńska-Jodko K, Gronkowska-Serafin J, Karczewicz D. Visual outcomes three and six months after implantation of diffractive and refractive multifocal IOL combinations. Klin Oczna. 2011;113(7–9):209–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Piñero DP, Amparo F, Jiménez R, Rodríguez-Prats JL, Javaloy J, Pongo V. Optical analysis, reading performance, and quality-of-life evaluation after implantation of a diffractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(1):27–37. doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gatinel D, Houbrechts Y. Comparison of bifocal and trifocal diffractive and refractive intraocular lenses using an optical bench. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:1093–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Compliance with Ethical Requirements

Conflict of Interest

Roger Zaldivar and Roberto Zaldivar hereby declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Animal Studies

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Zaldivar MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zaldivar, R., Zaldivar, R. (2014). The EyeDIFF Intraocular Lens. In: Alió, J., Pikkel, J. (eds) Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. Essentials in Ophthalmology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09219-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09218-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09219-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics